dcsimg

Description ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من AmphibiaWeb articles
This frog is a member of the mountain yellow-legged frog complex, which is comprised of two species: Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae. Both species are highly aquatic and are always found within a meter or two from the edge of water. Like Rana sierrae, Rana muscosa is yellowish or reddish brown from above, with black or brown spots or lichen-like markings. Toe tips are usually dusky. Underside of hind legs and sometimes entire belly is yellow or slightly orange, usually more opaque than in the Foothill Yellow-legged Frog, Rana boylii. Yellow coloration often extends forward to level of forelimbs. Dorsolateral folds present but frequently indistinct. The tadpoles are black or dark brown and are large (total length often exceeds 10 cm) and metamorphose in 1-4 years depending on the elevation. Rana muscosa differs from Rana sierrae in having relatively longer legs. When a leg is folded against the body the tibio-tarsal joint typically extends beyond the external nares. The mating call of R. muscosa is significantly different from that of R. sierrae in that they lack transitions between pulsed and noted sounds. Both species call underwater. Males can be heard above water but only from a short distance away (

مراجع

  • Bradford, D. F. (1989). "Allotopic distribution of native frogs and introduced fishes in high Sierra Nevada lakes of California: implication of the negative effect of fish introductions." Copeia, 1989, 775-778.
  • Bradford, D. F. (1989). ''Allotopic distribution of native frogs and introduced fishes in high Sierra Nevada lakes of California USA: Implication of the negative effect of fish introductions.'' Copeia, 1989(3), 775-778.
  • Bradford, D. F., Tabatabai, F., and Graber, D. M. (1993). ''Isolation of remaining populations of the native frog, Rana muscosa, by introduced fishes in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, California.'' Conservation Biology, 7, 882-888.
  • Briggs, C. J., Knapp, R. A., and Vredenburg, V. T. (2010). ''Enzootic and epizootic dynamics of the chytrid fungal pathogen of amphibians.'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(21), 9695-9700 .
  • Davidson, C. (2004). ''Declining downwind: Amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use.'' Ecological Applications, 14, 1892-1902.
  • Davidson, C., Shaffer, H. B., and Jennings, M. R. (2002). ''Spatial tests of the pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines.'' Conservation Biology, 16, 1588-1601.
  • Finlay, J. and Vredenburg, V. T. (2007). ''Introduced trout sever trophic connections between lakes and watersheds: consequences for a declining montane frog.'' Ecology, 88(9), 2187-2198.
  • Grinnell, J., and Storer, T. I. (1924). Animal Life in the Yosemite. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
  • Knapp, R. A. and Matthews, F. (2000). ''Non-native fish introductions and the decline of the Mountain Yellow-legged Frog from within protected areas.'' Conservation Biology, 14(2), 428-439.
  • Knapp, R. A., Boiano, D. M., Vredenburg, V. T. (2007). ''Recovery of a declining amphibian (Mountain Yellow-legged Frog, Rana muscosa) following removal of non-native fish.'' Biological Conservation, 135, 11-20.
  • Knapp, R.A. (1996). ''Non-native trout in the natural lakes of the Sierra Nevada: an analysis of their distribution and impacts on native aquatic biota.'' Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, Center for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California (Davis), Davis, California, 363-390.
  • Lewis, T. R. (2009). ''New population of mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) discovered.'' Herpetological Bulletin, 108, 1-2.
  • Livezey, R. L., and Wright, A. H. (1945). ''Descriptions of four salientian eggs.'' American Midland Naturalist, 34, 701-706.
  • Rachowicz, L. J., Knapp, R. A., Morgan, J. A. T., Stice, M. J., Vredenburg, V. T., Parker, J. M., and Briggs, C. J. (2006). ''Emerging infectious disease as a proximate cause of amphibian mass mortality.'' Ecology, 87, 1671-1683.
  • Salzberg, A. (2009). ''Population of nearly extinct Mountain Yellow-legged Frog discovered.'' Herpetological Digest, 9, 4.
  • Voyles, J., Vredenburg, V. T., Tunstall, T. S., Parker, J. M., Briggs, C. J., and Rosenblum, E. B. (2012). ''Pathophysiology in mountain yellow-legged frogs (Rana muscosa) during a chytridiomycosis outbreak .'' PLoS ONE, 7(4), e35374. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035374.
  • Vredenburg, V. T. (2004). ''Reversing introduced species effects: Experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog.'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 7646-7650.
  • Vredenburg, V. T., (2007). ''Concordant molecular and phenotypic data delineate new taxonomy and conservation priorities for the endangered mountain yellow-legged frog (Ranidae: Rana muscosa).'' Journal of Zoology, 271, 361-374.
  • Vredenburg, V. T., Fellers, G., and Davidson, C. (2005). ''The mountain yellow-legged frog Rana muscosa (Camp 1917).'' Status and conservation of U.S. Amphibians. M. Lannoo, eds., University of California Press, Berkeley, 563-566.
  • Vredenburg, V. T., Knapp, R. A., Tunstall, T. S., and Briggs, C. J. (2010). ''Dynamics of an emerging disease drive large-scale amphibian population extinctions.'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(21), 9689-9694.
  • Zweifel, R. G. (1955). ''Ecology, distribution, and systematics of frogs of the Rana boylei group.'' University of California Publications in Zoology, 54, 207-292.

ترخيص
cc-by-3.0
مؤلف
Vance T. Vredenburg
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
AmphibiaWeb articles

Distribution and Habitat ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من AmphibiaWeb articles
Rana muscosa is endemic to California, U.S.A. The Southern Mountain Yellow-legged Frog once ranged from Palomar Mountain in San Diego County through the San Jacinto, San Bernardino and San Gabriel Mountains of Riverside, San Bernardino and Los Angeles counties in southern California. These formed four isolated clusters of montane populations. In addition the species occurred as an isolated cluster of populations on Breckenridge Mountain, south of the Kern River in Kern County, and in the Sierra Nevada mountains in Tulare, Inyo, and Fresno counties, extending north to Mather Pass. The distribution of Rana muscosa in the Sierra Nevada is bordered by the crest of Sierra Nevada. No populations occur east of the crest. The mountain ridges that separate the headwaters of the South Fork Kings River from the Middle Fork Kings River, from Mather Pass on the John Muir Trail to the Monarch Divide, form the northern border of the range. R. muscosa is extinct on Palomar and Breckenridge mountains.In summer 2009 a population of Rana muscosa was discovered in the San Jacinto Mountains by a team of USGS and San Diego Natural History Museum biologists (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). The frogs were found at two localities in Tahquitz Creek and one of its tributaries, Willow Creek, about 2.5 miles apart (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). The newly discovered San Jacinto population appears to be occupying a larger area than the other known populations, although the extent and population number are not yet known (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). A total of eight other populations are known from the San Jacinto, San Bernardino, and San Gabriel mountain ranges, each occupying less than half a mile of stream (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009).
ترخيص
cc-by-3.0
مؤلف
Vance T. Vredenburg
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
AmphibiaWeb articles

