Background
Common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) is a small deciduous tree or large shrub that can grow to six meters in height. It has dull green oval or egg shaped leaves and is easily identified by the small thorns at the tip of its branches. It is also known as European buckthorn, European waythorn, and Hart’s thorn. Common buckthorn is considered an invasive species throughout most of the northeastern and central United States and southeastern Canada because of the dense thickets it forms.
Origin
Common buckthorn is native to most of Europe (except Iceland and Turkey) and western Asia. It was brought to North America some time in the 1800s for use as an ornamental shrub and wind break but did not have wide spread distribution until the early 1900s. It is found in hedgerows, along roadsides and on ravine slopes.
Biology and Identification
Common buckthorn is a perennial shrub or small tree. It is found in lightly shaded areas and is tolerant of many soil types from well-drained sand to clay. Branches are tipped with a short thorn; a thorn may also be found in the fork between two branches. The leaves may be opposite or in an alternating pattern (both may be found on the same branch). The leaves are oval or egg shaped with small, serrated teeth. The leaf may be a dull green or a dark green with a lighter green on the under side. Flowers are small with four sepals (a modified leaf that encloses the petals and other parts of the flower) and four petals and they form small clusters from the axils (the space between a leaf or branch and the stem/stalk of the plant) of leaves or on short twigs along the stem. The flowers are a yellowish to green color. Each flower is unisexual with either four stamens or one pistil with a plant being either male or female (dioecious). The fruit or berries are small (5-6 mm in diameter) and are a dark purplish or black color. Each berry will contain four hard seeds. The common buckthorn flowers during late spring (May-June) while leaves are emerging. The berries ripen during August and September and can be found still attached to the plant throughout the winter.
Common buckthorn leaves may be opposite or alternating with both possible on the same branch. Leaves are oval or egg shaped with small, serrated teeth Buckthorn seeds are easily spread by birds and other wildlife. It is fast growing and will reproduce from seeds or by stump sprouting. The seeds may remain viable in the soil for up to five years. Common buckthorn can be distinguished from native and other non-native buckthorns by its sharp, thorn-tipped branches and from native Hawthorns (Crataegus spp.) on which the thorns grow from the sides of branches. It also has noticeable forward-curved side veins on its leaves and clusters of purplish-black berries that have 4 hard seeds.
Impacts
Common buckthorns form thick hedges with long branches that crowd out and shade out native shrub and herbaceous species, preventing regeneration of native plants. In fire prone areas the lack of herbaceous ground cover underneath the buckthorn hedge may prevent fires from spreading. The common buckthorn is a host for the crown rust fungus (Puccinia coronata), an agricultural pest that inhibits the yield and quality of oats. It may also serve as a overwintering host for the Asian soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura), a pest known to damage soybeans and can spread a variety of horticultural viruses. Buckthorn leaves have a high concentration of nitrogen and the decomposition of leaf litter changes soil nitrogen content and can increase the pH levels in the soil. These changes create better growth conditions for the common buckthorn perpetuating their persistence.
Prevention and Control
There are several methods available for control of common buckthorn. These controls include mowing, excavation, cutting and burning. Repeated mowing and cutting has been shown to reduce the vigor of the plants. The plants may be removed by hand or with heavy equipment depending on the size of the shrubs. Care should be taken to not disturb the roots of other plants. The disturbed area, now devoid of the invasive plant, may become the home for new common buckthorn seedlings or other opportunistic invasive plants. As noted earlier, the seeds may persist in the ground for five years resulting in new growth. Prescribed burns are another way to control buckthorns in fire-adapted ecosystems. Fires will top-kill mature plants; however sprouting can occur from the roots and trunks. There are also several chemical methods (Table 1) available for controlling common buckthorn. These are generally applied to the stumps after cutting to prevent sprouting. There are no currently known biological controls for common buckthorn. Research into biological controls for common buckthorn is in progress.
Common buckthorn is a large shrub [6,35,38,68,77,77,200,202] or small tree [38,54,68,77,200,242]. It is a polymorphic species within its native range, likely due to hybridization with other buckthorns [120]. In North America, common buckthorn is described as a large, coarse shrub [26,200], often as wide as high [202], with many stems [71] and many branches [77,202], or with a single main stem and ascending branches [35] (see Plant architecture and stand structure). The shrub form typically ranges from about 3 to 13 feet (1-4 m) tall [6,35,77,202], sometimes up to 16 to 20 feet (5-6 m) [38,68,77,200]. The tree form typically reaches about 16 to 26 feet (5-8 m) tall [38,54,68,77,200,242] and 4 inches (10 cm) in diameter [54]. Common buckthorn individuals are typically less than 13 feet (4 m) tall in Canada [175]. A common buckthorn tree reached 61 feet (~19 m) tall in Ann Arbor, Michigan [48]. Mature common buckthorn plants have long, somewhat angled shoots [175] with branches forming almost right angles with the main stem [71]. Branchlets are stout [200] and semirigid [202], 1.5 to 2 mm in diameter, and slightly flattened [202]. Many branches end in a single, small thorn [35,38,54,68,200,230] ranging from 0.2 to 0.9 inch (0.5-2.2 cm) long [175]. Young common buckthorn bark is smooth [202]; older bark is somewhat scaly [71,202] or fissured [71].
Common buckthorn leaves are simple and occur near branch tips [35]. Leaves range from 0.6 to 2.8 inches (1.5-7 cm) long [35,38,68,77,202,225,230,242] or longer [175,200] and 0.4 to 2.8 inches (0.9-7 cm) wide [38,77,175,200,202,230,242]. Leaves are mostly deciduous [71] but often remain green and do not fall until late autumn (see Seasonal Development).
Common buckthorn is typically dioecious (see Pollination and breeding system), and flowers are functionally unisexual and 4-merous [38,175,242]). Flowers are small and inconspicuous [35] and occur in dense clusters [71,200] on branches of the current season [77,202]. Staminate flowers occur in axillary clusters of 2 to 8 flowers [77,202] (up to 40 [175]). Pistillate flowers occur in clusters of about 2 to 15 [77,202] (up to 30 [175]). Common buckthorn fruits occur singly or in clusters. If clustered they occur at nodes on the end of short spur branches [202] or at the base of leafstalks [35]. The fruit is a globose drupe [55,71,77,156,225,242], ranging from 5 to 10 mm in diameter [35,38,71,77,202,230,242] and usually bearing 4 seeds [35,38,68,77,202,230], but ranging from 1 to 5 seeds per fruit [175]. Seeds are 4 to 5 mm long [77,175,202].
Dahurian buckthorn is morphologically very similar to common buckthorn, although the branches of Dahurian buckthorn are more stout [48,202], the shrubs less densely branched [202], and the leaves longer and more uniformly shaped [48]. Most Dahurian buckthorn individuals in North America are smaller in stature than common buckthorn, typically reaching 8 feet (2.5 m) in height [202]. Dahurian buckthorn may be taller in its native range. The Flora of Japan [56] describes it as a shrub or small tree 13 to 16 feet (4-5 m) tall, and the Flora of China [242] says that it may reach 33 feet (10 m) tall. A North American landscaping manual describes Dahurian buckthorn as a spreading shrub or small tree reaching 25 to 30 feet (7.6-9 m) tall [48], presumably under cultivation. Only one other detailed description of Dahurian buckthorn [202] was found in the available literature from North America as of 2010. Dahurian buckthorn was described as an open shrub, with single or clustered trunks, medium-hard wood, and trunk bark that often peels back from around old limb scars. Twigs are 2 to 2.5 mm in diameter, flattened, rigid, smooth [202], and occasionally ending in a short spine [48,56,202]. The Flora of China describes Dahurian buckthorn as unarmed and much branched [242].
Dahurian buckthorn's leaves are deciduous [56], simple, glabrous, opposite [202] or partially opposite [56], fascicled [242], and typically more than 2 times as long as wide [138]. In North America, Dahurian buckthorn leaves are described as 2.8 to 4 inches (7-10 cm) long and 0.8 to 1.2 inches (2-3 cm) wide [202]. Descriptions from its native range indicate slightly larger leaves: 1.6 to 5 inches (4-13 cm) long and 0.8 to 2.4 inches (2-6 cm) wide [56,242]. Broad-leaved Dahurian buckthorn individuals may be R. davurica subsp. davurica, while the narrow-leaved plants may be R. davurica subsp. nipponica [77].
Flowers of Dahurian buckthorn are unisexual and occur on short pedicels, 6 to 10 mm long, in axillary clusters on new growth [56,202], or on short shoots [56,242]. Staminate flowers are numerous [56] and less than about 0.4 inch (1 cm) in diameter [202,242]; pistillate flowers are few and are slightly smaller than staminate flowers, 4 to 5 mm in diameter [56]. Dahurian buckthorn fruits are drupes, 5 to 8 mm diameter, with 2 seeds ranging from 5 to 6 mm long and 3.6 to 3.7 mm wide [56,202,242].
A description of Dahurian buckthorn's belowground morphology was not found in the available literature as of 2010.
Preventing postfire establishment and spread: In areas where common buckthorn is established, it is likely to persist after fire by sprouting and seedling establishment. Information regarding postfire establishment of common buckthorn in areas where it did not occur before fire is lacking. According to a Vermont Agency for Natural Resources fact sheet, fire may "encourage buckthorn infestation" in some cases [223]; however, no details are provided. Common buckthorn may be dispersed from nearby, off-site sources after fire, especially if perches are available to facilitate dispersal by birds.
Preventing invasive plants from establishing in weed-free burned areas is the most effective and least costly management method. This may be accomplished through early detection and eradication, careful monitoring and follow-up, and limiting dispersal of invasive plant propagules into burned areas. General recommendations for preventing postfire establishment and spread of invasive plants include:
For more detailed information on these topics, see the following publications: [27,73,218].
Use of prescribed fire as a control agent: In fire-adapted communities where fire has been excluded and common buckthorn has invaded, repeated prescribed fires may help restore presettlement FIRE REGIMES and stand structures and encourage reproduction and persistence of fire-adapted native species. It is often suggested that a regime of frequent fires can reduce common buckthorn abundance in invaded communities [78,90,199], and this has been demonstrated in a former bur oak-white oak savanna community in the East Woods of the Morton Arboretum, Illinois [22]. Adequate fuels must exist for prescribed burning to impact common buckthorn (see IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT). Unfortunately, changes in invaded communities due, in part, to common buckthorn invasion may make them difficult to burn (see Fuels and FIRE REGIMES). A fact sheet suggests that seedlings and saplings in dense common buckthorn stands may be cut and left on site, creating fuel for future fires [237]. Repeated fires may facilitate development of the herbaceous fuel layer in some fire-adapted plant communities [76,113], either through establishment from the soil seed bank or with postfire seeding of desirable species. Fire frequency is an important consideration, as annual fires may not allow adequate build-up of surface fuels and may have adverse impacts on litter invertebrates [25]. When used as part of an integrated management approach, fire may help reduce common buckthorn abundance by top-killing existing shrubs and trees and by depleting the common buckthorn seed bank (see Integrated management with prescribed fire).
While some common buckthorn control may be evident after one fire [90], a single fire does not provide effective control [4,20,83,164] unless used in combination with other control efforts (see below). A spring fire in an oak savanna in Minnesota killed common buckthorn seedlings, which were unable to sprout after fire. However, mature trees were only top-killed and survived by sprouting [20]. The first season after a fall prescribed fire in a mixed-hardwood forest (developed from a mesic savanna) in Illinois, common buckthorn seedlings were reduced by more than 50%, but only 10% of 2- to 4-inch (5-10 cm) diameter common buckthorn stems were top-killed. Common buckthorn sprouting rate was 30 times greater in burned versus unburned plots based on averages per tree stem [4,83]. Information on postfire seedling establishment of common buckthorn was not given in this study.
Published management guidelines recommend repeated annual or biennial prescribed fires for 5 to 6 years or more for control of common buckthorn [15,78,90,113,199,237], although none of these authors provide specific examples to demonstrate that frequent fire alone provides effective control of common buckthorn. It is also recommended that frequent fire not be used if the native community would be adversely affected [90]. Prescribed fires can kill common buckthorn seedlings and stimulate the native herbaceous understory. Fire may kill larger common buckthorn saplings, but they typically sprout. Burns conducted on a 2- to 3-year cycle may control common buckthorn but can also kill native woody seedlings [157]. Research in oak woodlands at the Morton Arboretum in Illinois shows that common buckthorn was among the most abundant woody species before and after 17 years of annual, dormant-season prescribed fire. However, density of common buckthorn in smaller size classes was substantially lower on burned sites [22]:
Prefire (1986) and postfire (2002) stem densities of common buckthorn in small size classes in annually burned plots of the East Woods of the Morton Arboretum. Stems <2.5 cm diameter were >1 m tall [22]. Year Size class <2.5 cm ≥2.5-5 cm >5-10 cm 1986 1,200 1,680 40 2002 42 20 54Common buckthorn was among the dominant groundlayer plants in pretreatment plots, with a mean relative cover of 3.24% on burn plots in 1986 (prefire). It was not among the dominant species in the ground layer of burned plots in 2002 [22], suggesting that seedlings were killed and unable to establish in a regime of annual fires. Results of this research indicate that annual prescribed fires can eliminate most shrub and small sapling canopy cover, increase canopy openness, and promote greater richness and cover of forbs. Tradeoffs include a loss of native vines, shrubs, understory trees and forest interior bird habitat, as well as persistence of nonnative plants including common buckthorn and garlic mustard. See the Research Paper by Bowles and others [22] for details of this study. Additional research in the same study sites shows significantly fewer springtail species in areas burned annually for 16 years (P<0.01), though the effects of fire on springtail density varied among individual species. To maintain the richness of litter invertebrates in areas where prescribed fire is used, the author suggests burning every 2 or 3 years instead of annually, and/or creating refuge areas (unburned patches) to enhance invertebrate survival [25]. After 10 years of adaptive management using prescribed fire and seeding of native species, Packard [164] notes that frequent fire is an essential part of savanna restoration, but many sites need to be seeded with desirable native species because the native seed bank is depleted (see Integrated management with prescribed fire for details).
Few examples were available in the published literature (as of 2010) of the effects of frequent prescribed fire alone to reduce common buckthorn abundance. In several historic oak savannas in northern Illinois, Indiana, and southern Wisconsin, controlled fires reduced the number of nonnative or mesic species and favored occurrence of prairie and savanna associates. Shrubs and mesic trees were reduced, and cover and richness of herbaceous ground layer species increased. Periodic fire also appeared to favor richness of birds, insects, and spiders. For savanna restoration, the authors suggest relatively frequent fires for several years followed by less frequent burning, with a 5- to 10-year gap, to allow recruitment of new canopy cohorts and to maintain savanna species [4]. At Pipestone National Monument, backfires in early May 1985 injured some small common buckthorn trees (10-15 feet (3-4.5 m) tall and ≤1 inch (2.5 cm) in diameter). The authors suggest that repeated burning would eventually eliminate most common buckthorn in rock outcrop areas [15]. However, prescribed spring burns conducted annually for 5 years from mid- to late April (when cool-season grasses had initiated growth) resulted in no appreciable change in common buckthorn cover, although a few individual common buckthorns were sensitive to fire. Cover of common buckthorn was as follows:
1983: spring 1.4%, summer 2.0%
1984: spring 0.9%, summer 3.0%
1985: spring 2.6%
1987: summer 2.4% [14].
