-
This specimen keys to L. albicaulis as per the Jepson manual (first edition, 1993)given narrow banner and wing petals and uncovered keel tip. This taxon does not in fact appear in Matt Lavin's plant list (Floristics of the Upper Walker River, 1983). An argument could be made that this is L. andersonii instead.
-
This specimen keys to L. albicaulis as per the Jepson manual (first edition, 1993)given narrow banner and wing petals and uncovered keel tip. This taxon does not in fact appear in Matt Lavin's plant list (Floristics of the Upper Walker River, 1983). An argument could be made that this is L. andersonii instead.
-
This specimen keys to L. albicaulis as per the Jepson manual (first edition, 1993)given narrow banner and wing petals and uncovered keel tip. This taxon does not in fact appear in Matt Lavin's plant list (Floristics of the Upper Walker River, 1983). An argument could be made that this is L. andersonii instead.
-
This specimen keys to L. albicaulis as per the Jepson manual (first edition, 1993)given narrow banner and wing petals and uncovered keel tip. This taxon does not in fact appear in Matt Lavin's plant list (Floristics of the Upper Walker River, 1983). An argument could be made that this is L. andersonii instead.
-
This specimen keys to L. albicaulis as per the Jepson manual (first edition, 1993)given narrow banner and wing petals and uncovered keel tip. This taxon does not in fact appear in Matt Lavin's plant list (Floristics of the Upper Walker River, 1983). An argument could be made that this is L. andersonii instead.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