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من AmphibiaWeb articles
Rana muscosa have declined dramatically despite the fact that most of the habitat is protected in National Parks and National Forest lands. A study that compared recent surveys (1995-2005) to historical localities (1899-1994; specimens from the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and the California Academy of Sciences) found that 96.2% of populations had gone extinct, with only 3 remaining out of 79 resurveyed sites (Vredenburg et al. 2007). The two most important factors leading to declines in R. sierrae and R. muscosa are introduced predators and disease. Introduced trout prey on R. sierrae (Needham and Vestal, 1938; Mullally and Cunningham, 1956) and have been implicated in a number of studies as one of the sources of decline in both R. sierrae and R. muscosa (Bradford 1989; Bradford et al. 1993; Jennings 1994; Knapp 1996; Drost and Fellers 1996; Knapp and Matthews 2000). Whole lake field experiments have shown that when non-native trout are removed, both Rana sierrae and Rana muscosa populations rebound (Vredenburg 2004; Knapp et al. 2007). While it is clear that introduced trout negatively affect R. sierrae and R. muscosa mainly through predation on tadpoles, trout also compete for resources with adult frogs. A food web study that used stable isotopes to trace energy through food webs in Sierran lakes concluded that introduced trout are superior competitors and suppress the availability of large aquatic insects that make up a major portion of the diets of adult frogs (Finlay and Vredenburg 2007). Trout removal by the California Department of Fish and Game has reduced fish populations in the Little Rock Creek in the Angeles National Forest, resulting in increased numbers of Rana muscosa (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). A lethal disease, chytridiomycosis (http://www.amphibiaweb.org/chytrid/chytridiomycosis.html), caused by an aquatic fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Berger et al. 1998) has caused population extinctions in R. muscosa and R. sierrae in the Sierra Nevada (Rachowicz et al. 2006). Long-term studies reveal that infection intensity is key; once a critical threshold of Bd fungal infection is reached, death ensues (Vredenburg et al. 2010). Population extirpation is the most common outcome, but a few mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana sierrae and Rana muscosa) populations have survived in low numbers. Modeling shows that chytriodiomycosis outcome at the population level (extirpation vs. persistence) can result solely from density-dependent host-pathogen dynamics, which may hold for other wildlife diseases as well (Briggs et al. 2010). A new study conducted during an outbreak of chytridiomycosis in the Sierra Nevada has shown that electrolyte depletion (sodium and potassium) for heavily infected wild mountain yellow-legged frogs is even more extensive than studies done in captivity have suggested, and is accompanied by severe dehydration despite the frogs' aquatic environment (Voyles et al. 2012). See also the NSF commentary (http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=123871&WT.mc_id=USNSF_51&WT.mc_ev=click). In an effort to rescue the last surviving mountain yellow-legged frogs, the Vredenburg lab is treating adult frogs in the field with anti-fungal medication; frogs are bathed for five minutes daily over the course of a week (Lubick 2010). Electrolyte supplementation may also be a way to help save individual frogs (Voyles et al. 2012). Other possible causes for decline in R. muscosa include air pollution from pesticide drift (Davidson et al. 2002; Davidson 2004), UV-B radiation, and long term changes in weather patterns, especially concerning the severity and duration of droughts. Acidification from atmospheric deposition has been suggested as another cause, but Bradford et al. (1994) found no evidence to support this hypothesis. The San Diego's Institute for Conservation Research has instituted a captive breeding program for this species (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). In 2006, tadpoles were rescued from a drying creek in the San Jacinto Wilderness and were reared in captivity (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). In December 2008 a pair of these frogs laid a clutch of 200 eggs in captivity; only a handful of these eggs were fertile, due to the young parental age, and a single offspring has survived to maturity (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009). The most recent breeding season, however (December 2009-March 2010) was very successful and biologists have just reintroduced about 500 eggs into the wild, as of April 23, 2010, into deep permanent pools at the University of California Riverside’s James San Jacinto Mountains Reserve (http://www.jamesreserve.edu/). Tadpoles that hatch from these eggs will take about two years to mature into adults. The adults are expected to stay within the reserve since they do not migrate. The tadpole rescue and frog breeding effort has been funded by Caltrans, as part of mitigation for emergency work necessary to stabilize a slope and reopen State Route 330 near Rana muscosa habitat in the San Bernardino Mountains (Salzberg 2009; Lewis 2009).
ترخيص
cc-by-3.0
مؤلف
Vance T. Vredenburg
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
AmphibiaWeb articles

Life History, Abundance, Activity, and Special Behaviors ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من AmphibiaWeb articles
Similar to R. sierrae, breeding begins soon after ice-melt or early in spring and can range from April at lower elevations to June and July in higher elevations (Wright and Wright 1949; Stebbins 1951; Zweifel 1955). Eggs are deposited underwater in clusters attached to rocks, gravel, and under banks, or to vegetation in streams or lakes (Wright and Wright 1949; Stebbins 1951; Zweifel 1955). Livezey and Wright (1945) report an average of 233 eggs per mass (n=6, range 100-350) for R. sierrae, but egg counts per egg mass appear similar for R. muscosa (Vredenburg, unpublished data). Eggs contain a vitelline capsule, and three gelatinous envelopes, all clear and transparent (see illustrations in Stebbins 2003). In laboratory breeding experiments egg hatching times ranged from 18-21+ days at temperatures ranging from 5-13.5 degrees C (Zweifel 1955). The length of the larval stage depends upon the elevation. At lower elevations where the summers are longer, tadpoles are able to grow to metamorphosis in a single season (Storer 1925). At higher elevations where the growing season can be as short as three months, tadpoles must overwinter at least once and may take two to four years of growth before they are large enough to transform (Wright and Wright 1949; Zweifel 1955).
ترخيص
cc-by-3.0
مؤلف
Vance T. Vredenburg
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
AmphibiaWeb articles