At the Grady Knolls Forest (dominated at the time by hybrid black oak (Q. velutina × Q. ellipsoidalis)) in the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, 2 consecutive years of prescribed fires followed by a year with no fire resulted in a decrease in cover of common buckthorn in each of the burn years, followed by a slight increase in the no-burn year. The prefire shrub layer consisted of nearly continuous, almost impenetrable Bell's honeysuckle and common buckthorn, and the ground layer was sparse. Prescribed fires were carried out under the following conditions [113]:
Burn date 16 April 1990 17 April 1991 Air temperature 50 °F (10 °C) 50 °F (10 °C) Relative humidity (%) 50 to 55 50 to 55 Wind direction/speed SW 5 to 12 mph NE 5 mph Flame heights 15 to 30 cm 15 to 30 cm Area burned (%) 50 60-70Before the first prescribed fire, mean cover of common buckthorn and Bell's honeysuckle (combined) was 85%. The 1st fire reduced nonnative shrub cover to 56% and the 2nd to 38%. The following year there was a slight increase, to 41%. Most of the nonnative shrubs sprouted from the base, but the sprouts were not very "vigorous". Some dead honeysuckles were observed in 1992, but no dead common buckthorn were reported. Hybrid black oak density decreased; there was a large reduction in the number of black oak, white oak, and black cherry saplings; and diversity of the ground layer increased. The authors concluded that prescribed fire can suppress common buckthorn and Bell's honeysuckle, and encourage a more diverse ground layer dominated by native species with enough biomass to help fuel the fires. Eventually, repeated prescribed fires may deplete the root reserves of common buckthorn and Bell's honeysuckle (see Fire timing below), so that sprouting will be the exception. The management plan is to continue prescribed burns to mimic natural processes in oak woodland, not necessarily for eradication of nonnative shrubs [113].
Fire timing: Control treatments for common buckthorn, including prescribed fires, may be most effective if timed to correspond to periods of low levels of root carbohydrates (see Underground phenology). Personal communications from county park managers in Minnesota suggest that the best time to conduct prescribed burning in oak-dominated woodlands where common buckthorn occurs is between late March and early May, when weather conditions are conducive for burning (i.e., low soil moisture, high litter density, less windy conditions, lower native plant density) (Moriarty and Evenson 2001 personal communication cited by [18]). It has been suggested that because common buckthorn's leaves emerge earlier than most native species, and root carbohydrate levels are assumed to be low at that time, a late April or May prescribed fire (when common buckthorn is actively growing, but most native plants are not) is most effective for common buckthorn control (e.g., [15,36]). However, burning may not be possible at these times because groundlayer fuels are sparse [15]. When control treatments (cutting plus herbicide, or cutting alone) were compared across seasons, spring and summer treatments resulted in 4 to 8 times more common buckthorn sprouts in July than when treatments were applied in either fall or winter (P<0.05). Common buckthorn seedling densities in July were similar. Based on reports of seasonal changes in total nonstructural carbohydrates in root tissues, the author suggests cutting during flowering or early fruit development, when carbohydrates are sequestered in these structures. Cutting also interrupts fruit development, thereby reducing seed dispersal and input into the seed bank [18].
Integrated management with prescribed fire: Fire alone, even when repeated annually, does not seem to provide adequate control of common buckthorn. Control may be improved by seeding of native species after prescribed fire, or by using prescribed fire in conjunction with cutting and herbicide treatments.
In areas where dense patches of common buckthorn and other woody species have persisted for many decades, it is likely that the native seed bank has been depleted and that native species will not establish after brush removal. Packard [164] reports on 10 years of work to restore native tallgrass prairie and oak savanna communities in the Chicago area. In spring of 1984, burning in the understory of a bur oak grove, composed mostly of common buckthorn and Tatarian honeysuckle, resulted in top-kill of most common buckthorn and Tatarian honeysuckle. Aside from small sprouts, the understory was entirely open. However, very few seedlings established from the seed bank that summer. After a second, "much hotter" fire and a second summer, only a few seedlings of weedy forbs such as Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), bull thistle (C. vulgare), dandelion (Taraxacum spp.), and burdock (Arctium spp.), established, and they were "increasing exponentially". Seeding native species after fire, using different seed mixes each year until the best mix was found, eventually gave desired results. After 10 years of adaptive management using prescribed fire and seeding of native species, Packard [164] notes that burning once or twice every 3 years is important in the early years of savanna restoration, and that many sites must also be seeded with desirable native species.
A combination of cutting and prescribed burning may control common buckthorn better than prescribed burning alone [78], although common buckthorn may persist indefinitely even with this intensive management approach (e.g., [112]). In plots where common buckthorn was removed and annual prescribed fires were used to control common buckthorn seedlings, herbaceous diversity was twice that of unmanipulated plots. However, some native woody plants were negatively impacted by fire (Moriarty personal communication cited by [116]). Common buckthorn occurred with multiflora rose and gray dogwood in old fields that were being maintained as grassland bird habitat at the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge in Seneca Falls, New York. A treatment that reduced common buckthorn in grasslands consisted of a late spring mowing, allowing cut fuels to cure, and then a late summer fire. Growth rate of common buckthorn sprouts was slower on August-burned plots than on unburned plots or spring-burned plots. Effects may be short-lived, however. Nonstructural carbohydrates in common buckthorn declined after cutting, mowing, or burning treatments but recovered within 1 year [181]. At Wolf Road Prairie, an 82-acre (33 ha) native tallgrass prairie in suburban Chicago, prescribed fires are conducted periodically in spring and fall to control woody shrubs such as common and glossy buckthorn, gray dogwood, and boxelder; and to clear dead winter underbrush, release minerals, and "stimulate" prairie plants. Common buckthorn, Japanese honeysuckle, gray dogwood, and boxelder "do not burn very well", so they are cut with a sickle bar mower before burning. Observations suggest that the diversity and numbers of prairie forbs and grasses have increased in response to these and other management actions begun in the 1970s [121]. Common buckthorn persisted in bur oak savanna in central Minnesota that was managed for 20 to 30 years with a combination of prescribed burning and physical and/or chemical removal of common buckthorn, eastern redcedar, and American elm [112]. No data on common buckthorn abundance were provided, and it is unclear when common buckthorn established on this site.
Management initiated in 1989 on oak woodland sites in Cook County, Illinois, included prescribed burning and cutting and removal of woody plants. Prescribed fires were applied to the site at irregular intervals in either fall or spring. The season of the fire was held constant for each area. Half the study areas were burned once in 7 years; the remaining areas were burned either 2 or 4 times in 7 years. Vegetation was surveyed in 1988 and 1995. On managed sites, nonnative shrubs decreased by 3,139 stems/ha, and native shrubs decreased by 2,635 stems/ha. Common buckthorn decreased from an average of 292 stems/ha in 1988 to 33 stems/ha in 1995. Common buckthorn was not as abundant on the unmanaged site, where common and glossy buckthorns were recorded at the genus level. Density of woody species in all size classes increased and invasive shrubs increased substantially. In the suppressed layer (stems <4.6 feet (1.4 m tall), there were 1,090 buckthorn stems/ha in 1992, and 5,590 buckthorn stems/ha in 1995. The authors note that all were glossy buckthorn in this layer in 1995. In the intermediate layer (stems >4.6 feet (1.4 m) tall but <4.3 inches (11 cm) DBH), 31 buckthorn stems/ha were recorded in 1992, and 205 stems/ha were recorded in 1995. Of those recorded in 1995, 9 were common buckthorn and 196 were glossy buckthorn [122].
Studies on 2 sites at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [191,192,238] followed the response of common buckthorn and other invasive shrubs to various combinations of prescribed burning, cutting, herbicide application, and planting of native species. Invasive shrubs were removed by cutting and herbicide application on both sites between 1992 and 1996. A case study from Lost City Woods suggests that a combination of prescribed burning and planting of groundlayer species may limit common buckthorn reestablishment after removal with cutting and herbicide. Three treatments were evaluated to control common buckthorn reestablishment after initial removal: 1) burning followed by planting with groundlayer species, 2) burning only, and 3) planting only. On 12 November 1996, low-intensity prescribed fires were conducted in burn plots; 2 weeks later, a woodland-savanna mix was hand-seeded into planting plots. That winter, midstory trees were removed to increase the amount of light reaching the ground. In September 1997 burned and planted plots had the fewest common buckthorn seedlings and the greatest abundance of ground-layer species. The untreated control plot had 191 common buckthorn seedlings, the planted-only plot had 143, the burned-only plot had 99, and the burned and planted plot had 6 common buckthorn seedlings. These results suggest that common buckthorn seedlings are susceptible to burning and that fire may facilitate establishment of planted native species. The planted native species also provide surface fuel for future fires [192].
Two additional studies were conducted on the Lost City site and another site, the Grady Kettle Hole Forest, where invasive shrubs had been removed by cutting and herbicide application between 1992 and 1996 [191,238]. Common buckthorn cover and abundance did not differ among 4 treatments (thinning, prescribed burning, deer exclosure, and planting native herbs) at the Lost City and Grady sites, although a combination of thinning and burning was potentially more effective at reducing common buckthorn cover than thinning alone. Thinning alone resulted in the greatest height of nonnative woody seedlings (P<0.05), while other treatments produced results similar to those of controls. Percent cover of planted grasses and forbs was significantly greater in thinned-and-burned plots compared to thinned-and-unburned and control plots (P<0.01) [238].
Using the same plots and similar treatments as Willert [238], Scriver [191] found similar results. Plots were burned in fall of 1997 and 1998 at both sites [238] and in spring of 2000 at Lost City and spring of 2000 and 2001 at Grady, and vegetation was sampled from July to September 2000 and 2001. Fire details were as follows [191]:
Site Lost City Grady Kettle Hole Burn date 3 May 2000 3 May 2000 2 May 2001 Air temperature (°F) mid 70s mid 70s 81 Relative humidity (%) 38 38 63 Wind direction and speed SW at 5 to 10 mph SW at 5 to 10 mph no data Flame heights 2 feet 4 feet no data Fuel consumption 90% of the fuel consumed in 81.3% of the plots 100% of the fuel in 15 of the 16 subplots, and 95% in the remaining subplot 90-100% of the fuel consumed in 38% of the subplots and 65-90% of the fuel consumed in 31% of the subplotsNone of the restoration techniques studied, alone or in combination, prevented reinvasion of common buckthorn. Tree-canopy thinning was the most likely to lead to common buckthorn reinvasion: the average percent cover and average maximum height of common buckthorn increased in thinned plots. Prescribed burning reduced average common buckthorn cover and height on the Grady site in both years (P<0.05). Differences in stem density were not significant at either site in either year. Planting and white-tailed deer exclusion had no significant influence on common buckthorn reinvasion [191].
Prescribed burning in April 2001 following cutting and treating stumps of seed-bearing common buckthorn shrubs with triclopyr in winter 2000 reduced common buckthorn sapling survival and plant height but increased common buckthorn seedling density during the first posttreatment growing season at Battle Creek Regional Park, Minnesota. However, removal of seed-bearing common buckthorn shrubs without follow-up burning also increased common buckthorn seedling densities. Results of additional studies from 2002 to 2004 at Battle Creek and Eagle Lake regional parks suggest that burning in addition to cutting with and without herbicide treatment suppressed common buckthorn sprouting but increased common buckthorn seedling establishment. The author suggests that because burning removed surface litter and suppressed sprouting, soil temperatures and light availability to the soil surface were increased, and this facilitated seedling emergence [18].
Common buckthorn seedling density, sprouts, and density of other species about 15 months after control treatments. Data are means averaged across 2 sites [18] Treated in spring 2002 and measured in July 2003 Treatments Common buckthorn seedling density (plants/ha) Common buckthorn sproutsCommon buckthorn was the dominant nonnative plant species at both Battle Creek and Eagle Lake sites, comprising 75% of all understory species before control treatments. Plots treated with prescribed fire had higher seedling densities of both common buckthorn and other plant species (including herbaceous weeds and native species) than those that were not burned. Native seedlings that emerged after burning included oak, white birch (Betula papyrifera), pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica), and black cherry [18].
Common buckthorn response to integrated management with prescribed fire is likely to vary among sites. Restoration efforts at Santa Fe Prairie, a prairie remnant in northeastern Illinois, included fire management and herbicide application to cut stems. In 2003, after 5 years of restoration efforts, common buckthorn frequency did not change on dry-mesic prairie sites. Common buckthorn occurred at 23.81% frequency in 1998 and 25.0% frequency in 2003. However, common buckthorn frequency decreased slightly on mesic prairie sites, from 12.5% frequency in 1998 to 5% frequency in 2003 [24].
Spot-burning: Common buckthorn seedlings, saplings, and sprouts may be controlled by spot-burning with a propane torch the first growing season after dormant-season removal of mature plants [214]. However, spot-burning immediately after cutting does not prevent sprouting [6]. A 5 to 10 second flame torch application around the common buckthorn stem kills the cambium of stems less than 1.8 inches (4.5 cm) in diameter [15]. Once adult common buckthorn have been removed from an area it is likely that large numbers of seedlings, a few saplings that were missed, and some sprouts from cut-stumps will establish or persist in the next growing season. Spot-burning individual plants or groups of plants (or a small area) has 2 advantages: 1) the torches can be used in areas where there is little or no fine fuel to carry prescribed fire, and 2) the torches can be used during wet or otherwise unsuitable weather for prescribed burning. Torching seedlings until wilting occurs is usually sufficient to kill them; it is not usually necessary to torch seedlings to ash (although this is more satisfying). Torching seedlings and saplings at the stem base rather than the entire plant may be most efficient. Usually one treatment removes most seedlings/saplings, but repeated treatments in the same or next growing season may be necessary due to seed bank input or sapling sprouts. Seedlings are not usually capable of sprouting if torched in the first growing season (before August) [214]. An experiment near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, compared follow-up treatment of stumps with herbicide to follow-up treatment with a propane torch immediately after cutting aboveground stems. Each of 120 randomly selected common buckthorn shrubs or trees was cut off at the base and subsequently girdled with a propane torch for 2 to 3 minutes. The propane torch applied a temperature of approximately 1,800 °F (1,000 °C) to the cambium layer. Sprouts emerged from fire-treated stumps in the spring and developed "vigorously". The new leaves were larger than those on untreated shrubs, and the crown was also denser than on untreated individuals of similar size. Some of the chemicals tested were more effective than burning [6]. See Chemical control for more details on this method. Detailed operational guidelines for use of propane torches are provided in the Weed Control Methods Handbook, Appendix 2.3 [214].
Altered fuel characteristics: A lack of groundlayer herbaceous species under dense common buckthorn patches and the rapid decomposition of common buckthorn leaf litter due, in part, to its association with nonnative earthworms, often results in bare ground under invasive patches of common buckthorn (see Fuels and Influence on succession and plant community dynamics). In oak-dominated ecosystems that were once maintained by frequent fires, surface fuels consisted largely of oak leaves. In invaded oak stands, common buckthorn leaf litter decomposes much more rapidly than oak leaf litter and increases the decomposition rate of mixed-species litter when it is a litter component [94], especially in the presence of nonnative earthworms [92,97,137]. These changes in surface fuel characteristics brought about by common buckthorn invasion make invaded communities very difficult to burn. Managers at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum report that fire does not carry well in areas where common buckthorn has invaded, largely because of the lack of surface fuels and the generally cooler, moister microclimate under the dense shade of common buckthorn thickets (personal communications [67,85,99]). Differences in phenology between common buckthorn and native species could theoretically affect fire seasonality, rendering a community more or less flammable during particular seasons. For example, common buckthorn leafs out earlier than native vegetation and retains its leaves later into autumn. This topic deserves further study [47].
Information on FIRE REGIMES in plant communities where common buckthorn is native was not found in the available literature as of 2010. Based on its regeneration strategies and observations and studies of invasive populations in North America, common buckthorn is well adapted to survive fire (see Plant response to fire and Use of prescribed fire as a control agent) and persists even when subjected to a regime of frequent, low-severity fires (e.g., [22]).
Much of the following information on FIRE REGIMES in oak savannas was compiled from literature reviews in several papers: [4,22,23,24,83,113,125,131].