Relation to Humans ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من AmphibiaWeb articles
Mountain yellow-legged frogs (the amphibian species complex including Rana muscosa and Rana sierrae) were once the most common vertebrates in the high elevation Sierra Nevada. Documented historical accounts go back to the turn of the last century (1915) from surveys conducted by Joseph Grinnell and Tracy Storer (published in 1924) from the University of California's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Joseph Grinnell was instrumental in the foundation of Yosemite National Park, one of the crown jewels of the United States National Park Service.
ترخيص
cc-by-3.0
مؤلف
Vance T. Vredenburg
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
AmphibiaWeb articles

Mountain yellow-legged frog ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من wikipedia EN

The mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa), also known as the southern mountain yellow-legged frog, is a species of true frog endemic to California in the United States.[1][2] It occurs in the San Jacinto Mountains, San Bernardino Mountains, and San Gabriel Mountains in Southern California and the Southern Sierra Nevada. It is a federally listed endangered species,[3] separated into two distinct population segments (DPS): a northern DPS, listed endangered in 2014,[4] and a southern DPS that was listed endangered in 2002.[5]

Populations formerly classified as Rana muscosa in the northern Sierra Nevada have since been redescribed as a new species: Rana sierrae, the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog has also been classified as a federally endangered species since 2014.[4] The mountains separating the headwaters of the South Fork and Middle Fork of the Kings River mark the boundary between the ranges of the two species.[1]

Description

Mountain yellow-legged frog

Rana muscosa is 4 to 8.9 centimetres (1.6 to 3.5 in) long. Females tend to be larger than males.[6] Its color and patterning are variable. It is yellowish, brownish, or olive with black and brown markings. The underside of its hind legs can be different hues of yellow, from a bold sun yellow to a lighter pale yellow; larger ones may can hints of orange on their hind legs. The throats of it range from white to yellow.[7] Along with its variable coloration, the frog also has a dorsal pattern with dark spots in different shapes and sizes. Its species name muscosa is from the Latin meaning "mossy" or "full of moss", inspired by its coloration. It may have light orange or yellow thighs. When handled, the frog emits a defensive odor reminiscent of garlic.[8]

Habitat

The frog occurs in mountain creeks, lakes and lakeshores, streams, and pools, preferring sunny areas. It rarely strays far from water, and can remain underwater for a very long time, likely through cutaneous gas exchange. As such, adults can be found on rocks around shorelines. Close proximity to water is important because eggs are either laid underwater attached to rocks or in shallow waters. The tadpoles require a permanent water habitat for at least two years while they develop. This is because tadpoles can die from a lack of moisture, especially dry summers. The frog has been noted at elevations of between about 1,214 and 7,546 feet (370 and 2,300 m) in Southern California.[1] These habitats are primarily found in north of California in Sierra Nevada and south of California in the Transverse ranges.

Reproduction and early life

Tadpole stage

The frog emerges from its wintering site soon after snowmelt. Its breeding season begins once the highest meltwater flow is over, around March through May in the southern part of its range, and up to July in higher mountains to the north. Fertilization is external, and the egg cluster is secured to vegetation in a current, or in still waters sometimes left floating free. How long it takes for breeding onset varies from 1–4 years depending on the levels of snow and temperature. Very cold temperatures may cause death of larvae.[7] The juvenile may be a tadpole for 3 to 4 years before undergoing metamorphosis.[8] However, this rate heavily varies depending on the temperature and elevation of the area.[7] There are two classes of tadpoles: first year tadpoles and second year tadpoles. Metamorphosis tends to happen the second summer of tadpole life. They are called metamorphs when this transition from tadpole to young frog is occurring. They are then called a juvenile when it survives one winter. It becomes ready to reproduce after 2 years of the juvenile stage. It is found that the growth and development rate is slower at higher elevations.[7]

Behavior

The frog lacks a vocal sac. Its call is raspy, rising at the end. During the day, it calls underwater.[8] The frogs tend to be less active during the winters and more active during the mating season. For years when there is heavy snow at high elevations, they may only be active for 90 days in the summer.[7] Hibernation tends to happen underwater or in the crevices of stream banks. This occurs during the cold months of winter. Hibernation ends in the spring to start the breeding season.[3] This species feeds on aquatic insects and benthic invertebrates. Their diet varies depending on the habitat type. When living in streams, it tends to eat terrestrial insects such as beetles, ants, bees, wasps, flies, and dragonflies.[7] They are also known to eat larvae of other frogs and toads, as well as commit cannibalism.[8]

Decline

Mountain Yellow-Legged frog.jpg

Once a common species, Rana muscosa was absent from much of its native range by the 1970s. Over the course of the last hundred years, 90% of its populations have been eliminated.[9] The frog was known from 166 locations in the Southern California mountains, and as of 2007, only seven or eight remained.[1] The 2009 discovery of R. muscosa at two locations in the San Bernardino National Forest was newsworthy.[10] The frog is represented in the Sierra Nevada by three or four populations.[1] Its decline is attributed to many factors, including introduced species of fish such as trout, livestock grazing,[11] chytrid fungus,[12] and probably pesticides, drought, and ultraviolet radiation.[11] Recreational activities in streams have also had an impact.[13]

Introduced fish species

Trout were introduced to lakes and streams throughout the Sierra Nevada in the late 1800s to increase recreational fishing in the area. 90% of these Sierra Nevada lakes and streams did not previously have fish in them, although the trout were regionally present.[14] The fish feed on tadpoles, a main prey item. Some of the fish types that prey on tadpoles include the brown, golden, and rainbow trout, as well as the brook char.[15] The introduced trout have changed the distribution of several native species in the local ecosystems.[9] Most of the mountain yellow-legged frog populations did not evolve to adapt to the trout. The trout caused populations to isolate, restricted the amount of available habitats, and increased the chances of extinction. After the removal of fish from several lakes, the frog reappeared and its populations increased.[9] These frogs then began to disperse to other suitable habitats nearby.[16]

Pesticides

The decline of the frog from its historic range has been associated with pesticide drift from agricultural areas.[17][18] Frogs that have been reintroduced to water bodies cleared of fish have failed to survive, and analysis has isolated pesticides in their tissues.[19] Pesticides are considered by some authorities to be a greater threat to the frog than the trout.[20] The relative roles that pesticides and introduced fish play in frog declines are still debated, and the loss of R. muscosa in its former range has probably been influenced by multiple factors.[19]

Chytridiomycosis

Rana muscosa

This species is one of many amphibians affected by the fungal disease chytridiomycosis. Ample research has explored the biology of the fungus and how to prevent related amphibian declines.[12] The fungus attacks keratinized areas of a frog's body. Tadpoles are not severely affected because only their jaw sheaths and tooth rows are heavily keratinized.[21] Infection in a tadpole can be identified by changes in the pigmentation of these parts.[22] Adults have keratin-rich skin and suffer worse infections.

In studies, healthy adult frogs exposed to infected frogs for at least two weeks developed the disease. Transmission takes longer in tadpoles, generally over seven weeks.[22] Frogs may be predisposed to infection if their immune systems are weakened by other factors, such as pesticide.[23] Studies indicate that R. muscosa is naturally more susceptible to the chytrid fungus than many other frogs.[24]

Conservation status and efforts

The frog is an endangered species under the US Endangered Species Act.[3] It is separated into two distinct population segments (DPS): a northern DPS, listed endangered since 2014,[4] and a southern DPS that was listed endangered in 2002.[5] The two DPS are separated by the Tehachapi Mountains, and occupy unique habitats: the northern DPS lives in lakes or slow-moving water bodies at alpine and subalpine elevations in the Sierra Nevada, while the southern DPS lives in faster flowing and warmer waters of the chaparral, although it may also occur at higher elevations in the Transverse Range.[4]: 24263–2464  In addition, the DPS show genetic divergence, likely reflecting ancient reproductive isolation.[4]: 24263–2464 

The International Union for Conservation of Nature has also listed the mountain yellow-legged frog as endangered.[1] Its NatureServe conservation status is "critically imperiled."[25]

The first successful captive breeding of the frog occurred in 2009 when three tadpoles were reared at the San Diego Zoo. Conservation workers at the zoo plan to release any more surviving captive-bred frogs in the San Jacinto Mountains, part of their native range.[15][26]

In 2015 frogs and tadpoles of the species were reintroduced to Fuller Mill Creek in the San Bernardino Mountains and San Bernardino National Forest.[27] They were bred and raised the Arnold and Mabel Beckman Center for Conservation Research in Escondido, one of the organizations that have partnered with the San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research (ICR) to save the species from extinction.[27] The Los Angeles Zoo is also a coalition partner and is raising two groups of wild collected tadpoles from two localities in the San Gabriel Mountains where they are released when ready.[27][28]

In 2015, the Oakland Zoo began a rehabilitation project of the frog in order to fuel efforts to save the species.[29] Every year, a group of tadpoles are taken from native lakes throughout California and brought to the zoo. There, the tadpoles are grown to juvenile frogs, while also undergoing an inoculation process to render them immune to the chytridiomycosis fungus disease. Once ready, the now chytrid immune juvenile frogs are released back into the lakes they were found. In 2016, the Oakland Zoo released 53 specimens into various lakes in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks.[30] The program is set to release 130 inoculated individuals into lakes in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks and Inyo National Forest in 2017.

In 2021, the Aquarium of the Pacific partnered with government organizations like the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to create a facility for taking care of mountain yellow-legged frogs. This was in response to recent wildfires which harmed their habitats. Following the wildfires, wildlife agencies found and moved these frogs into places like the facility established by the Aquarium of the Pacific. These efforts help the species recover from natural disasters and prevent extinction.[31][32]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group (2022). "Rana muscosa". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2022: e.T19177A118975294. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  2. ^ a b Frost, Darrel R. (2021). "Rana muscosa Camp, 1917". Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.1. American Museum of Natural History. doi:10.5531/db.vz.0001. Retrieved February 16, 2021.
  3. ^ a b c "Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa)". Environmental Conservation Online System. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  4. ^ a b c d e 79 FR 24256
  5. ^ a b 67 FR 44382
  6. ^ "Mountain Yellow-legged Frog (Rana muscosa) | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service". FWS.gov. Retrieved October 21, 2022.
  7. ^ a b c d e f United States Department of Agriculture (2014). “MOUNTAIN YELLOW-LEGGED FROG CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT for the SIERRA NEVADA MOUNTAINS OF CALIFORNIA, USA.
  8. ^ a b c d Rana muscosa - Southern Mountain Yellow-legged Frog, California Herps: A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. 2013.
  9. ^ a b c Knapp, R. A., et al. (2007). "Removal of nonnative fish results in population expansion of a declining amphibian (mountain yellow-legged frog, Rana muscosa)' Biological Conservation 135(1):11-20.
  10. ^ Discovery Channel (July 24, 2009). Nearly extinct California frog rediscovered. NBC News. Retrieved 28 April 2023.
  11. ^ a b Vredenburg, V. The Mountain Yellow-legged Frog - Can They be Saved? Archived 2019-04-20 at the Wayback Machine Sierra Nature Notes Volume 1. January, 2001.
  12. ^ a b The Amphibian Chytrid Fungus and Chytridiomycosis. Archived 2009-02-21 at the Wayback Machine Amphibianark.org. Retrieved 04 August 2013.
  13. ^ Bailey, Tia (September 21, 2022). "Yellow-Legged Frogs To Be Reintroduced to San Gabriel Mountains". Outsider. Retrieved September 22, 2022.
  14. ^ "Sierra Nevada Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog - Sierra Forest Legacy". www.sierraforestlegacy.org. Retrieved October 21, 2022.
  15. ^ a b Mountain Yellow-legged Frog Hopping for Survival. Archived 2013-05-13 at the Wayback Machine San Diego Zoo Global.
  16. ^ Vredenburg, V. T. (2004). "Reversing introduced species effects: Experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (20): 7646–7650. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402321101. PMC 419660. PMID 15136741.
  17. ^ Davidson, Carlos; Shaffer, H. Bradley & Jennings, Mark R. (2002). "Spatial tests of the pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines". Conservation Biology. 16 (6): 1588–1601. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01030.x.
  18. ^ Davidson, Carlos (2004). "Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use". Ecological Applications. 14 (6): 1892–1902. doi:10.1890/03-5224.
  19. ^ a b Davidson, Carlos & Knapp, Roland A. (2007). "Multiple stressors and amphibian declines: dual impacts of pesticides and fish on yellow-legged frogs". Ecological Applications. 17 (2): 587–597. doi:10.1890/06-0181. PMID 17489262.
  20. ^ Taylor, Sharon K.; Williams, Elizabeth S. & Mills, Ken W. (1999). "Effects of malathion on disease susceptibility in Woodhouse's toads". Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 35 (3): 536–541. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-35.3.536. PMID 10479088.
  21. ^ Andre, Sara E.; Parker, John & Briggs, Cheryl J. (July 2008). "Effect of temperature on host response to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection in the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa)". Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 44 (3): 716–720. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-44.3.716. PMID 18689660. Archived 2013-08-05 at archive.today
  22. ^ a b Rachowicz, Lara J. & Vredenburg, Vance T. (2004). "Transmission of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis within and between amphibian life stages" (PDF). Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 61 (1–2): 75–83. doi:10.3354/dao061075. PMID 15584413.
  23. ^ Rachowicz, Lara J.; Knapp, Roland A.; Morgan, Jess A. T.; Stice, Mary J.; Vredenburg, Vance T.; Parker, John M. & Briggs, Cheryl J. (July 2006). "Emerging infectious disease as a proximate cause of amphibian mass mortality" (PDF). Ecology. 87 (7): 1671–1683. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1671:EIDAAP]2.0.CO;2. PMID 16922318.
  24. ^ Rollins-Smith, Louise A.; Woodhams, Douglas C.; Reinert, Laura K.; Vredenburg, Vance T.; Briggs, Cheryl J.; Nielsen, Per F. & Michael Conlon, J. (January 2006). "Antimicrobial peptide defenses of the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa)" (PDF). Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 30 (9): 831–842. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2005.10.005. PMID 16330099.
  25. ^ NatureServe (April 7, 2023). "Rana muscosa". NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data accessed through NatureServe Explorer. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  26. ^ "Precious Cargo: Brighter Future For 100 Juvenile Mountain Yellow Legged Frogs, Tadpoles". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. November 7, 2016. Retrieved January 1, 2017.
  27. ^ a b c SoCal Wild.com: "Building a Mountain Frogtown for Yellow-Legged Frogs"; Brenda Rees, editor; 10 August 2015.
  28. ^ Sahagun, Louis (August 15, 2019). "Meet the 'rock star' frog breeder vying to save Southern California's rarest amphibian". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
  29. ^ "Oakland Zoo". www.oaklandzoo.org. Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  30. ^ "From the Brink of Extinction: Oakland Zoo Releases Critically Endangered Frogs into the Wild : The Outdoor Wire". www.theoutdoorwire.com. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  31. ^ Aquarium of the Pacific. "Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog". www.aquariumofpacific.org. Retrieved October 19, 2022.
  32. ^ "Mountain Yellow-legged Frog (Rana muscosa) | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service". FWS.gov. Retrieved October 19, 2022.
ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Wikipedia authors and editors
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia EN