Common buckthorn seems to be most invasive and/or best studied in oak savannas. Before European settlement, oaks grew in a continuum of fire-adapted communities in central North America [41], and tree densities varied from open prairie with less than 2.5 trees/ha to oak forests with more than 250 trees/ha. Savannas were intermediate along this continuum, and savanna boundaries were dynamically driven by long and short-term climate fluctuations and the frequency and intensity of fires [113]. FIRE REGIMES and postfire successional patterns in oak savannas are complex and difficult to characterize due to variations in stand structures and plant community compositions, which are driven by a number of factors including substrate, geography, climate, and site disturbance history. However, historical accounts and fire scars on old oaks indicate that these communities were maintained by a regime of frequent, low-severity fires in presettlement times. Some presettlement fires in these communities were lightning-caused, but many were probably human-caused [4,22,23,24,83,113,125,131]. Low-severity fire may have occurred nearly every year in dry savannas, but age distribution of trees in distinct cohorts suggests that periodic severe fires were interspersed with several years of low-severity or no fire, allowing recruitment of canopy cohorts [4]. Because young oaks are susceptible to fire, absence of fire for 10 to 20 years may be required for recruitment; mesic species that are more susceptible to fire would not persist in this fire regime [83]. The best example of relict, Midwestern tallgrass savanna found by Haney and Apfelbaum [83] was in a Chicago suburb along a railroad where frequent fire apparently maintained the savanna.
With postsettlement fire exclusion, some savanna types became oak forests, sometimes with dense understories, as oak sprouts grew into trees (e.g., [23,59,113]), and native and nonnative woody species including common buckthorn established, spread, and interfered with native understory plants [4,5,83,113,125,131]. Spread and dominance of mesic trees and shrubs eventually reduces or prevents recruitment of oaks, even from root sprouts [83]. Common buckthorn was introduced to this landscape as a horticultural plant around the same time that fire exclusion began, and its seed was dispersed into these communities by birds that ate common buckthorn fruit and deposited its seed under perch trees and shrubs into a niche that was not suitable for native savanna species that were adapted to the freqent-fire regime [131]. Common buckthorn has established, persisted, and often spread to become a dominant understory shrub in savanna communities where fire has been excluded in the Great Lakes area (e.g., [23,83,113,131]). See Successional Status for more information on common buckthorn's successional role in oak savannas and forests.
When fire is returned to these communities with management programs that include frequent prescribed fire, the abundance of nonnative and native mesic species is typically reduced, and native prairie and savanna associates are favored (e.g., [4,164]). However, additional control measures such as cutting of nonnative shrubs and/or planting of desirable native species is needed to best approximate desired species compositions and stand structures (see Use of prescribed fire as a control agent). Packard [164] declares that tallgrass savanna is a "classic example of a community whose continued existence depends almost entirely on a program of active restoration." Nonnative species such as common buckthorn and garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) may continue to persist and have the potential to spread without ongoing management (e.g., [22]).
Common buckthorn is sometimes invasive in prairie communities where fire has been excluded (e.g., [15,24,74]). Frequent fires in presettlement times maintained prairie communities by reducing or excluding woody species and favoring native graminoids and forbs, and fire exclusion has allowed native and nonnative woody species to establish and spread in some areas (e.g., [4,5,83,113,125,131]). Prairies managed with frequent prescribed fire are less likely to have established common buckthorn individuals or populations [24,36,74].
See the Fire Regime Table for additional information on FIRE REGIMES of vegetation communities in which common buckthorn may occur. Find further fire regime information for the plant communities in which these species may occur by entering the species' names in the FEIS home page under "Find FIRE REGIMES".
No information was available regarding FIRE REGIMES in plant communities invaded by Dahurian buckthorn. Only one description of an invasive population of Dahurian buckthorn was found in the literature available as of 2010, where it occurred in a red maple swamp [173]. Historical FIRE REGIMES have not been described for this plant community, but are likely characterized by mixed-severity fires with very long return intervals.
As of this writing (2010), none of the available literature specifically addressed fuel characteristics of common buckthorn or Dahurian buckthorn. However, observations and descriptions from study sites where common buckthorn forms invasive populations indicate changes in understory plant and litter composition and abundance (e.g., [3,6,20,31,67,74,85,94,96,97,99,131,164]), suggesting that surface fuel characteristics are altered in invaded stands. Shrub layer fuels may be altered by common buckthorn patches because common buckthorn can be difficult to burn (e.g., [121,164]). However, one study suggests that the shrub layer may become more flammable because of the abundance of dead stems in common buckthorn stands [140].
The understory of dense thickets of common buckthorn in oak-dominated ecosystems tends to have very little surface fuel. The lack of surface fuel impedes fire spread, making it difficult to use prescribed fire to manage these stands [164] (personal communications [67,85,99]). Initial attempts to use prescribed fire to enlarge prairie openings and reduce thickets of common buckthorn-dominated brush surrounding areas of former bur oak savanna in the Chicago area failed, because brush patches did not burn: "Ten-foot grass flames would sear the outer edges, but in the thicket where there was no grass, just green wood and matted leaves, the blaze quickly dwindled and flickered out." Most of the brush that did burn quickly grew back. In spring of 1984, experimental fires under the bur oak, where common buckthorn and Tatarian honeysuckle made up much of the dense understory, were characterized by 4- to 5-inch (10-13 cm) flames with occasional flare-ups in patches of dense fuel. Most of the common buckthorn and honeysuckle were top-killed and, aside from small sprouts, the understory was open: having bare soil and no shrubs. The author notes that compared to prairie, burning in degraded savanna communities with relatively little fuel may require drier, hotter, or windier weather [164].
Several authors have observed that fewer herbs grow beneath common buckthorn patches than beneath native shrubs [3,20,31,74,97,131,164]. Very little litter accumulates beneath common buckthorn patches [6,94,97,119] due to the high nitrogen content and ready decomposition of common buckthorn leaves [92,97], which is facilitated by a synergistic relationship between common buckthorn and nonnative earthworms [92,97,137]. See Influence on succession and plant community dynamics for more information on these topics. Heneghan and others [96] found that the litter layer in more open, buckthorn-free areas had 2 to 6 times greater biomass (depending on the season) than the litter under common buckthorn thickets. The understory of common buckthorn patches seems to be dominated by either common buckthorn seedlings [6,74,144,175,243] and/or bare soil [4,92,164].
Common buckthorn litter decomposes rapidly, and decomposition of mixed-leaf litter is accelerated when common buckthorn leaves are a component. Most common buckthorn litter disappears before it is replenished in fall [74,94] (Steffen and Heneghan personal observation cited by [97]). Under extensive common buckthorn thickets in woodlands around Chicago, the litter layer is typically gone and the mineral soil exposed within the first few weeks of spring [97]. Observations indicated that the forest floor in dense common buckthorn patches has only scattered oak litter. Earthworms showed a strong preference for common buckthorn litter in a decomposition experiment, and >90% of common buckthorn in litter bags allowing earthworm access was consumed in 3 months in areas with high earthworm abundance and biomass (e.g., under common buckthorn patches). Even in the absence of earthworms common buckthorn litter is readily broken down by microbial decomposers because of its unusually high nitrogen content [92]. Common buckthorn litter decomposed more rapidly than sugar maple, white oak, or northern red oak litter, with or without earthworms present [92,97]. Additionally, the presence of common buckthorn litter accelerated the disappearance of litter of other species when leaf litter from multiple species was mixed [94].
Common buckthorn invasion may alter fuel characteristics in the shrub layer. Mascaro and Schnitzer [140] found nearly 7 times the abundance of dead stems in common buckthorn-dominated sites compared to native-dominated sites (P<0.05) (see details of Mascaro and Schnitzer's study for descriptions of study sites). The authors suggest that common buckthorn stems are highly combustible and that the high abundance of dead stems may make common buckthorn-dominated sites more prone to fire. They suggest this may promote crown-fire development on some sites. Most of the sites described in their study were small, fragmented stands in close proximity to roads where the risk of human-caused fires may be especially high [140]. Managers at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, however, have not observed common buckthorn acting as a ladder fuel (personal communication [85]), and instead find that prescribed fire is impeded in common buckthorn patches (personal communications [67,99]). Similar observations were made in invaded prairie and savanna sites in Illinois [121,164].
Some fresh common buckthorn seed is germinable and does not require scarification or stratification for germination [2,69,175,215]; however, seeds must be extracted from fruits for germination to occur [6,74], and scarification may increase germination rate [74,175]. Germination rates are higher for seeds that have overwintered in the field than for fresh seeds [6,175,204]. Common buckthorn seedling emergence is inhibited by a litter or herbaceous layer [18,65,118] and is increased by soil disturbance [18,65,74].
Common buckthorn seedlings do not emerge from intact fruits. Seeds dispersed in fruits may not germinate until the following spring, probably after the fruit has decayed or been consumed by animals [6]; this allows the entire growing season for seedling establishment. Seeds that overwintered in the field did not germinate with the pulp left on. With pulp removal, germination percentages ranged from 76% to 92%. Mean time to germination was about 42 days, and germination peaked at 34 to 40 days [6,74]. Dupont and others (1997 cited by [175]) suggested that the role of frugivores was more to remove the pulp of the fruit than to break dormancy or scarify seed during passage through the digestive system.
Effects of passage of common buckthorn seeds through an animal's digestive system are unclear, though it may hasten germination. Acid scarification of common buckthorn seeds has shown variable effects on germination (e.g., [65,74,116]). Leaching seeds in running water for 2 hours, exposure to concentrated sulfuric acid for 1 minute, or rubbing seeds between 2 layers of fine sandpaper increased both the rapidity and percentage of common buckthorn germination (Govinthasamy and Cavers unpublished data cited by [175]).
Some fully mature common buckthorn seeds lack dormancy [215], and several authors [2,69,175,215] report some germination of fresh seeds. Cold stratification may not be required for germination; however, total percent germination and germination rate were higher for seeds that were either exposed to cold temperatures in the laboratory [175,215] or that overwintered under field conditions [6,175,204] than for fresh or unstratified seeds. This may be why some authors recommend prechilling or state that common buckthorn requires cold stratification [13,175]. Fresh, undried seeds of common buckthorn germinated without stratification when exposed to alternating temperature regimes [215].
Percent germination and germination rate of fresh common buckthorn seed exposed to different alternating temperature regimes [215] Temperature regime (°C) 3/25 20/30 3/15 3/20 Maximum germination 22-45% 86-95% 0 0 Time to reach 50% of maximum 6 to 11 weeks 2.5 to 3.5 weeks -- --Germination of common buckthorn and native Carolina buckthorn were compared in a greenhouse study. Germination percentage for common buckthorn was 48% after 0 days of cold stratification, was greatest (85%) after 42 days of cold stratification, and declined slightly after 112 days of stratification. Mean daily germination of common buckthorn consistently exceeded that of Carolina buckthorn [204].
Common buckthorn has higher seedling emergence rates in bare soil than in the presence of herbaceous plants [65,74] or leaf litter [18,74]. Removal of surface litter with prescribed spring fires increased common buckthorn seedling density [18]. Soil disturbance and/or leaf litter removal may produce a flush of common buckthorn germination by stirring up dormant, buried seed and exposing it to light. Ela (1981 unpublished report cited by [74]) found that large numbers of common buckthorn seedlings established in areas where the soil was disturbed in the process of clearing Bell's honeysuckle from a site. In field tests, more common buckthorn seed germinated on bare soil than on soil with a dense litter layer (allowing no light to reach the soil surface) or herbaceous layer (allowing approximately 10% of the ambient light to reach the soil surface), although variation was high and differences were not significant. More common buckthorn seedlings established than the total number of seeds that were planted, probably because common buckthorn seeds already in the soil germinated after removal of the leaf litter [74]. Average cumulative emergence from early May to late June for common buckthorn was 28%, 7%, and 23% in plots with bare soil, 1-year-old herbs, or 15-year-old herbs, respectively. This suggests that early-successional herbs may have inhibited common buckthorn emergence [65]. Bisikwa [18] reported that increased depths of surface litter decreased seedling emergence and establishment of common buckthorn in both field and greenhouse experiments in Minnesota (see Seedling establishment for more details).
Exposure to light may enhance germination of common buckthorn seed in disturbed soil; however, a review by Qaderi and others [175] suggests there is no light requirement for common buckthorn seed germination. Greenhouse experiments comparing 4 light intensities found the lowest germination percentages occurred in the highest light intensity (100%), greatest germination at the 50% level (P<0.001), and germination at 25% and 12.5% full daylight was intermediate [74]. In another study, common buckthorn seeds took 23 to 59 days to germinate in light or dark, with 44% germination in light and 24% germination in dark [153].
Prolonged flooding may be detrimental to common buckthorn germination. A slight decline in germination was noted in seeds following immersion for 2 weeks. The mean germination rate for these seeds was 77%, with a mean time to emergence of 44 days. No germination occurred in seeds that were immersed for 2 months [6]. The highest germination rates occurred in moist but not saturated soil [74].
Common buckthorn's distribution extends northward through the greater part of Europe to 60° 48' in Norway and 61° 41' in Sweden and is present sparingly at high altitudes in northern Africa. It is typically a lowland species and is an "index plant" for elevation zones up to 1,100 feet (335 m) in Great Britain; up to 5,300 feet (1,600 m) in Switzerland; and up to 5,900 feet (1,800 m) in Morocco [71].
In North America, distribution of common buckthorn seems to correspond with high human population density [74], and common buckthorn frequently occurs in human-modified environments including pastures [55,74,194,209,225] and field edges [12], along fence rows [55,74,209,225], roadsides [12,74,138,194,209,225], railroads [12,225], in vacant lots [225], hedgerows [35,194], clearings [225], "waste places" [138], woodlots and disturbed woods [35,74], cultivated areas, and around dwellings [74].
Common buckthorn is a wide ranging species, its environmental tolerances are great in terms of temperature, moisture, and substrate, and it is found in a "vast array" of plant communities [74]. In wildlands it is most common in disturbed areas [154,155], though it can establish in relatively undisturbed sites [50]. It is most commonly observed along rivers, streams [12,49,74,123,225], and ravines [209], in open woods [55,74,138,225], woodland edges [138,209,225], rocky woods [194], shrublands, hillsides, damp places, and nearly any habitat except where there is extreme shading or dryness [74]. It seems to have an affinity for disturbed, fertile, calcium-rich, open, moist areas [74], but it can tolerate both dry and partially flooded conditions [203].
Within these broad designations, common buckthorn is found most often on fertile, sunny, moist, and disturbed sites [74]. In a study of 25 fragments of riparian forest in an urban-rural gradient along the Assiniboine River in southern Manitoba, common buckthorn was most prevalent in urban and suburban sites with a high proportion of edge habitat, and it was rarely found in rural sites or reference (relatively undisturbed) forests [155]. Common buckthorn was significantly more likely to occur in urban and suburban sites (P<0.005) and was characterized as an opportunistic species and an indicator of disturbed forest; it was positively associated with disturbance measures (such as cover of garbage) and negatively associated with native and overall plant diversity [154]. Common buckthorn was found in both intact (forest, open woods, streams, wetlands) and disturbed (fields, pastures, roadsides, ditches, train tracks, urban sites) sites in forest fragment patches within and around Ottawa. It was not strongly associated with forested, agricultural, or urban landscapes [50]. Observations by Delanoy and Archibold [45] in the Saskatoon area indicate that common buckthorn density decreases with distance from the city and the South Saskatchewan River, and that it is mostly restricted to coulees and similar valley side features where colluvial deposits provide moist, yet well-drained conditions. Some of the densest common buckthorn stands in the area occur on river terraces within the city limits [45].