Mountain yellow-legged frog: Brief Summary ( الإنجليزية )

المقدمة من wikipedia EN

The mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa), also known as the southern mountain yellow-legged frog, is a species of true frog endemic to California in the United States. It occurs in the San Jacinto Mountains, San Bernardino Mountains, and San Gabriel Mountains in Southern California and the Southern Sierra Nevada. It is a federally listed endangered species, separated into two distinct population segments (DPS): a northern DPS, listed endangered in 2014, and a southern DPS that was listed endangered in 2002.

Populations formerly classified as Rana muscosa in the northern Sierra Nevada have since been redescribed as a new species: Rana sierrae, the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog. The Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog has also been classified as a federally endangered species since 2014. The mountains separating the headwaters of the South Fork and Middle Fork of the Kings River mark the boundary between the ranges of the two species.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Wikipedia authors and editors
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia EN

Rana muscosa ( الإسبانية، القشتالية )

المقدمة من wikipedia ES

La rana de montaña de patas amarillas (Rana muscosa) es una especie de anfibio anuro de la familia Ranidae. Se trata de una pequeña rana de unos 5 a 7,5 cm. La parte baja de su abdomen y la parte de abajo de sus patas traseras es de color amarillo o naranja, y tiene un color amarillento o rojizo en su dorso, con puntos o manchas negras, o marrones. Los especímenes jóvenes tienen menos color bajo sus patas. Cuando se las manipula huelen a ajo. Se distribuye por el sur de California. Estas ranas prefieren los hábitat de lagos o arroyos de montaña.

Referencias

  1. Geoffrey Hammerson (2008). «Rana muscosa». Lista Roja de especies amenazadas de la UICN 2010.2 (en inglés). ISSN 2307-8235. Consultado el 31 de agosto de 2010.

 title=
ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Autores y editores de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia ES

Rana muscosa: Brief Summary ( الإسبانية، القشتالية )

المقدمة من wikipedia ES

La rana de montaña de patas amarillas (Rana muscosa) es una especie de anfibio anuro de la familia Ranidae. Se trata de una pequeña rana de unos 5 a 7,5 cm. La parte baja de su abdomen y la parte de abajo de sus patas traseras es de color amarillo o naranja, y tiene un color amarillento o rojizo en su dorso, con puntos o manchas negras, o marrones. Los especímenes jóvenes tienen menos color bajo sus patas. Cuando se las manipula huelen a ajo. Se distribuye por el sur de California. Estas ranas prefieren los hábitat de lagos o arroyos de montaña.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Autores y editores de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia ES

Rana muscosa ( الباسكية )

المقدمة من wikipedia EU

Rana muscosa Rana generoko animalia da. Anfibioen barruko Ranidae familian sailkatuta dago, Anura ordenan.

Erreferentziak

Ikus, gainera

(RLQ=window.RLQ||[]).push(function(){mw.log.warn("Gadget "ErrefAurrebista" was not loaded. Please migrate it to use ResourceLoader. See u003Chttps://eu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berezi:Gadgetaku003E.");});
ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Wikipediako egileak eta editoreak
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia EU

Rana muscosa: Brief Summary ( الباسكية )

المقدمة من wikipedia EU

Rana muscosa Rana generoko animalia da. Anfibioen barruko Ranidae familian sailkatuta dago, Anura ordenan.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Wikipediako egileak eta editoreak
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia EU

Rana muscosa ( الفرنسية )

المقدمة من wikipedia FR

Rana muscosa, la Grenouille des montagnes à pattes jaunes, est une espèce d'amphibiens de la famille des Ranidae[1].

Répartition et habitat

Cette espèce est endémique du Sud de la Californie aux États-Unis. Elle est présente entre 370 et 2 290 m d'altitude dans la sierra Nevada, les monts San Gabriel, San Bernardino et San Jacinto[1],[2], et donc dans les contés de San Diego, de Riverside, de Los Angeles et de San Bernardino.