Wildland areas in urban settings commonly serve as fronts from which invasives can spread into other, more natural environments surrounding cities, and are therefore important places to monitor invasive species [226]. Along the Wisconsin River, increased edge habitat, higher road densities, and altered flood regimes seemed to facilitate shrub invasions, whereas unfragmented forest and intact flood regime limited invasion. Frequency and density of shrubs ≥1.6 feet (0.5 m) tall were measured in 100-year floodplain forests along 9 reaches of the Wisconsin River. Both common and glossy buckthorn were present, though common buckthorn was more frequently observed. Common and glossy buckthorn, which were not identified separately in the study results, occurred in 13% of plots and averaged 0.48 stem/m². They were more frequent and more abundant in reaches in south-central Wisconsin (an area with greater anthropogenic disturbance) than in reaches in north-central or southwestern Wisconsin (P<0.0001), and more frequent (P=0.0134) and abundant (P=0.0311) near roads [174].
Dahurian buckthorn general site characteristics: In its native range in China, Dahurian buckthorn occurs below 5,900 feet (1,800 m) in forests on slopes, forest margins, thickets, and wet places along canals [242]. According to Stephens [202], Dahurian buckthorn seldom escapes cultivation in North America except in the northern part of its nonnative range in North Dakota and, as of 1973, one location in South Dakota. It is rarely found in waste places and along roadsides in Rhode Island and Connecticut [138]. Dahurian buckthorn appears to grow well in any type of soil, especially when moist [202]; however, it may also grow well on dry soils (USDA FS 1948 as cited by [74]).
Very little additional information regarding site preferences for Dahurian buckthorn was found in the available literature as of 2010. Most of the following information applies to common buckthorn unless otherwise indicated.
Climate: Common buckthorn and Dahurian buckthorn are both described as very hardy and durable shrubs or trees. They can be grown under cultivation from USDA hardiness zone 3 (average minimum temperatures ranging from -40 to -30 °F (-40 to -34 °C)) to zone 6 (average minimum temperatures ranging from -10 to 0 °F (-23 to -18 °C)) or 7 (average minimum temperatures ranging from 0 to 10 °F (-18 to -12 °C)) [48].
In North America common buckthorn occurs in a wide range of climatic conditions [74], growing in nearly any climate except those in arid regions [202]. The climate within its primary, worldwide range of distribution is humid continental, where humid conditions occur throughout the year, summers are cool, temperatures average over 50 °F (10 °C) during at least 4 months, and the mean temperature of the warmest month is under 72 °F (22 °C). Common buckthorn seldom occurs in areas where the average January temperature falls below 0 °F (-18 °C); and most of common buckthorn's range lies within the 60 °F to 75 °F (20-24 °C) (July) isotherms [74]. However, a review by Qaderi and others [175] notes that common buckthorn populations in Canada tolerate temperature extremes from 104 °F (40 °C) (the highest temperature in Toronto) to - 53 °F (-47 °C) (the lowest temperature in Saskatoon). Stem samples of common buckthorn collected in midwinter and exposed to temperatures as low as -11 °F (-24 °C) showed 100% survival [205].
Common buckthorn tolerates a wide range of moisture conditions. Average annual precipitation in much of common buckthorn's range is between 20 and 40 inches (508-1,020 mm). The eastern portion of its native range and the western portion of its nonnative range, which includes North Dakota, Montana, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, are drier (10-20 inches (250-510 mm) annual precipitation); and some parts within its US range are wetter, receiving 40 to 60 inches (1,020-1,500 mm) of annual rainfall [74].
In an effort to determine potential geographic extent of common buckthorn's spread in North America, Gourley [74] compared the distribution of common buckthorn outside cultivation in North America to climate, soil, and geological information in those areas. To the north, common buckthorn's range appeared to be limited by duration of temperatures too cold for flowering and seed set, possible winter-kill temperatures, and acidic soils. To the west, common buckthorn's range extends to the semiarid Great Plains and Rocky Mountains. The precise limits of common buckthorn's distribution probably involve a complex of factors [74].
In the early 1900s common buckthorn and Dahurian buckthorn were planted as potential shelterbelt species in Mandan, North Dakota, in the northern Great Plains. The test site was semiarid, with temperature extremes ranging from -63 °F to 121 °F (-53 to 49 °C), frost-free periods ranging from 89 to 161 days, and mean annual precipitation ranging from 9.39 to 24.20 inches (238.5-614.7 mm). Of 100 common buckthorn individuals planted in 1918, 100% survived 10 years and 98% survived 32 years. Common buckthorn was described as extremely cold and drought hardy, with only minor winter injury. Of 39 Dahurian buckthorn individuals planted on the site in 1929, 100% survived 1 year, and 33% survived 5 to 32 years. Dahurian buckthorn was described as cold and drought hardy, with only minor winter injury, although its stems and branches were easily broken by drifted snow [63]. Another study in the northern Great Plains reports 67.9% survival of 15 planted Dahurian buckthorn individuals after 5 years [62].
Elevation, topography, and soil depth: Few sources provide information on the elevational range of common buckthorn, and no information was available for Dahurian buckthorn (as of 2010). Common buckthorn may be an abundant shrub in disturbed settings within the eastern white pine-oak forest alliance of the northeastern United States, which occurs at elevations below 3,000 feet (915 m). In the northern glaciated portion of the range, the forest occurs on outwash plains or moraines, as well as along mid- and lower slopes and within protected ravines, and on protected ridges or upper slopes of shale, sandstone or other sedimentary rock, occasionally underlain by metamorphic or igneous rock. Along the unglaciated plateau, this community occurs on rolling topography underlain by sandstone [166]. The majority of common buckthorn at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum occurs in low-lying areas at 850 to 870 feet (260-265 m) near Lake Wingra [74]. One record reported a common buckthorn plant at 5,100 feet (1,550 m) in north-central Colorado, but it may have been cultivated [87]. In China, common buckthorn occurs in valleys and on slopes between 3,940 and 4,600 feet (1,200-1,400 m) [242]. In northern Africa it is restricted to high altitudes [71].
At the University of Wisconsin Arboretum common buckthorn is most abundant in nearly level areas and at the bases of areas with steep topography. It occurs to a limited extent in areas with 2% to 5% slope and some areas with as much as 12% slope [74]. The abundance of common buckthorn was examined at 3 locations on 3 site types (upland forests, river bluffs and ravine slopes, and floodplains) in the Thames River watershed in London, Ontario. Common buckthorn was found on all site types in each location, but was generally least abundant on upland sites [226]. In Europe common buckthorn shows a general preference for south and west slopes [71].
In the limestone woodlands at Chaumont Barrens Preserve in north-central New York, adult common buckthorn were found only on sites where soil depth exceeded 2.8 inches (7 cm), though seedlings and saplings were found at a wide range of soil depths. This suggests that common buckthorn seedlings can establish at a wide range of soil depths but cannot survive to adulthood at a soil depth less than 2.8 inches. In the calcareous pavement barrens, seedlings, saplings, and adults are found at all soil depths; one explanation for this is that the limestone bedrock contains many cracks that allow the roots of trees and shrubs to grow in seemingly little soil [188].
Soil nutrients, mineralogy, and parent material: While information on specific soil nutrient and pH preferences of common buckthorn in North America is sparse [120], several authors indicate that common buckthorn has an affinity for alkaline and calcareous soils or soils derived from limestone in both Europe and North America (e.g., [69,74,106,120,175], and there are several examples of its occurrence in such areas (e.g., [31,74,198]). Common buckthorn may have an affinity, though not a requirement, for alkaline and calcium-rich soils, and its distribution may be limited by acidic soils, deep shade, or aridity (see below) [74,131]. However, the fact that buckthorn tolerates association with conifers demonstrates some adaptability in soil requirements [74]. For example, common buckthorn is sometimes abundant in the shrub layer in disturbed settings within the eastern white pine-oak forest alliance of the northeastern United States, which occurs on acidic, nutrient-poor soils [166].
Soils under common buckthorn may have higher percentages of nitrogen and carbon, modified nitrogen mineralization rates, and modified microbial communities compared to soils without common buckthorn. See Influence on succession and plant community dynamics for more information on this topic.
Soil moisture and texture : A comprehensive review by Kurylo and others [120] indicates that soil-moisture preferences reported for common buckthorn range from dry to moist in both European and North American habitats. Some authors indicate that common buckthorn prefers moist soils in England [71], eastern Ontario [160], around Saskatoon, Saskatchewan [6], the northern Great Plains [202], west-central Minnesota [243], and the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [74,75]. Common buckthorn commonly occurs in wetland communities in the Great Lakes region (e.g., [40,52,74,133]), and it is often noted in riparian areas that experience regular spring flooding (e.g., [52,74,105,160]). Some studies have found that common buckthorn grows best on sites with high moisture availability (e.g., [74,140]). However, along the Wisconsin River, buckthorns (common and glossy combined) were more likely to occur on relatively high elevations (P=0.0446) and at distances farther from the river (P=0.0018), where flooding is less frequent [174]. Within Clark Reservation State Park in New York, common buckthorn occurs in an area with soils described as thin and drought-prone [196], and a study of common buckthorn in 28 upland, oak-dominated woodlots in southeastern Wisconsin found that common buckthorn density and importance values were highest in the more xeric bur oak communities and decreased in the more mesic sugar maple communities [131]. Site and microsite preferences may be affected by a combination of light availability, disturbance, and moisture availability (see Shade tolerance). Common buckthorn seedling densities had positive correlations with cation exchange capacity and percent clay and a negative correlation with percent organic matter and continuum index (i.e., shade) (P≤0.002). The author suggests that the bur oak savanna presents the ideal set of conditions for common buckthorn invasion and growth: relatively high light intensity and fertile, deep, humic soils [131].
In the northeastern United States, common buckthorn is classified as an upland species, suggesting that it rarely occurs in wetlands in that region. In the northern and central Great Plains, common buckthorn is classified as a facultative upland species: one that usually occurs in nonwetlands but is occasionally found in wetlands [178]. The 1996 draft revisions for wetland indicator statuses list common buckthorn as "facultative negative" in part of the Northeast Region (the Great Lakes Plain subregion of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York) and the whole of the North Central Region (covering Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin), meaning that it is found in wetlands, but not as frequently as a facultative species [120]. Kurylo and others [120] raise some questions regarding common buckthorn based on these designations, particularly questioning whether common buckthorn populations in the northern and central Great Plains may be somehow ecologically distinct (e.g., an ecotype) from populations elsewhere within its invaded range, and whether these differences are attributable to a difference in native seed sources. For example, common buckthorn in England forms nearly monospecific stands in some fens, whereas it occurs in drier habitats in continental Europe [120].
A detailed survey at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum indicates that common buckthorn is most common and grows best on sites that are either open or moist or both [74,75] (see Shade tolerance). The greatest density of common buckthorn and the largest common buckthorn trees occurred in open-canopy wetlands in nearly level areas of deep, poorly to very poorly drained soils where the seasonal high water table is at or near the surface (<1 foot (0.3 m) deep). Common buckthorn also does well in wet and relatively shady areas. In one area with soils described as "extremely wet and mucky" and supporting the largest common buckthorn individuals found in the Arboretum (some measuring 37 inches (95 cm) in circumference), many of the large common buckthorn individuals have fallen over, suggesting that the trees may have grown too top-heavy for their shallow root system in this substrate [74]. Kurylo and others [120] cite evidence suggesting that common buckthorn may be limited by a high winter water table or more waterlogged parts of wetlands, preferring relatively drier microsites in some wetland areas. Drier soils in the Arboretum support common buckthorn growth, but to a more limited extent than wet areas. Prairie sites, which do not have common buckthorn, are drier upland areas with gently rolling or slightly irregular topography [74].
While common buckthorn often occurs on relatively wet sites, some evidence suggests that seedling establishment, growth, and frost resistance may be negatively impacted by prolonged flooding. At Chaumont Barrens Preserve in north-central New York, Samuels [188] suggested that the lack of common buckthorn seedlings, saplings, and adults in alvar grasslands may have been due to inhibition of common buckthorn seed germination by seasonal flooding. Common buckthorn occurs in both floodplain and basin forested wetlands dominated by silver maple in southeastern Wisconsin. The water table is at or near the soil surface most of the year in both site types, although basin soils always have 14 to 16 inches (35-40 cm) of standing water in spring, while floodplain soils are flooded every 2 to 3 years, usually in spring. Common buckthorn importance value (relative basal area+relative frequency+relative density) in the shrub layer was similar on floodplain sites (3.5) and basin sites (2.4). In the seedling layers, however, importance value was significantly greater on floodplain sites (17.9) than on basin sites (5.4) (P<0.05). Common buckthorn did not occur in the tree layer in either site type. Basin soils had significantly lower pH (6.5 versus 7.2), higher organic matter and higher calcium and magnesium content (P<0.0001) [52]. Common buckthorn individuals grown in a garden grew taller in well-drained (control) trenches than in trenches continuously flooded to a depth of 4 inches (10 cm) above the soil surface for 120 days [60]:
Common buckthorn height growth and diameter growth after 120 days under well-drained (control) or flooded conditions (n=20) [60] Parameter Initial height (cm) Height growthWhen young trees were assessed the following year, common buckthorn individuals from the flooded treatment had significantly less height and diameter growth compared to controls (P=0.001). Fewer common buckthorn individuals survived in the second year after flooding (~78%), although differences were not significant. Previously flooded common buckthorn individuals also seemed more susceptible to frost injury during the period of recovery [60]. In a greenhouse study, common buckthorn initially showed reduced photosynthetic rates upon exposure to partial flooding; although photosynthetic rate recovered, plants remained significantly smaller than controls [203].
Common buckthorn often occurs on soils with relatively high percentages of organic matter (e.g., [184]), but its distribution does not seem to be correlated with particular soil textural classes (e.g., [226]). In Canada, common buckthorn frequently occurs on clays or loams [175]. Field observations of 24 oak woods in northwestern Indiana, northeastern Illinois, and southern Wisconsin found common buckthorn occurred on deep silty clay loams that are not frequently subject to extreme drying [83]. Common buckthorn may be an abundant shrub in disturbed settings within the eastern white pine-oak forest alliance of the northeastern United States, which occurs on dry-mesic to mesic, sandy loam to sandy soils [166]. Buckthorns (common and glossy combined) were most frequent in sandy soils (P<0.0001) along the Wisconsin River [174].
Soil disturbance: Areas of the heaviest concentrations of common buckthorn in the University of Wisconsin Arboretum are consistently places of soil disturbance such as trail and wood edges, dredge spoil sites, clearings, areas where Bell's honeysuckle was removed, streambanks, areas of steep topography with high erosion potential, excavated areas, an area directly under and around utility lines and poles, and deer yards [74]. Where common buckthorn occurs on dry sites in the Arboretum, Gourley [74] speculated that soil disturbance may have allowed it to establish. Prairie sites without common buckthorn were less disturbed than those with common buckthorn. Lack of perches to facilitate bird dispersal of seeds and interference from prairie grasses may also contribute to the rarity of common buckthorn in prairies [74].
Common buckthorn and Dahurian buckthorn were planted at 6 surface coal mine reclamation sites in Wyoming and Colorado. Both species survived and grew at 4 of the 6 sites during the first year after planting [102]. Site data from 2 of those sites are given in the table below:
Site characteristics and growth and survival of common buckthorn and Dahurian buckthorn at 2 coal mine reclamation sites in Wyoming and Colorado. All sites were surface-mined. Shrubs were planted in spring of 1976 and measurements taken at the end of the 1977 growing season [102]. Site Gillette Glenrock Elevation (feet) 4,500 6,000 Mean annual precipitation (mm) 384.3 337.6 Soil pH Topsoil* 6.9 6.3 Subsoil 6.7 5.2 Soil texture Topsoil Clay loam Sandy loam Subsoil Clay loam Sandy loam Electrical conductivityData from 2 sites at Oak Creek are not included in the table because soil information is not clear. Common buckthorn had 100% survival and Dahurian buckthorn had 75% survival at both Oak Creek sites. Height and spread were about half as much for both species as at the other sites. Oak Creek sites were located at 7,500 feet (2,300 m) elevation, received 15.8 inches (401.7 mm) average annual precipitation, and soils were silt loams over clay loams, with a pH of 7.4 over 7.7, electrical conductivity of 2.00 mmhos/cm over 3.30 mmhos/cm, and organic matter of 6.5% to 3.7%. Neither common buckthorn nor Dahurian buckthorn survived at the Hanna or Kemmerer sites, which differed from other sites in terms of elevation (7,200-7,600 feet (2,200-2,300 m)), average annual precipitation (9.3-10.6 inches (235.2-270.5 mm)), and pH (7.3-8.0). Soils at the Hanna site also had the highest electrical conductivity (7.02 mmhos/cm), indicating a high salt content. Sites at Gillette and Glenrock were cultivated, while the other sites were planted and left to compete with the plants of natural succession [102]. Native vegetation at these sites is described in Habitat Types and Plant Communities: Western North America.
Immediate fire effect on plant: Common buckthorn is difficult to burn and may be little affected by fire (e.g., [4,83,164]), especially in areas where surface fuels are too sparse or moist to carry fire. If surface fuels are sufficient, common buckthorn shrubs and trees are top-killed by fire [20,69]. Frequent or high-severity fire may kill common buckthorn shrubs and trees, although no examples of common buckthorn mortality from frequent or severe fire alone were found in the available literature as of 2010. Common buckthorn seedlings have "poorly developed" roots and are killed by fire. At Pipestone National Monument in southwestern Minnesota, spring (mid-April to mid-May) prescribed burning top-killed common buckthorn shrubs and killed common buckthorn seedlings [20].
Common buckthorn seedling establishment after fire [18] indicates that its seeds in the soil seed bank survive and may be scarified by fire. Germination and seedling establishment may increase after fire, possibly due to scarification by fire (although this has not been documented), or because common buckthorn seedling emergence is inhibited by a litter or herbaceous layer [18,65,118] and is increased by soil disturbance [18,65,74]. Prescribed burning in open oak woodlands following common buckthorn removal (by cutting and herbicide application to stumps) reduced common buckthorn sapling survival and plant height but increased common buckthorn seedling density compared to treatments without follow-up burning. Increased light and temperature at the soil surface, due to both litter removal and suppression of sprouting, likely facilitated postfire seedling emergence [18].
Common buckthorn is not a preferred browse species for wildlife and livestock, partly because of its spine-tipped branches [175], but it may be heavily browsed in some plant communities (e.g., [236]). Obvious avoidance of common buckthorn by native wildlife was noted at Sutherland Beach in Saskatoon. Although common buckthorn stems greatly outnumbered native stems, they remained untouched while 32 chokecherry stems and 2 Saskatoon serviceberry stems had been girdled over the winter [45].
Mammals:
Food: Common buckthorn does not appear to be a major food source for mammalian herbivores [116], but it may be used in some plant communities. Common buckthorn was not used by white-tailed deer in a deer yard in southwestern Quebec from 1985 to 1986, when several other deciduous hardwood shrubs were available for browse [28]. Common buckthorn occurred in browsed, but not in fenced areas in Sharon Woods Metro Park, Ohio [8]. However, observations in Wisconsin suggest that white-tailed deer, and probably cattle, preferred common buckthorn over eastern redcedar [236] (see Old-field succession for details).
A review by Knight and others [116] notes cases where common buckthorn saplings were avoided by eastern cottontail and American beavers. On a 3-acre (1.2 ha) site in western Massachusetts, common buckthorn received only a trace amount of feeding injury from eastern cottontail during the winter of 1947 to 1948 [211]. Common buckthorn seedlings were damaged or killed by unknown herbivores in old fields in New York [65] and by spring browsing by rabbits in England; few common buckthorn individuals were damaged in summer and fall [79]. Mice and other rodents may consume common buckthorn seeds in some locations (see Seed predation).
Cover: Common buckthorn thickets in wetlands at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum appear to be favored places for white-tailed deer [74]. Apparently, buckthorn thickets are favored places for deer herding in Europe, too. It is thought that the name buckthorn may have arisen in Europe, where it provides shelter for the male deer or bucks (USDA Forest Service 1937 as cited by [74]).
Birds:
Food: Accounts of the palatability and consumption of common buckthorn fruits vary. Consumption likely depends on availability of other food sources. Some authors suggest that common buckthorn fruits are readily eaten [90] and quickly scattered [55] by birds, while others note that common buckthorn fruits persist on bushes and may be unpalatable [70]. Observations of dried fruits remaining on shrubs until late winter or spring when all more palatable fruits of other species have been consumed [71,175] suggest that common buckthorn fruit is used as a food of last resort [175]. The rate of common buckthorn fruit removal by birds is related to their preference for its fruit relative to that of cooccurring shrubs. For example, the order of preference in old fields in Tompkins County, New York, is Allegheny blackberry>gray dogwood>southern arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum)>>>common buckthorn>staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) [65] (see Seed dispersal).
Several species of birds consume common buckthorn fruits and disperse its seeds. Lindsey (1939 as cited by [32]) reported that common buckthorn formed 8.3% of the food of European starlings in New York in November. Cedar waxwings are potential dispersers around Saskatoon [6], while American robins and cedar waxwings appear to be the main dispersal agents of common buckthorn in the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [74]. Common buckthorn seeds occurred in feces of thrush in New Jersey; seed viability was not reported. Common buckthorn did not occur in stomach samples of any bird species [233], and no feeding was observed on common buckthorn in this study [234]. Knight [118] provides a list of birds observed feeding on or nesting in common buckthorn in Europe and North America.
Cover: Common buckthorn growth form includes many, more or less horizontal branches and twigs that are likely to be attractive to perching birds [119] or suitable for nest construction for many songbird species. In a wooded habitat at the Morton Arboretum in Lisle, Illinois, nests of several birds including wood thrushes, catbirds, American robins, northern cardinals, rose-breasted grosbeaks, blue jays, and red-eyed vireos occurred in either common buckthorn or nonnative honeysuckles. The authors speculated the nonnative shrubs were chosen for nest sites because the height and branch structure were suitable for nest building, and because there was a lack of native shrubs [231]. In eastern Canada, loggerhead shrike nests were located in common buckthorn, although infrequently (<10% of nests observed) [34]. Common buckthorn was one of the most common plant species used in nests of European starlings in a study in southern Germany [81]. The only 2 bird nests in the hundreds of common buckthorn trees observed in the University of Wisconsin Arboretum appeared to be those of the marsh wren [74]. Nests in common buckthorn may experience higher rates of predation than nests in native shrubs (e.g., [190], see Impacts). Although common buckthorn has dense growth to the ground level and does not provide "the best" cover for northern bobwhite, it is listed among plants "potentially useful" for improving northern bobwhite habitat in northwestern Oklahoma [86].
Insects: Many species of insects associate with common buckthorn in Europe, and several species of moths and psyllids seem to use it exclusively. In North America some generalist insects feed on common buckthorn [116], but common buckthorn seems to experience less herbivory than cooccurring native plants [93]. More insect herbivores were associated with common buckthorn in Europe than in Canada. Nearly all herbivorous insects associated with Rhamnaceae in Europe and Canada were either Lepidopterans or Hemipterans; Coleoptera found on Rhamnaceae were not usually species-specific. Plant feeders such as Say's stink bug and the eastern tent caterpillar were observed feeding on leaves of common buckthorn at 3 locations in London, Ontario, in 1995 [175]. Green stink bugs use common buckthorn for food and habitat. They lay eggs on the undersides of the leaves and spend a large part of their life cycle on common buckthorn plants. For more information on the life cycle and phenology of green stink bugs on common buckthorn and other hosts in Quebec, see Javahery [107]. Van Veldhuizen and others [221] provide a survey of insect fauna on common buckthorn in 7 sites in southeastern Minnesota. Many insects may be deterred by the emodin content in the roots, fruits, seeds, bark, and foliage of common buckthorn [175].
Earthworms: Large densities of the European nightcrawler (Lumbricus terrestris) may be related to the presence of common buckthorn. See Fuels and Influence on succession and plant community dynamics for more information on this topic.
Nutritional value: Very little information was found in the available literature regarding the nutritional value of common buckthorn. The chemical composition of common buckthorn fruits was described as follows [86]:
Chemical composition (%) of common buckthorn fruits in western Oklahoma [86] Ash Protein Fat Fiber Nitrogen-free extract Calcium Phosphorus 2.58 21.79 23.88 20.16 31.59 0.55 0.248The emodin content in the roots, fruits, seeds, bark, and foliage of common buckthorn has a laxative effect and may deter herbivores and frugivores [175].
Life span and age distribution: The typical life span of common buckthorn is not clear. The oldest common buckthorn individual in Mary Mix McDonald Woods near Chicago was 72 years [95]. The age of the oldest common buckthorn specimen around Saskatoon was 56 years [6]. At Pipestone National Monument in southwestern Minnesota, the oldest specimen was 33 years old, while most individuals in the understory of riparian woods and oak savanna were 10 to 20 years old [20]. At the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, common buckthorn occurred in even-aged stands in both open wetlands and an oak woodland understory. In the woodland, common buckthorn age ranged from 14 to 44 years and averaged 24.2 years compared to a range of 12 to 23 years and an average of 15.35 years in the wetlands (P<0.0001). Common buckthorn trees produced fruit at a younger age in wetlands than in the woods (see Seed production) [74]. Once common buckthorn is established, reproduction from seed results in a vigorous, young population [6].
No information was available regarding the life span or age distribution of Dahurian buckthorn (as of 2010).
Common buckthorn management efforts in Minnesota, which may be applicable throughout its distribution, indicate that treating a site to control common buckthorn using one or a combination of control methods is the first step in a long, continual process. Sites need to be visited on an annual basis, checked for missed trees, and searched for reestablished saplings and seedlings. The amount of time and effort needed for retreatments will decline over time, but common buckthorn is likely to reestablish if not monitored and controlled. Common buckthorn cannot be eliminated from all areas, and sites should be prioritized so that the highest quality habitats are treated first [157]. Low-density stands of common buckthorn are not only less expensive to treat, but treatments are likely to yield better results (i.e., better recruitment of natives with less effort and/or expense) [45]. Similarly, Samuels [188] emphasizes the importance of controlling satellite populations of common buckthorn, because each outlying reproductive adult becomes an "establishment front" with greater potential to increase the area of infestation than a thicket of reproductive adults. A commonly used control method for common buckthorn involves either basal-bark spraying with herbicide or cutting followed by herbicide treatment of the cut stump (see Chemical control). These methods kill existing common buckthorn trees and saplings but must be repeated due to sprouting and rapid seedling establishment. Planting of desirable species may prevent or reduce common buckthorn seedling establishment, and prescribed burning or spot burning can be used as a follow-up treatment to kill sprouts and seedlings [192,214]. At the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, common buckthorn continually invades remnants of oak forest and areas planted to sugar maple, and these areas require continual maintenance with clearing, herbicide treatment, and prescribed burning [133].
Initial efforts concentrated on removing female common buckthorn shrubs can reduce the number of seeds in the seed bank [6,45] and allow retention of nesting habitat in the absence of a native shrub stratum [231,239]. In many small, fragmented woodlands invaded by common buckthorn, native shrubs may be absent or nearly so. Consequently, removing all nonnative invasive shrubs at once could lead to local extirpation of the bird species using those shrubs. Male common buckthorn plants can be left standing for a number of years while female plants are removed and native shrubs planted. Once native shrubs are large enough to provide nesting habitat, male trees can be removed [231].
Control treatments for common buckthorn may be most effective if timed to correspond to periods of low carbohydrate reserves (see Underground phenology and Fire timing).
Any control efforts that disturb the soil are likely to result in common buckthorn seedling establishment from the soil seed bank (e.g., [237]), and follow-up treatments will be necessary to control seedlings (see Use of prescribed fire as a control agent). See Germination and Seedling establishment for more information. Effective long-term control of common buckthorn may need to focus on conspecific seedling emergence for at least 2 years following control of existing shrubs [165].
Prevention: It is commonly argued that the most cost-efficient and effective method of managing invasive species is to prevent their establishment and spread by maintaining "healthy" natural communities [136,197]. For example, maintaining the integrity of animal communities including native seed predators may be an important aspect of supporting the biological resistance of natural areas to invasion by nonnative plants such as common buckthorn [143]. Managing to maintain the integrity of the native community and mitigate the factors enhancing ecosystem invasibility is likely to be more effective than managing solely to control the invader [101].
Monitoring potentially vulnerable communities several times each year is important for preventing establishment and spread of invasive species [108]. For example, Archibold and others [6] recommend careful monitoring of areas with perch trees and adjoining fencelines to help reduce common buckthorn establishment and spread.
Weed prevention and control can be incorporated into many types of management plans, including those for logging and site preparation, grazing allotments, recreation management, research projects, road building and maintenance, and fire management [218]. See the Guide to noxious weed prevention practices [218] for specific guidelines in preventing the spread of weed seeds and propagules under different management conditions.
Fire: For information on the use of prescribed fire to control buckthorns, see Fire Management Considerations.
Cultural Information on cultural control of common buckthorn comes primarily from studies that include planting of native species following other control efforts. See Integrated management and Integrated management with prescribed fire for more information on these studies.
A review by Converse [36] suggests that "underplanting" disturbed woods with native woody species is potentially effective to prevent primary invasion or reinvasion of buckthorns.
Physical or mechanical Physical control of common buckthorn typically involves cutting or girdling saplings and adult plants or hand-pulling seedlings. Cutting does not kill common buckthorn, and sprouts must be clipped as they occur [90]. Stumps can also be treated with herbicide to prevent or minimize sprouting (see Chemical control). Small plants may be uprooted using a weed wrench [214,237]. In Vermont, flooding was used successfully to kill common buckthorn seeds and seedlings [214].
Cutting common buckthorn plants typically results in abundant and vigorous sprouting (e.g., [157]), so follow-up treatments are needed. Plants that were cut had 36% and 75% more sprouts in 2003 and 2004, respectively, compared to untreated controls. Fewer sprouts in 2003 were likely due to below-average precipitation that year [18]. In the United Kingdom, a hedge management regime involving annual cutting (in either September or February) had a substantial negative impact on fruit production and growth of common buckthorn. Cessation of annual cutting for 3 years increased common buckthorn relative abundance about 250% [142]. In a preliminary study at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, 73% of common buckthorn plants sprouted following a single cutting after fruiting in July. Only 53% sprouted if the first cut was followed by a second 4 hours later [75]. Double-cutting also reduces the vigor of sprouts over the single-cut method. Although the double-cut technique is more labor intensive, it may be useful in wetlands or other areas where herbicides are restricted [74]. Pergams and Norton [165] found that neither cutting nor girdling alone was optimal for controlling common buckthorn in northeastern Illinois. See Chemical control for more details of this study.
Girdling and repeated cutting of sprouts may be somewhat effective for controlling common buckthorn, although it is time- and labor-intensive [78,90]. Girdled large stems take time to die and the results may not be seen until a year later. Heidorn [90] provides guidelines to increase effectiveness of girdling.