Cette espèce vit dans les prairies humides, au bord des cours d'eau et des lacs[3].

Description

Rana muscosa mesure de 50 à 75 mm. Son dos est jaunâtre ou rougeâtre avec une pigmentation ou des taches noires ou brunes. Son abdomen et le dessous de ses pattes postérieures est jaune ou orange. Les jeunes ont les pattes moins colorées[3].

Publication originale

  • Camp, 1917 : Notes on the systematic status of the toads and frogs of California. University of California Publications in Zoology, vol. 17, p. 115-125 (texte intégral).

Notes et références

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Auteurs et éditeurs de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia FR

Rana muscosa: Brief Summary ( الفرنسية )

المقدمة من wikipedia FR

Rana muscosa, la Grenouille des montagnes à pattes jaunes, est une espèce d'amphibiens de la famille des Ranidae.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Auteurs et éditeurs de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia FR

Rana muscosa ( الجاليكية )

المقدمة من wikipedia gl Galician

Rana muscosa [1] é unha especie de ránido endémica de California. Vive nas Montañas de San Jacinto, Montañas de San Bernardino e Montañas de San Gabriel do sur de California e no sur de Sierra Nevada. Está na lista federal de especies en perigo.[2]

As poboacións de R. muscosa do norte de Sierra Nevada foron redescritas como unha nova especie, co nome Rana sierrae.[2] As montañas que separan as cabeceiras dos ríos de South Fork e Middle Fork do río Kings marcan a fronteira entre as áreas de distribución das dúas especies.[1]

Descrición

 src=
Rana muscosa

Rana muscosa mide de 4 a 8,9 cm de longo. A súa cor e debuxo son variables. É amarelada, acastañada ou oliva con marcas negras e marróns. O seu nome específico, muscosa, significa 'musgosa' en latín, inspirado pola súa coloración que lembra os musgos. Pode ter coxas amarelas ou laranxas. Cando se colle na man emite un cheiro defensivo que lembra ao do allo.[3]

Hábitat

Vive en regatos de montaña, lagos e ribeiras de lagos, ríos e lagoas, preferindo as áreas solleiras. Raramente sae da auga e pode permanecer mergullada durante longo tempo, probablemente por intercambio gasoso cutáneo. Os cágados necesitan un hábitat de auga permanente polo menos durante dous anos mentres se desenvolven. Detectouse a presenza desta ra en alturas entre 370 e 2.300 m no sur de California.[1]

Bioloxía

 src=
Estadio de cágado.

Emerxe do seu sitio de invernada pouco despois da fusión das neves. A súa estación reprodutora empeza unha vez que pasa o período co fluxo de fusión máis alto, aproximadamente de marzo a maio na parte sur da súa área, e ata xullo nas altas montañas do norte. A fertilización é externa e o grupo de ovos é asegurado á vexetaión nunha corrente de auga ou ás veces poden deixalo flotando libremente en augas tranquilas. Os xuvenís poden ser cágados durante 3 ou 4 anos antes de sufrir a metamorfose.[3]

Esta especie carece de saco vocal. A súa chamada é áspera, elevándose ao final. Durante o día fai as chamadas debaixo da auga.[3]

Aliméntase de insectos como escaravellos, formigas, abellas, avespas, moscas e libélulas. Tamén pode comer cágados.[3]

Satus de conservación

É unha especie en perigo segundo a Lei de especies en perigo de EUA. A Unión Internacional para a Conservación da Natureza (IUCN) tamén a ten na súa lista de especies en perigo.[1] O seu status de conservación NatureServe é en risco (imperiled).[4]

Declive das poboacións

Mountain Yellow-Legged frog.jpg

Aínda que antes era unha especie común, Rana muscosa estivo ausente de gran parte da súa área nativa desde a década de 1970. Nos últimos cen anos o 90% das súas poboacións foron eliminadas.[5] Esta ra localizárase en 166 lugares das montañas do sur de California, pero en 2007 só quedaban en sete ou oito.[1] O descubrimento en 2009 de R. muscosa en dous lugares do Bosque Nacional de San Bernardino foi unha boa nova.[6] Agora está representada en Sierra Nevada por tres ou catro poboacións.[1] O seu declive atribúese a moitos factores, como as especies introducidas de peixes como a troita, gando que pasta,[7] o fungo quitridio infeccioso Batrachochitridium[8] e probablemente pesticidas, seca e radiación ultravioleta.[7]

Especies de peixes introducidas

As troitas foron introducidas en lagos e ríos de Sierra Nevada a finais da década de 1800 para incrementar a pesca recreativa na área. O peixe come os cágados como unha presa principal. As troitas introducidas cambiaron a distribución de varias especies nativas nos ecosistemas locais.[5] Despois da eliminación de peixes de varios lagos, a ra reapareceu e as súas poboacións incrementáronse.[5] Despois empezou a espallarse a outros hábitats axeitados próximos.[9]

Pesticidas

O declive desta ra na súa área de distribución histórica foi asociada coa difusión de pesticidas desde áreas agrícolas.[10][11] Os espécimes que foron reintroducidos en corpos de auga dos que se retiraron os peixes non conseguiron sobrevivir e as análises realizadas atoparon pesticidas nos seus tecidos.[12] Os pesticidas son considerados por algunhas autoridades como unha ameaza maior para as ras que as troitas.[13] O papel relativo que xogan os pesticidas e os peixes introducidos no declive das ras aínda se debate e a perda de R. muscosa na súa antiga área foi probablemente influída por múltiples factores.[12]

Quitridiomicose

 src=
Rana muscosa

Esta especie é un dos moitos anfibios afectados pola enfermidade fúnxica quitridiomicose. Fixéronse amplas investigacións sobre a bioloxía do fungo causante e como impedir o declive nas poboacións de anfibios.[8] O fungo ataca as áreas queratinizadas do corpo das ras. Os cágados non están gravemente afectados porque as súas únicas partes fortemente queratinizadas son as súas vaíñas mandibulares e filas de dentes.[14] A infección dos cágados pode identificarse por cambios na pigmentación desas partes.[15] Os adultos teñen unha pel rica en queratina e sofren peores infeccións.

Fixéronse estudos nos que ras adultas sas foron expostas á compaña de ras infectadas durante polo menos dúas semanas e desenvolveron a enfermidade. O contaxio require máis tempo nos cágados, xeralmente unhas sete semanas.[15] As ras poden estar predispostas á infección se os seus sistemas inmunitarios están debilitados ou por outros factores, como os pesticidas.[16] Os estudos realizados indican que R. muscosa é de forma natural máis susceptible ao fungo quitridio que moitas outras ras.[17]

Conservación

A primeira reprodución en catividade con éxito destas ras ocorreu en 2009 cando se criaron tres cágados no Zoo de San Diego. Os traballadores conservacionistas do zoo planearon a liberación das ras sobreviventes da crianza en catividade na súa área nativa das Montañas de San Jacinto.[18][19]

En 2015 ras e cágados da especie foron reintroducidos en Fuller Mill Creek nas Montañas de San Bernardino e no Bosque Nacional de San Bernardino.[20] Foron cruzados e criados polo Centro Arnold e Mabel Beckman para a Investigación da Conservación en Escondido, California, unha das organizacións que se asociou co Instituto para a Investigación da Conservación do Zoo de San Diego (ICR) para salvar a especie da extinción.[20] O Zoo de Los Ángeles é tamén un asociado e actualmente alberga dous grupos de cágados recollidos na natureza en dúas localidades das Montañas de San Gabriel, ata que crezan dabondo como para que soporten a liberación en condicións naturais.[20]

En 2015, o Zoo de Oakland empezou un proxecto de rehabilitación da ra para axudar nos esforzos de salvar a especie.[21] Cada ano, recóllese un grupo de cágados dos seus lagos nativos de California e lévanse ao zoo. Alí, os cágados crecen ata ser ras novas, mentres que tamén se someten a un proceso de inoculación para volvelas inmunes ao fungo da quitridiomicose. Cando están xa listas, as ras xuvenís inmunes a este fungo quitridio son liberadas nos lagos de onde procedían. En 2016, o Zoo de Oakland liberou 53 espécimes en varios lagos nos Parques Nacionais do Canón do Kings e Sequoia.[22] O programa prevé liberar 130 individuos inoculados en lagos dos Parques Nacionais do Canón do Kings e Sequoia e do Bosque Nacional Inyo en 2017.

Notas

  1. 1,0 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 Hammerson, G. (2008). Rana muscosa. En: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Consultado o 05 de agosto de 2013.
  2. 2,0 2,1 Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa), United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
  3. 3,0 3,1 3,2 3,3 Rana muscosa - Southern Mountain Yellow-legged Frog, California Herps: A Guide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of California. 2013.
  4. Rana muscosa, NatureServe. 2012.
  5. 5,0 5,1 5,2 Knapp, R. A., et al. (2007). "Removal of nonnative fish results in population expansion of a declining amphibian (mountain yellow-legged frog, Rana muscosa)' Biological Conservation 135(1):11-20.
  6. Nearly extinct California frog rediscovered. NBC News. July 24, 2009.
  7. 7,0 7,1 Vredenburg, V. The Mountain Yellow-legged Frog - Can They be Saved? Arquivado 20 de abril de 2019 en Wayback Machine. Sierra Nature Notes Volume 1. January, 2001.
  8. 8,0 8,1 The Amphibian Chytrid Fungus and Chytridiomycosis. Arquivado 21 de febreiro de 2009 en Wayback Machine. Amphibianark.org. Retrieved 04 August 2013.
  9. Vredenburg, V. T. (2004). Reversing introduced species effects: experimental removal of introduced fish leads to rapid recovery of a declining frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(20):7646-50.
  10. Davidson, Carlos; Shaffer, H. Bradley & Jennings, Mark R. "Spatial tests of the pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines". Conservation Biology 16 (6): 1588–1601. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01030.x.
  11. Davidson, Carlos. "Declining downwind: amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use". Ecological Applications 14 (6): 1892–1902. doi:10.1890/03-5224.
  12. 12,0 12,1 Davidson, Carlos & Knapp, Roland A. "Multiple stressors and amphibian declines: dual impacts of pesticides and fish on yellow-legged frogs". Ecological Applications 17 (2): 587–597. doi:10.1890/06-0181.
  13. Taylor, Sharon K.; Williams, Elizabeth S. & Mills, Ken W. "Effects of malathion on disease susceptibility in Woodhouse's toads". Journal of Wildlife Diseases 35 (3): 536–541. PMID 10479088. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-35.3.536.
  14. Andre, S. E., et al. (2008). Effect of temperature on host response to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis infection in the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). Arquivado 2013-08-05 en Archive.is Journal of Wildlife Diseases 44(3):716-20.
  15. 15,0 15,1 Rachowicz, L. J. and V. T. Vredenburg. (2004). Transmission of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis within and between amphibian life stages. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 61:75-83.
  16. Rachowicz, L. J., et al. (2006). Emerging infectious disease as a proximate cause of amphibian mass mortality. Ecology 87(7), 1671-83.
  17. Rollins-Smith, L. A., et al. (2006). Antimicrobial peptide defenses of the mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa). Developmental & Comparative Immunology 30(9):831-42.
  18. Mountain Yellow-legged Frog Hopping for Survival. Arquivado 13 de maio de 2013 en Wayback Machine. San Diego Zoo Global.
  19. "Precious Cargo: Brighter Future For 100 Juvenile Mountain Yellow Legged Frogs, Tadpoles". U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. November 7, 2016. Consultado o January 1, 2017.
  20. 20,0 20,1 20,2 SoCal Wild.com: "Building a Mountain Frogtown for Yellow-Legged Frogs"; Brenda Rees, editor; 10 August 2015.
  21. "Oakland Zoo". www.oaklandzoo.org. Arquivado dende o orixinal o 30 de xullo de 2017. Consultado o 2017-07-13.
  22. "From the Brink of Extinction: Oakland Zoo Releases Critically Endangered Frogs into the Wild : The Outdoor Wire". www.theoutdoorwire.com. Consultado o 2017-07-13.

Véxase tamén

Bibliografía

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia gl Galician

Rana muscosa: Brief Summary ( الجاليكية )

المقدمة من wikipedia gl Galician

Rana muscosa é unha especie de ránido endémica de California. Vive nas Montañas de San Jacinto, Montañas de San Bernardino e Montañas de San Gabriel do sur de California e no sur de Sierra Nevada. Está na lista federal de especies en perigo.