Uprooting common buckthorn seedlings by hand, and uprooting plants up to about 2 inches (5 cm) in diameter using a weed wrench may be effective [157,214,237]. However, hand-pulling is labor- and time-intensive and not always effective. For example, on 1 work day in June 1996 it took 8 volunteers 2 hours to remove about 125,000 seedlings from a 538-foot² (50-m²) area. This area was soon revegetated with common buckthorn seedlings from the disturbed seed bank and missed seedlings [214]. Hand-pulling of small (<0.5-inch (1 cm) stem diameter) common buckthorn saplings or seedlings is effective as a follow-up to large tree removal in small areas (<5 acres (2 ha)), or when abundant laborers are available. Pulled stems can be left on site. Hand-pulling is an important tool in areas where prescribed fires are not allowed. Root wrenches can be used to pull up larger common buckthorn (up to about 2 inches (5 cm) DBH) in relatively small areas. However, common buckthorn root systems are large enough that pulling and uprooting plants can result in substantial soil disturbance [157], possibly increasing invasibility of the site.
Biological Biological control of invasive species has a long history that indicates many factors must be considered before using biological controls. Refer to these sources: [220,240] and the Weed control methods handbook [214] for background information and important considerations for developing and implementing biological control programs.
A literature review and results from field surveys in Europe provide information on potential biological control of buckthorns in North America and on the specialized herbivorous arthropods on common and glossy buckthorn. As of this writing (2010), no insects had been released for biological control of common buckthorn. The most promising insects for biological control of common buckthorn, as of 2008, were the leaf-margin curled gall phylloid (Trichochermes walkeri), the leaf-feeding geometrid (Philereme vetulata), and the seed-feeding gall midge (Wachtiella krumbholzi) [61].
Observations in Wisconsin suggest that livestock may be used to help control common buckthorn in some areas under some conditions [236]. Preliminary observations indicate that domestic sheep readily browse tall common buckthorn but strongly avoid short stems in the ground layer [45]. Managing the browsing intensity would likely be difficult, as would preventing damage to associated desirable native plants. The authors suggest that a properly timed, brief period of controlled animal use might control common buckthorn invasion in early stages, when it is less than 3 feet (1 m) tall. It may also control sprouting after cutting, but experiments and monitoring would be needed to determine proper timing and intensity. The authors conclude that hand-cutting and spot use of chemicals would be simpler, safer, and more cost-effective than using livestock [236].
Chemical Management guidelines recommend a combination of cutting and prescribed burning for controlling common buckthorn in fire-adapted communities (see Integrated management with prescribed fire), and in areas where burning is not feasible they recommend basal-bark chemical girdling or treating cut stems with herbicide to improve control [78,90]. Several studies demonstrate the efficacy of these approaches using various chemicals (see below), with triclopyr and glyphosate being the most common [157]. Control may be improved when treatment is timed to correspond with common buckthorn's translocation of carbohydrates to the roots (see Underground phenology), although no studies were found to document this. Treatments may need to be repeated numerous times to control sprouts, and follow-up treatments are needed to control seedlings [45,78,165]. Care should be taken to avoid herbicide contact with nontarget plants, which are important for recolonizing the site after buckthorn is removed [90].
Herbicides are effective in gaining initial control of a new invasion or a severe infestation, but they are rarely a complete or long-term solution to weed management [29]. See the Weed control methods handbook [214] for considerations on the use of herbicides in natural areas and detailed information on specific chemicals, and see Heidorn [90] for specific recommendations and cautions for using herbicides to control buckthorns in wildlands.
Glyphosate and triclopyr appear to result in the highest mortality rates and least sprouting of common buckthorn when used in chemical girdling or cut-stem applications. A benefit of this method is that it minimizes damage to associated vegetation [114]. For more details on studies using these herbicides, see the review by Qaderi and others [165] and the following publications by location: Minnesota [18,20,21,237], Wisconsin [114], Saskatchewan [6,45].
Management guidelines recommend a formulation of triclopyr applied to cut stems or as a basal-bark treatment on large common buckthorn stems and sprouts less than 6 inches (15 cm) diameter [90]. Management efforts in Minnesota parks indicate that this approach works well on common buckthorn trees from 1 to 15 inches (2.5-28 cm) DBH [157].
Strategic timing of herbicide application may improve herbicide translocation and efficacy, and one author suggests that herbicide be applied during the fall when carbohydrates are being translocated to the roots [18]. Archibold and others [6] indicate that triclopyr can be used well into the dormant season, and when used at this time it eliminates the unsightly "brown-out " phase and prepares the stand for a subsequent burn intended to kill seedlings. Others also suggest that fall is the best time to find and treat common buckthorn. It is easier to locate then, because it stays green longer than natives and the black fruit clusters are highly visible even after leaves have dropped [45,90]. Because natives are dormant at this time, they are less likely to be damaged by herbicide [90,189]. However, foliar treatment in June killed more common buckthorn sprouts than foliar treatment in September, although neither was 100% effective [21].
Monitoring and follow-up treatments of common buckthorn sprouts and seedlings are likely necessary for several years [18,165]. Common buckthorn seedlings may also establish following herbicide applications to control other nonnative species, as was observed following efforts to control swallow-wort (Cynanchum spp.) at 3 sites in central New York [128]. Plots in Minnesota where common buckthorn plants were cut and treated with triclopyr had no sprouts but had 40% more common buckthorn seedlings than cut-only plots [18]. Similarly, common buckthorn seedlings were more numerous in plots where large common buckthorn shrubs were killed by chemical spraying than in plots where the shrubs were left untouched (Moriarty personal communication cited by [116]). Following herbicide treatments in the densest common buckthorn stands in riparian communities near Saskatoon, the ground layer was still dominated by common buckthorn. The authors recommend either foliar spraying, mowing, prescribed fire (if fuels are sufficient), or spot burning with a propane torch to kill common buckthorn seedlings. They note that controlling common buckthorn in the ground layer may not result in recruitment of native plants. The stand had few native woody seedlings or saplings, and the only herbaceous plant found in the groundlayer of their sample plots was the native Sprengel's sedge (Carex sprenglii), which is typically one of the dominant plants in native shrub stands in the region. At this study site, it was sparsely distributed with no visible seed production [45]. These results highlight the need for integrating native planting or seeding with common buckthorn removal.
Integrated management: Because the native seed bank is often depleted in areas where common buckthorn has invaded, it is important to plant native species after common buckthorn removal to achieve desired results. Some authors have noted a lack of natural regeneration following overstory and/or nonnative shrub removal in common buckthorn-invaded stands (e.g., [45,66,164]). Therefore a management approach that includes seeding or planting of native species may produce better results. Dealanoy and Archibold [45] outline a 4-phase approach to restoring native plant communities where common buckthorn has invaded: 1) remove fruiting common buckthorn stems using 3 to 5 chemical girdling passes; 2) remove common buckthorn from the ground layer using burning, mechanical, chemical or browsing methods, or girdle fruiting stems with herbicide as they mature; 3) remove male stems using chemical girdling; and 4) restore native plants using seeding or planting of native species as needed. Fire and browsing may be required to ensure long-term restoration success, depending on native FIRE REGIMES [45]. See Integrated management with prescribed fire for more information on this topic.Invasive populations of common buckthorn may impact plant community composition and structure, leaf litter decomposition, nutrient cycling, and soil biota. See Influence on succession and plant community dynamics for more information on these topics. Knight and others [116] suggest that the magnitude and direction of effects of common buckthorn on native plants and animals in invaded ecosystems in North America are not well understood, and more research is needed in this area. Isolating and quantifying the effects of common buckthorn invasion is complicated by the impacts of other changes in invaded communities including anthropogenic disturbances, the presence of other nonnative invasive plants, Dutch elm disease, white-tailed deer overpopulation, nonnative earthworm invasion, altered flooding regimes, and climate change [3,82,97,116]. Although Dirr [48] has seen Dahurian buckthorn "literally consume waste areas", no information was available as of this writing (2010) on the impacts of Dahurian buckthorn on native communities.
Invasive populations of common buckthorn may impact native animals, especially birds. Although birds consume common buckthorn fruits and the shrubs provide nesting sites (see Birds), similar native shrubs likely provide better nesting sites. On a site in an urban reserve outside Chicago, American robin nests in common buckthorn experienced higher rates of predation than nests in hawthorns. Common buckthorn lacks the sharp thorns that characterize hawthorn, which may increase nest predation. Predation of wood thrush nests was lower in common buckthorn than in native viburnum, but predation was similar to that in hawthorns and native tree species such as maples, hophornbeam, and plums [190].
Common buckthorn is considered a poisonous plant in the United States and Canada [175], and Dahurian buckthorn is also said to be toxic if ingested [43]. Common buckthorn bark, leaves, and fruits are strongly purgative when consumed. Other effects include nausea, stomach cramps, gastroenteritis, diarrhea, and irritation of the gastrointestinal mucosa to the point of bleeding. Poisoning is rare but has been reported in Europe. Consumption of common buckthorn in sufficient quantity causes poisoning in cattle, reduces milk quantity and quality, and even affects the meat [175]. Following an outbreak of an idiopathic neurological disease in horses in Illinois, common buckthorn was identified as a possible cause, and a study was undertaken to assess its toxicity in mice. Researchers found that compounds in common buckthorn interfered with glycogen metabolism, causing abnormal changes in liver cells. The authors concluded that common buckthorn could not be ruled out as a cause of the neurologic disorder in the horses, and that further research was needed to determine whether liver injury in mice would progress [132]. No additional studies on this topic were found as of 2010.
Common buckthorn is an overwintering host for 2 invasive crop pests, oat crown rust (Puccinea coronata) and the soybean aphid (Aphis glycines). Oat crown rust infestations tend to be more severe in oat crops located near common buckthorn plants, and removal of common buckthorn in the vicinity of oat fields has long been recommended for reducing the severity of rust infection [175]. The nonnative soybean aphid first appeared in Wisconsin in 2000, and within 4 years, it spread to 21 states and 3 Canadian provinces, putting more than 60 million acres (24 million ha) of soybean at risk to crop injury. Common buckthorn occurs over much of this area. In China and Japan, the most common overwintering hosts for the soybean aphid are Dahurian buckthorn and Japanese buckthorn (Rhamnus japonica). Dahurian buckthorn would likely be a primary host for soybean aphid in North America; however, Dahurian buckthorn is so uncommon in the soybean production areas that it is unlikely to be an important host [176]. Heimpel and others [91] provide a detailed discussion on the interactions of common buckthorn and the soybean aphid, discuss how these 2 organisms are components of an extensive invasional meltdown in North America, and discuss management issues surrounding these and 9 other cofacilitating Eurasian species.
Based on perceived or observed impacts, common buckthorn has been classified as a pest plant in several states and provinces:
Pest plant classification of common buckthorn in several US locations Location Classification Definition Minnesota Restricted noxious weed Importation, sale, and transportation of plants or propagating parts is illegal in the state [151] Missouri Category A-3 plant Plant species that are invading and disrupting native plant communities in 10 or fewer Missouri counties [152] Tennessee Watch List B Nonnative plant species that are severe problems in surrounding states but not yet reported in Tennessee as of 2001 [213] Vermont Class B noxious weed Nonnative species that are known to occur in Vermont and are considered to pose a serious threat. The movement, sale, and/or distribution of these plants are prohibited [223] Eastern Region Category 1 plant Nonnative, highly invasive plants which invade natural habitats and replace native species [216]In a survey of 60 land managers in Wisconsin, common buckthorn was one of the most frequently reported nonnative plants, and it was ranked among those having the greatest impact (3rd out of 66). It was perceived to be difficult to control and spreading on both recently disturbed and relatively undisturbed sites [179]. Common buckthorn was considered a "high" priority on the Ottawa National Forest in northern Michigan, where it occurred on 14 known sites with a total known infested area of 3 acres as of May 2005 [217]. Common buckthorn was rated among the "3 most important established and widespread invasive plants that warrants research" by 13% of land managers surveyed in the Midwest (Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin); however, less than 7% of researchers surveyed included common buckthorn in the top 3 [180]. Common buckthorn is one of several plants "voted as" invasive by the Massachusetts Invasive Plant Advisory Group [141].
Allelopathy: Secondary compounds, particularly emodin, have been found in many buckthorn species including common buckthorn [116]. It has been suggested that these compounds may contribute to invasion success. For example, emodin may deter insects and other herbivores from eating common buckthorn leaves, bark, and fruits, protect plants from pathogens and high light levels, have allelopathic effects on nearby plants, affect soil microorganisms, and affect fruit consumption and digestion by birds (Izhaki 2002 as cited by [116]).
Evidence for allelopathy from common buckthorn exudates is not consistent. Archibold and others [6] found no reduction in germination of crop seeds exposed to leachates from common buckthorn leaves. Conversely, Seltzner and Eddy (2003 as cited by [116]) found that common buckthorn leaf exudates reduced alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seed germination by 42%, and fruit exudates reduced germination to <1%; and Vincent (2006 as cited by [175]) found that common buckthorn fruit extracts reduced germination in crop seeds, and common buckthorn fruit debris reduced growth of crop seedlings. It has been suggested that emodin in common buckthorn fruits could adversely affect growth of native plants beneath common buckthorn canopies and that these effects may vary seasonally as well as among individual common buckthorn trees (Wilson personal communication cited by [116]). A review by Knight and others [116] suggests that more research is needed to understand the ecological significance of secondary chemicals in common buckthorn.
No information was available regarding allelopathy in Dahurian buckthorn (as of 2010).
Both common buckthorn and Dahurian buckthorn have historically been used medicinally and as a source of dye [242]. Substances in the bark, leaves, and fruits of common buckthorn are known to have strong purgative effects if eaten [200], and the fruit has been used for treating constipation [159,242]. A review by Qaderi and others [175] notes that parts of the common buckthorn plant have historically been used medicinally as a laxative and cathartic and to treat a number of other ailments including dropsy, gout, rheumatism, chronic skin diseases, and liver disorders; and extracts of common buckthorn exhibited antibacterial properties.
The bark and dried fruits of common buckthorn have been used as a source of yellow and saffron-colored dyes, and the fruit juice, when combined with alum, produces a green dye, once used by water-color artists [74,159,175]. The bark and fruit of Dahurian buckthorn are used for making a yellow dye [242].
The bark of common buckthorn is rich in tannin and was used as a tanning agent. The wood is marble-like with close grains and reddish veins. It is used in woodwork and carpentry. In Russia it has been used for ornamental art wares and plywood [74,175]. Common buckthorn wood is marketed in the United States because the yellow sapwood encircling rich orange heartwood has ornamental value [45]. The hard wood of Dahurian buckthorn has also been used for making furniture, and oil has been extracted from the seeds for lubricating oil [242].
Common buckthorn has been used as an ornamental in gardens, parks, and hedges [175], and both common buckthorn and Dahurian buckthorn were once recommended for shelterbelts because they are hardy and grow well on a variety of soil types [62,63]. Additionally, common buckthorn was recommended because it holds its leaves late in the fall, tolerates some shading, grows fast and produces an attractive hedge that is easy to culture [74].
Common buckthorn: Common buckthorn seedling establishment begins in early spring. In 1995, the first common buckthorn seedling of the season appeared in early April in London, Ontario. In 1993, 1994, and 1995, further flushes of seedlings appeared from May to September. Most seedlings emerged in May and June, but smaller cohorts arose at regular intervals until the end of August [175]. Common buckthorn germination was observed in mid- to late summer in Minnesota [116].
Budbreak of common buckthorn in North America has been recorded as early as 10 April in southern Wisconsin [88] and as late as early May in London, Ontario [175]. In southern Wisconsin in 1986, common buckthorn leaf emergence occurred around 10 April in the understory of a restored hardwood forest with a mature, closed canopy, and around 24 April in an open habitat [88]. Budbreak of planted, 1-year-old common buckthorn seedlings was not influenced by mulch (which caused higher mean minimum soil temperatures), and occurred 8.2 to 12.4 days after 9 April 2002 [205]. In London, Ontario, common buckthorn leaves were expanded by early May (2007, 2008) [175].
Common buckthorn flowers may appear with leaves [38,68]. In parts of the United States and Canada, common buckthorn begins flowering as early as May (see the table below). Common buckthorn fruits turn from green to red to black on ripening, and no flowers remain when fruits become black [71,175]. Fruits may ripen as early as August [200] but typically ripen in September in North America. In 1995 in London, Ontario, the first common buckthorn fruits appeared on 3 June and began to turn red by 7 August. By 5 September, about 20% of the fruits were red and 80% black. The fruits were fully ripe by mid-September. Timing of flowering and fruiting is generally delayed in the western and Maritime provinces compared with Ontario [175].
Flowering and fruiting dates reported for common buckthorn by geographic area. Blank cells indicate that information was not available. Area Flowering dates Fruiting dates United States Illinois May to June [156] Adirondacks June September [35] Great Plains May to June [77]Common buckthorn fruits have a strong tendency to persist on the branches [35,71,202] and may remain until December [202] or later [71]. Seed dispersal can occur anytime between September and April [65]. In 1995 in London, Ontario, drupes were fully ripe by mid-September, and by 5 November, almost 90% of them had fallen. However, some trees shed most fruits in late winter or early spring [175]. Common buckthorn seed dispersal was completed by 15 April in northwestern Oklahoma [86]. Timing of common buckthorn seed dispersal depends in part on the rate of removal by birds and therefore is related to their preference for it relative to cooccurring plants [65] (see Seed dispersal). In southern Wisconsin, American robins and cedar waxwings ate ripe common buckthorn fruit in October, November, March and April. Bird droppings containing common buckthorn seeds were found on top of the snow in February [74].
Common buckthorn retains its leaves until early November in southern Wisconsin [74,88]. In the early spring (April), most thorns from the previous year senesce before new ones develop; so, for a brief period, very few are apparent [175].
Wisconsin herbaria specimens of common buckthorn from a range of years and habitats were used to compile the following list of phenological extremes [74]:
Phenological events recorded on specimens of common buckthorn from Wisconsin herbaria [74]. Date Event 20 March Earliest leaf buds 28 March Earliest flower buds 9 May Oldest branch with last year's fruit intact 13 May Earliest flowers 1 June Earliest green fruit 7 July Latest flowers 31 July Latest green fruit 3 November Latest with leavesPhenological niche separation: In Europe, common buckthorn does not differ phenologically from associated shrub species [116], and it has been suggested that persistence and invasiveness of common buckthorn in North American forest understories may be caused in part by its relatively high carbon gain due to early budbreak and foliation relative to neighboring deciduous species [116,205]. Several studies demonstrate this pattern, although common buckthorn budbreak and foliation do not always precede those of associated native species [175]. Barnes [10] found that the leaves of common buckthorn flushed earlier in the spring and remained later in the fall compared to 5 cooccurring native shrubs at Noe Woods in the University of Wisconsin Arboretum in 1971. Mean duration of foliation of common buckthorn exceeded that of native shrubs by up to 54 days [10]. Another study at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum in 1986 [88] showed similar results, although differences in leaf longevities between nonnative shrubs (common buckthorn and Bell's honeysuckle) and native shrubs (gray dogwood and black cherry) in forest understories were less than those observed by Barnes [10]. During the 1986 study year, nonnatives had leaves present 21 to 28 days longer than the native species in both understory and open habitats [88]. Mean budbreak of common buckthorn was 5.7 days earlier than mean budbreak of native Carolina buckthorn (R. caroliniana) in irrigated plots in Iowa [205].
Extended leaf longevity in common buckthorn may increase its seasonal carbon gain compared to associated native species. Harrington and others [88] compared seasonal trends in photosynthesis of common buckthorn, Bell's honeysuckle, gray dogwood, and black cherry in understory and open habitats. In understory habitats, common buckthorn made approximately 38% of its total annual carbon gain while gray dogwood shrubs were leafless. In the open habitat, extended leaf longevity of nonnative shrubs contributed relatively less to annual carbon gain: No net carbon gain in common buckthorn was attributed to early photosynthesis, while late autumn photosynthesis accounted for only 3% and 4% of annual carbon gain in common buckthorn following senescence of gray dogwood and black cherry, respectively. Midday photosynthetic rates from mid-May to early October were roughly 10 times lower in understory shrubs than open-grown shrubs [88].
Forested areas invaded by common buckthorn may be shadier throughout the growing season than uninvaded areas. Light measurements, taken over a 3-month period in areas where common buckthorn occurred in relatively high densities, showed that percent light penetration was consistently less under common buckthorn at all height levels examined (6.5 feet (2 m), 3 feet (1 m), and ground). The difference in light penetration under common buckthorn was greatest early in the growing season (May), particularly at 6.5 feet (2 m) above the ground. As the season progressed and the canopy leafed out, light intensity beneath the forest in general, and common buckthorn in particular, declined. By June, light penetration under common buckthorn was only about 50% of that reaching the general forest floor; this was similar in July. In June and July, the percentage of light reaching the general forest floor was only slightly greater than that under common buckthorn in May [131].
Underground phenology: Woody species utilize stored, belowground carbohydrate reserves to survive dormancy and disturbance. These reserves naturally fluctuate over the course of a year, declining in the spring during leaf flush and shoot elongation and increasing during the growing season when excess photosynthate is produced (review by [183]). Total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) were lowest in common buckthorn root crowns during leaf expansion (June), and highest at bud break (April) and leaf senescence (October) of both 2002 and 2003 at Eagle Lake Regional Park, Minnesota [18]. See Use of prescribed fire as a control agent: Fire timing, for additional details of this study. At Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge in the Finger Lakes region of New York, periods of low TNC for common buckthorn included early spring just after full leaf expansion and stem elongation (May and June), early fall before leaf senescence, and during dry months. Thus, common buckthorn TNC decreased at the start of the growing season as expected but unexpectedly decreased at the end of the growing season. In 2001, common buckthorn TNC increased by almost 18% by August, but TNC declined by 8% between August and October (a period of low precipitation). In 2002, common buckthorn TNC increased over the growing season by 12%, then declined almost 12% between October and November. While the late-season drop was unexpected for both years, comparison of precipitation and TNC data suggested a trend of reduced TNC with below-average precipitation. The authors recommend that control treatments be timed to correspond with periods of low TNC to increase effectiveness [182].
Dahurian buckthorn: Considerably less information on the phenology of Dahurian buckthorn was available in published literature as of 2010. The following table shows the flowering and fruiting dates reported by area. Blank cells indicate that information was not available.
Area Flowering dates Fruiting dates Illinois May to June [156] Northern Great Plains June September [202] China May-June July to October [242] Japan May to June [56]Common buckthorn growth form differs among age classes and successional stages, and among open and shaded sites. At Wicken Fen in England, common buckthorn was described as a diffuse, many-stemmed bush up to 10 or 15 feet (3-5 m) tall in the early stages of succession, but in later stages it formed a single-stemmed tree, 31 feet (9.4 m) tall, with a dense crown 22 feet (6.7 m) in diameter [71]. Similarly, observations in Ontario indicate that mature common buckthorn shrubs exhibit 2 basic shapes: tall and narrow in open areas, and squat in areas with competing woody vegetation [175]. In Wisconsin, however, common buckthorn in shaded woodlands generally had a 1- or 2-stemmed trunk with few side branches, whereas open-grown trees in wetlands usually had multiple trunks with numerous side branches [74]. Common buckthorn growth habit has been described as dense, with interlocking branches [36,86].
Although no quantitative evidence was available to describe common buckthorn abundance in European habitats, scientists who have observed common buckthorn in mainland Europe report that large, dense thickets do not usually occur [116]. In England, however, it can form nearly monospecific stands in some fens [69,116]. This is evident in a series of maps of Wicken Fen shown by Godwin [69] in his 1936 publication and by Godwin and others [72] (dated 1972). The 1972 map shows dense and widespread stands of common buckthorn about 50 years after cessation of haying. The authors describe "enlargement and fusion of the crowns" of common buckthorn [72]. Dense, continuous, sometimes monospecific thickets of common buckthorn are often reported in areas where it is invasive in North America (e.g., [4,20,36,45,75,95,141,160]).
Common buckthorn is sometimes the dominant understory species where it invades North American forests (e.g., [6,140,246]) and may form dense, understory thickets in both the shrub [45,95] and herb layers [45], fundamentally altering the structure of invaded forest stands [140]. In some areas it forms large, nearly monotypic stands, with few other species in the shrub or herb layers [75]. Sapling densities as high as 34,600 stems/ha have been reported (Moriarty personal communication cited in [116]). A dense understory of common buckthorn seedlings is a common characteristic of mature common buckthorn stands in North America [6,45,74,243], though this is not reported from Europe [116,119]. The average number of seedlings beneath a dense common buckthorn stand in Saskatchewan was >100 seedlings /m² [6]. At 4 study sites in west-central Minnesota, selected specifically because of abundant common buckthorn populations and representing an "extreme" of regional common buckthorn invasion, common buckthorn was the most abundant tree species, accounting for more than 75% of the small tree (>7 feet (2 m) tall, <4 inches (10cm) DBH) composition. At one site it also comprised over 50% of all stems in the herbaceous layer. Common buckthorn seedlings were common throughout the sites, and seedling abundance increased exponentially with overstory common buckthorn abundance [243]. Where it occurred in open woods in eastern Ontario, many thousands of small common buckthorn saplings and seedlings covered the ground in shaded locations, and plants up to 12 feet (~4 m) tall occurred in openings [160]. In riparian woodland and shrub communities around Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, common buckthorn thickets occurred in a 2-layered understory beneath an open canopy of green ash and Manitoba maple (Acer negundo var. interius). The dense, taller common buckthorn layer was 7 to 16 feet (2-5 m) high and composed of well-spaced, mature, male and female shrubs. The shorter layer consisted of a ground cover dominated by common buckthorn seedlings and stunted saplings reaching 20 inches (50 cm) in height. A total of 71 nonfruiting and 72 fruiting stems with basal diameter >0.4 inch (1 cm) occurred in these plots, an equivalent of 9,467 stems/ha and 9,600 stems/ha, respectively [45]. Photo by Wisconsin DNR Photo by Wisconsin DNRCommon buckthorn may dominate a forest understory with thickets of sprouting stems (ramets) [140] and seedlings (genets) [6,45,74,140,243]. A study of mesic, floodplain, and swamp sites in southern Wisconsin found that ramets were more dense on common buckthorn-dominated than native-dominated sites (P<0.05), and that common buckthorn genets were more abundant than those of native trees up to and including size classes of 8 to 10 inches (20-25 cm) DBH. This evidence indicates that common buckthorn dominance can extend beyond understory size classes. Common buckthorn may dominate a site by reproducing sexually, generating numerous shoots, reaching large size, or some combination thereof. Among the 8 forest sites where common buckthorn was dominant, its mean relative density and basal area were 81% and 45%, respectively, exceeding that reported for 4 other woody invaders found in the northeastern United States. Compared to 8 native-dominated sites on similar soils, common buckthorn dominance fundamentally altered forest structure, especially by increasing density [140].
Mean density, basal area, and woody-species richness in native- versus common buckthorn-dominated sites in southern Wisconsin [140] Characteristic NativeCommon buckthorn typically has a patchy distribution in invaded woodlands. Individual common buckthorn plants on study sites in central New York were more strongly clumped in forests than in plantations, and those in old fields were intermediate in their degree of clumping [144]. Common buckthorn forms dense patches in the shrub layer of relict white oak-northern red oak woodlands in the Chicago area. Intervening, noninvaded areas have considerably less growth in the shrub layer [95]. Among 3 site types in central New York (old fields, plantations, and maple-beech forests), common buckthorn plants were generally aggregated, but moreso in smaller size classes: Seedlings were markedly aggregated at all old-field and plantation plots. Saplings were aggregated at 2 of 3 old-field and all 4 plantation plots. Adult plants were aggregated at 2 of 4 old-field and 3 of 4 plantation plots. These analyses were not conducted for maple-beech plots because of the low number of non-seedlings in those plots [144]. See the section on Shade tolerance for details on these study site attributes.
Common buckthorn density and stand structure likely vary among site types and plant communities. In southern Wisconsin, basal area of living common buckthorn stems on common buckthorn-dominated sites ranged from 3 to 48 m²/ha, with a mean of 15 m²/ha. Common buckthorn relative basal area varied significantly with landform type (P<0.05): Relative and absolute basal area averaged 7% and 4 m²/ha in floodplains, 58% and 14 m²/ha in mesic forest sites, and 83% and 34 m²/ha in swamps. At one swamp site, common buckthorn comprised 100% of all woody stems, reaching 48 m²/ha in living basal area. Common buckthorn ranked 1st or 2nd in basal area and density on the 3 mesic sites. Conversely, it occurred in the understory but was among the 3 most dominant species on only 1 of 3 floodplain sites [140]. Additional details of this study by Mascaro and Schnitzer are given in Successional Status. At the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, common buckthorn occurred in even-aged stands in both open wetlands and oak woodland understories, but common buckthorn trees were younger (see Life span) and larger (P<0.001) in the wetlands [74]. Among 3 site types in central New York (old fields, plantations, and maple-beech forests), common buckthorn density was lowest in maple-beech forests, and stems were almost entirely <0.4 inch (1 cm) in basal diameter. Similarly, populations of common buckthorn in old fields were dominated by seedlings (<0.2 inch (0.5 cm) basal diameter). Density of common buckthorn was highest in plantations, and populations were less skewed toward smaller age classes than in the other habitats (P<0.001) [144]. A typical common buckthorn thicket in Mary Mix McDonald Woods averaged 18 to 21 common buckthorn individuals more than 2.5 inches (5 cm) DBH per 100 m², with an average age of 33 to 34 years. A typical thicket at the East Woods averaged 12 individuals more than 2.5 inches (5 cm) DBH per 100 m², with an average age of 22 years (unpublished data cited by [93,95]).
No information was available regarding plant architecture or stand structure of Dahurian buckthorn (as of 2010).
Raunkiaer [177] life form:
Phanerophyte
Plant growth: Common buckthorn's growth rate is described as medium to fast [48]. Seedling growth has been described as "comparatively rapid". Seedlings averaged about 2 inches (5.2 cm) tall 29 days after germination. Common buckthorn saplings may grow 6.5 feet (2 m) in height per year [175]. Common buckthorn had one of the highest relative growth rates among 10 European shrub species tested in Great Britain [80]. Growth characteristics of common buckthorn grown in a garden in southern England are shown in the table below. Plots were weeded frequently during the first 4 years after planting [79].
Mean values (SE) for common buckthorn characteristics after 2 and 12 years of growth in garden plots [79] End of year 2 End of year 12 HeightResults of a greenhouse study led researchers to conclude that under favorable conditions, common buckthorn and North American native Carolina buckthorn establish similarly, but growth and photosynthesis of common buckthorn exceed those of Carolina buckthorn over time. Common buckthorn also produces more fruit than Carolina buckthorn [206].
Mean growth characteristics of common buckthorn over 98-days [206] Characteristic Day of harvest 0 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 Aboveground dry mass (g) 0.38 1.50 1.82 3.44 4.70 8.41 10.08 9.69 Root dry mass (g) 0.07 0.26 0.38 0.71 1.32 2.98 4.33 4.28 Root length (cm) 321 1,018 1,400 2,071 3,478 7,063 8,667 8,689 Relative growth rate (g/g/day) --- 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03Growth characteristics of common buckthorn in invaded natural areas are likely to vary due to differences in site characteristics, especially light availability. Five and 17-month-old common buckthorn seedlings planted in old fields in New York had significantly greater dry mass in open microsites than under herbs (P<0.025) [65]. Common buckthorn growth rates tended to be higher on moist and open sites at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [74,89].