As poboacións de R. muscosa do norte de Sierra Nevada foron redescritas como unha nova especie, co nome Rana sierrae. As montañas que separan as cabeceiras dos ríos de South Fork e Middle Fork do río Kings marcan a fronteira entre as áreas de distribución das dúas especies.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia gl Galician

Rana muscosa ( البلجيكية الهولندية )

المقدمة من wikipedia NL

Herpetologie

Rana muscosa is een kikker uit de familie echte kikkers of Ranidae.[2] De soort werd voor het eerst wetenschappelijk beschreven door Charles Lewis Camp in 1917. Oorspronkelijk werd de wetenschappelijke naam Rana boylii muscosa gebruikt.

Uiterlijke kenmerken

De kleur is grijsgroen tot bruin met donkere groene of bruine vlekken en bijna zwarte kleine vlekjes op de onderzijde van de flanken. De twee huidplooien langs de zijkanten steken iets uit en de toppen van vingers en tenen zijn zwart. Het belangrijkste kenmerk is de gele tot oranje onderzijde van de achterpoten. Soms is ook het achterste deel van de buik geel tot oranje gekleurd. Deze kleuren dienen om vijanden af te schrikken bij een aanval; als de kikker wegspringt komt ineens de felle kleur tevoorschijn die een predator even kan doen aarzelen waardoor de kikker kan ontsnappen.

Verspreiding en habitat

Rana muscosa leeft in het hoger gelegen deel van de Sierra Nevadabergketen in de Verenigde Staten.[3] De paring vindt plaats van mei tot augustus, vlak nadat de meertjes en stroompjes ijsvrij zijn. De zwart gepigmenteerde eitjes worden in kleine groepjes gelegd en aan waterplanten vastgeplakt.

Levenswijze

Deze soort is dagactief en vangt kleine ongewervelden zoals insecten. Bij verstoring wordt een licht irriterende stof verspreidt die qua reuk aan knoflook doet denken. Ook de knoflookpad (Pelobates fuscus) kent een dergelijke verdediging, maar deze soort leeft in Europa.

Referenties
  1. (en) Rana muscosa op de IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
  2. Darrel R. Frost - Amphibian Species of the World: an online reference - Version 6.0 - American Museum of Natural History, Rana muscosa.
  3. University of California - AmphibiaWeb, Rana muscosa.
Bronnen
  • (en) - Darrel R. Frost - Amphibian Species of the World: an online reference - Version 6.0 - American Museum of Natural History - Rana muscosa - Website Geconsulteerd 10 februari 2017
  • (en) - University of California - AmphibiaWeb - Rana muscosa - Website
ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Wikipedia-auteurs en -editors
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia NL

Rana muscosa: Brief Summary ( البلجيكية الهولندية )

المقدمة من wikipedia NL

Rana muscosa is een kikker uit de familie echte kikkers of Ranidae. De soort werd voor het eerst wetenschappelijk beschreven door Charles Lewis Camp in 1917. Oorspronkelijk werd de wetenschappelijke naam Rana boylii muscosa gebruikt.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Wikipedia-auteurs en -editors
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia NL

Rana muscosa ( البرتغالية )

المقدمة من wikipedia PT

Rana muscosa é uma pequena espécie de com um tamanho de 5 a 7,5 cm. A parte inferior de abdómen e a parte inferior das patas traseiras é de cor amarela ou laranja, e o dorso é de cor amarelada ou avermelhada, com manchas negras ou castanhas. Os juvenis são menos coloridos na parte de baixo das patas. Quando manuseadas, deitam cheiro a alho.

Estas rãs preferem os habitats lacustres ou riachos de montanha.

Referências

  • A Field Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of Coastal Southern California, Robert N. Fisher and Ted J. Case, USGS, [1].
 title=
ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia PT

Rana muscosa: Brief Summary ( البرتغالية )

المقدمة من wikipedia PT

Rana muscosa é uma pequena espécie de com um tamanho de 5 a 7,5 cm. A parte inferior de abdómen e a parte inferior das patas traseiras é de cor amarela ou laranja, e o dorso é de cor amarelada ou avermelhada, com manchas negras ou castanhas. Os juvenis são menos coloridos na parte de baixo das patas. Quando manuseadas, deitam cheiro a alho.

Estas rãs preferem os habitats lacustres ou riachos de montanha.

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
Autores e editores de Wikipedia
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia PT

黃腿山蛙 ( الصينية )

المقدمة من wikipedia 中文维基百科

黄腿山蛙学名Rana muscosa)是极危物种已列入美国联邦濒危物种(the federal Endangered Species List)和世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录[2]科学专家曾估计,目前在野外只剩下了122只黄腿山蛙。

2009年6月10日美国地质局的一组人员看到了黄腿山蛙。他们当时正在洛杉矶以南的一处地区搜寻。这处地段以前曾经有大量的黄腿山蛙,但是50年来一直没有人再见到过它们的踪影。两个星期过后,圣迭哥自然历史博物馆的一组人员在四公里以外的地方又看到了另一只黄腿山蛙。这种珍稀的青蛙一般不会四处活动,因此,科研人员相信,这意味着在新近看到的两只青蛙之间的小溪地带,可能生活着大批的这种青蛙。[3]

参考文献

Voice of America Logo.svg 本文全部或部分内容来自美国联邦政府所属的美国之音网站。根据版权条款(英文)和有关美国政府作品版权的相关法律,其官方发布的内容属于公有领域

 title=
ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
维基百科作者和编辑
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia 中文维基百科

黃腿山蛙: Brief Summary ( الصينية )

المقدمة من wikipedia 中文维基百科

黄腿山蛙(学名:Rana muscosa)是极危物种已列入美国联邦濒危物种(the federal Endangered Species List)和世界自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录。科学专家曾估计,目前在野外只剩下了122只黄腿山蛙。

2009年6月10日美国地质局的一组人员看到了黄腿山蛙。他们当时正在洛杉矶以南的一处地区搜寻。这处地段以前曾经有大量的黄腿山蛙,但是50年来一直没有人再见到过它们的踪影。两个星期过后,圣迭哥自然历史博物馆的一组人员在四公里以外的地方又看到了另一只黄腿山蛙。这种珍稀的青蛙一般不会四处活动,因此,科研人员相信,这意味着在新近看到的两只青蛙之间的小溪地带,可能生活着大批的这种青蛙。

ترخيص
cc-by-sa-3.0
حقوق النشر
维基百科作者和编辑
النص الأصلي
زيارة المصدر
موقع الشريك
wikipedia 中文维基百科