Comparison of common buckthorn stem size and age on 3 sites at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [74] Site Mean (SD) age in years Mean (SD) circumference in inches Mean circumference growthAt the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, common buckthorn aboveground growth rates were greater in open habitat (0.58 g/g/year) than in hardwood forest understory (0.23 g/g/year) (P<0.0001). The understory site was a restored hardwood forest with a mature, closed canopy; the open site was the edge of a hedgerow, 820 feet (250 m) from the understory site. Common buckthorn aboveground growth rate was significantly higher than those of Bell's honeysuckle, gray dogwood, and black cherry in the open habitat, but it did not differ in the understory habitat (P=0.05). Common buckthorn and black cherry had the highest annual net carbon gain in the open habitat, while Bell's honeysuckle had the highest in the understory habitat. Among the 4 shrub species, common buckthorn ranked second after black cherry for mean daily maximum photosynthesis [89].
Common and Dahurian buckthorn were planted and their growth and survival monitored in Mandan, North Dakota. Common buckthorn individuals were planted in 1918. They averaged 6.1 feet (1.9 m) tall after 10 years and 7.4 feet (2.3 m) after 32 years, with medium crown spread. Common buckthorn was described as having a shrubby, dense habit. Dahurian buckthorn individuals were planted in 1929. They averaged 7.4 feet (2.3 m) tall after 10 years and 14.1 feet (4.3 m) tall after 32 years. Dahurian buckthorn was described as having dense growth and a wide crown spread that can equal or exceed its height [63]. Another study in the northern Great Plains reports that of 15 Dahurian buckthorn plants planted, average height at 5 years was 3.3 feet (1 m), and crown spread averaged 3.1 feet (0.9 m) [62].
Plant response to fire: A single fire is not likely to kill common buckthorn, but its abundance may be reduced by frequent fires. Common buckthorn can be difficult to burn, however [4]. Common buckthorn typically sprouts from the root crown following top-kill from fire [4,20], and sprouts may be prolific [4]. Common buckthorn seedlings are killed by fire [4,20,214], although the age or size at which seedlings can survive and sprout is not clear. Common buckthorn seedling density may increase in the postfire environment. Bare soil and increased light after fire may facilitate common buckthorn seedling establishment [18].
Common buckthorn can persist or establish after a single fire and persists even after frequent fires, although its abundance may be reduced by frequent fires. Common buckthorn either established or persisted after a single fire in an Ontario woodland dominated by northern whitecedar. It occurred on 1 of 5 sites 100 days after a high-severity fire on 23 June 1999. No prefire information was provided [33]. Common buckthorn persisted, but at lower densities in all size classes, after 17 years of annual, dormant-season prescribed fire in an oak woodland at the Morton Arboretum, Illinois [22]. See the Research Paper by Bowles and others [22] for details.
Large common buckthorn individuals may survive fire, while smaller individuals may be top-killed and sprout from the root crown. In a mixed-hardwood forest that developed from a mesic savanna on the Reed Turner Nature Preserve in Illinois, common buckthorn was little affected by a single fire in autumn 1986. Stems larger than 2 inches (5 cm) in diameter showed little initial response to fire, either in mortality or sprouting. About 10% of common buckthorn individuals with 2- to 4-inch (10 cm) diameter stems were top-killed. The first season after fire, common buckthorn sprouting rate was 30 times greater in burned versus unburned plots [4,83]. At Pipestone National Monument, spring (mid-April to mid-May) prescribed burning top-killed common buckthorn but it sprouted [20].
Common buckthorn seedlings are susceptible to fire. Common buckthorn seedlings in the ground-layer vegetation decreased substantially (>50%) after a single fire in autumn 1986 in Illinois mixed-hardwood forest that developed from a mesic savanna [4,83]. Seedlings that survive or establish following removal of adults can be killed by heating until wilted with a propane torch. It is suggested that torching be done during the next growing season to be effective [214], implying that older seedlings may sprout (see Spot-burning). Spring burning at Pipestone National Monument killed common buckthorn seedlings [20].
Only one reference providing insight to Dahurian buckthorn's possible relationship to fire was found in the available literature as of 2010: A 150-foot² (14-m²) old field in the Spicebush Swamp Preserve in West Hartford, Connecticut, burned in 1969. When the area was observed in 1976, R. davurica subsp. davurica was especially dense and other woody and herbaceous plants were virtually excluded [173].
Pollination and breeding system: Common buckthorn is either dioecious [26,38,68,71,202,242] with unisexual flowers borne on separate plants, or polygamodioecious [55,77], with some hermaphrodite flowers [175]. Common buckthorn flowers are honey-scented and insect-pollinated. Insect visitors are abundant [71]. Pollinators are typically bees (Hymenoptera) and flies (Diptera) [175].
Counts of fruiting common buckthorn shrubs at Wicken Fen and Gog-Magog Hills in England showed a ratio of 6:1 or 7:1 of female to male shrubs. Statistical analysis indicated no change in the ratio with age or habitat condition [71]. Norman and others (unpublished data cited by [175]) also found a majority of female trees in 6 out of 7 sites in London, Ontario; usually the ratio of females to males was greater than 3:1. Numbers of fruiting and nonfruiting stems were near equal in riparian woodland and shrub communities studied near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan [45].
Few published studies on seed banking of common buckthorn were available as of 2010. Common buckthorn seed densities under mature common buckthorn individuals or stands may range from 15 seeds/m² [45] to 5,000/m² [175]. Common buckthorn seeds may remain viable in the soil for several years. Seeds in intact fruit may be viable but dormant, so fruit remaining on branches may comprise an aerial seed bank, while fallen fruits may contribute to the soil seed bank.
Flooding and seed predation may affect common buckthorn seed bank density. Four studies report a wide range of common buckthorn seed densities in the soil seed bank under mature common buckthorn. Seed banks beneath large, 26-foot-tall (8 m), fruiting trees of common buckthorn in the Sifton Bog Conservation Area in London, Ontario, all had more than 1,000 seeds/m², and some had up to 5,000 seeds/m² (Cavers and others unpublished data cited by [175]). The buried seed bank beneath mature common buckthorn shrubs in a population near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, averaged 620 seeds/m² in the top 4 inches (10 cm) of soil and was composed entirely of common buckthorn. Common buckthorn seedlings emerged from all soil samples collected from beneath this stand [6]. In a riparian woodland near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, on-ground fruit counts were 124 fruits/m², and density of common buckthorn seeds in the top 4 inches of soil averaged 15 seeds/m² [45]. Common buckthorn seeds placed in water in the spring retained some viability (77% germinated after 2 weeks), but seeds became nonviable after 2 months of immersion [6]. This suggests that high water levels during spring runoff could reduce common buckthorn density in the soil seed bank. In second-growth riparian forest along Little Otter Creek in Vermont, mature common buckthorn shrubs occurred in understory plots 16 to 82 feet (5-25 m) from the stream edge. Little Otter Creek is an unregulated stream that floods into the riparian forest to distances of about 328 feet (100 m) from the stream edge each spring; the riparian forest is free of standing water by mid-June. Common buckthorn seeds were not detected in the seed rain 5 m from the stream; they occurred at a density of 16,000 seeds/ha at 15 m and at a density of 8,000 seeds/ha at 25 m. Common buckthorn seeds were not detected in the soil seed bank either 5 or 25 m from the stream edge (the seed bank was not sampled at 49 feet (15 m) from the stream edge) [105].
Common buckthorn seeds may remain viable in the soil for at least 2 years [71] and possibly as long as 6 years (Ahrens 1999 as cited by [191], management guidelines by [78]). Seeds survive the winter either in the soil seed bank or in shriveled fruits on parent plants [175]. Archibold and others [6] recorded a germination rate of 88% for fresh common buckthorn seed, which was followed by a rapid loss of viability that resulted in few seeds germinating beyond 1 year of dispersal. Miller (2005 as cited by [45]) also reported that only a small fraction of the annual common buckthorn seed crop remains viable beyond the first year. In a riparian woodland near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, total fruit production, on-ground fruit counts, and density of seeds in the top 4 inches (10 cm) of soil were reduced after 74% of fruiting stems had been killed using 2 treatments over 6 years. In untreated versus treated plots examined 1 year after the second treatment, on-ground fruit counts were 124 fruits/m² versus 1 fruit/m², and soil seed bank densities were 15 seeds/m² versus 7 seeds/m², respectively [45]. The depletion of the seed bank implies that most common buckthorn seeds do not persist beyond the first year of dispersal. However, observations in Michigan indicated dense seedling establishment following the removal of mature common buckthorn shrubs and, after hand-pulling over 125,000 seedlings from approximately 540 feet² (50 m²), the area was soon revegetated again with common buckthorn from the disturbed seed bank and missed seedlings [214].
Under field conditions, common buckthorn seeds inside intact fruits may remain viable longer than seed separated from fruits. Common buckthorn fruits were collected from trees in London, Ontario, in early April 1993. Whole undamaged fruits and washed separated seeds were placed in artificial soil in a greenhouse. The separated seeds germinated quickly with up to 80% producing seedlings in 3 weeks, but seeds in whole fruits germinated slowly and intermittently over a 5-month period (Cavers and Thomas unpublished data cited by [175]). In some years, dried fruits remained on common buckthorn trees for a year or more, and the seeds inside them remained viable. This aerial seed bank included seeds that eventually germinated more than 1.5 years after they were produced [175]. Archibold and others [6] suggested that under field conditions the rotting of common buckthorn fruit may delay germination until spring. Seeds extracted and dried to a moisture content of about 10% showed high germination and emergence rates after storage at 27 °F (-3 °C) for 3.5 years [215].
Common buckthorn seeds are dispersed primarily by gravity and birds and may also be dispersed by other animals or by water. Humans disperse common buckthorn by planting it for hedges, shelterbelts, and other uses ([160], review by [74]). Once shrubs mature, long-distance spread is facilitated by vertebrate dispersers, especially birds that consume the fleshy, juicy fruits [35,202]. The seeds have a laxative effect [54] that facilitates distribution [90]. The rate and degree of long-distance spread depend on availability and habits of dispersers (review by [104]). Varied accounts in the literature and observations cited by Qaderi and others [175] imply differences in dispersal patterns among years and among individual common buckthorn trees. In some years, many fruits remain on common buckthorn trees for 12 months or more, shriveling during the summer months. In other years fruits start to drop in late autumn and continue to be shed intermittently over winter [175]. Catling and Porebski [32] stated that common buckthorn fruits are retained on shrubs until the following spring unless eaten.
Common buckthorn seed and seedling densities tend to be greater in areas where density of adult common buckthorn shrubs is high, and seedling density is especially high under common buckthorn canopies (see stand structure). Soil samples taken from 4 alvar communities in Chaumont Barren Preserves, New York, revealed a relationship between the number of seeds and the number of adults present in each community, suggesting that most of the seeds found in each community came from local adults [188]. Archibold and others [6] found that about 90% of common buckthorn fruits and seeds in their Saskatchewan study fell directly beneath the canopies of mature female shrubs. This resulted in a dense understory of common buckthorn seedlings. Common buckthorn seedlings and young trees often occur at the bases of large common buckthorn trees or under some other fruiting tree, shrub, or other perch site (e.g., fencerows, hedges) [6,74,158].
Despite the fruit's bitter taste and relative unpalatability, many species of birds in both North America [6,74,116,190,231] and Europe [71,116] have been observed eating common buckthorn fruit, and the seeds are dispersed by regurgitation or defecation [74,119,234]. Exposed seeds may also be eaten by birds [69]. In a 2-year study in New York, 64% to 100% of the fruit on common buckthorn shrubs at 2 sites was consumed by birds (Sherburne 1972 as cited by [116]). In old fields in central New York, common buckthorn seed rain was concentrated within 10 to 16 feet (3-5 m) of parent plants, nonfruiting common buckthorn plants, and artificial perches [144]. In mature scrub in Germany, about 28% of total common buckthorn seed rain was composed of seeds that were regurgitated or defecated by birds [119]. Of 1,455 fruits on one common buckthorn shrub observed at Wicken Fen, 431 fruits and about 69 seeds were collected in a trap below the canopy on 24 December 1932. An additional 1,004 fruits were presumed to have been eaten by birds and the seed dispersed elsewhere in their feces [69].
Mammals such as rodents [65,69,143], white-tailed deer [161], and elk (Ridley 1930 as cited by [36]) may eat common buckthorn fruits and disperse the seeds (see Seed predation). Although mouse predation of seeds may impede seedling recruitment, stores of cached seeds that are not retrieved by mice may germinate [69]. Two common buckthorn seeds germinated from white-tailed deer feces collected from a mixed-deciduous forest site near Ithaca, New York [161]. See Importance to Wildlife for more information on animals that consume common buckthorn seeds and fruits.
Common buckthorn fruits can float and remain viable in water, and thus be dispersed by rivers and streams. Fresh common buckthorn seeds and fruits can float for several hours in still water and up to 30 minutes in agitated water (unpublished experiments cited by [175]). Praeger (1913 cited by [71]) reported that dry common buckthorn fruits can float for 6 days and seeds for 3.5 days. Seventy-seven percent of common buckthorn seeds germinated after being placed in water for 2 weeks in the spring in Saskatchewan [6].
According to management guidelines [199], birds eat the fruit of all nonnative buckthorns, including Dahurian buckthorn, and the severe laxative effect of the fruit helps distribute the seed. As of 2010, no additional information was available on seed dispersal in Dahurian buckthorn.
The age at which common buckthorn begins to produce fruit and seed is unclear and may depend on growing conditions. Delanoy and Archibold [45] indicate that common buckthorn typically requires 5 to 6 years before it fruits, while a review by Knight and others [116] says that reproduction has been reported in common buckthorn shrubs 9 to 20 years old in North America. Godwin [71] states that it "flowers and fruits very early, certainly at 11 years" in Great Britain. In a garden in southern England, common buckthorn produced fruit at age 4, and all individuals reproduced annually after their first reproduction [79]. Common buckthorn seedlings in open wetlands, one measuring 57 inches (144 cm) in height and 1 inch (2.5 cm) in circumference, produced fruit. Common buckthorn of this size occurring in a nearby oak woodland usually did not bear fruit [74].
Quantitative information on common buckthorn seed production is limited. Fruit production in common buckthorn has been described as "very prolific" [69] in southern England, and observations in northwestern Oklahoma noted a "heavy crop" of fruit [86]. A total of 249 common buckthorn fruits and 174 seeds was collected in seed traps under 3 large female common buckthorn shrubs in a population south of Saskatoon; the trays were set out in October and retrieved the following spring [6]. A many-stemmed common buckthorn, 7 feet (2 m) tall, bore 1,455 fruits on 27 September 1932 in southern England [69]. In a nature reserve in southwestern Germany, seed rain was measured using seed traps placed along transects through mature scrub (generally 30-50 years old and 13-20 feet (4-6 m) tall), of which common buckthorn was a component. A total of 1,402 common buckthorn seeds was collected from primary seed rain (intact fruits) and 546 from secondary seed rain (seeds that were regurgitated or defecated by birds; i.e., exposed seeds) [119].
Site conditions are likely to affect fruit production in common buckthorn. Godwin [71] suggests that few fruits are produced in "exposed places", and many of these fruits have nonviable seeds. In southern Wisconsin, common buckthorns in open wetlands seemed to produce more fruit than those in oak woodland or lowland forest sites, although similar numbers of seedlings occurred in each site type [74].
A study in central New York found that total common buckthorn seed rain was affected by both presence of artificial perches and by habitat type. Seed rain of common buckthorn was among the highest of 6 nonnative and 10 native taxa collected in seed traps in 3 habitats. One-half of the seed traps at each plot were provisioned with an artificial perch. Common buckthorn seed rain reflected the local density of adult plants in each habitat and was consistently higher in traps under perches, reflecting the importance of dispersal by birds [145].
Total common buckthorn seeds collected in ten 1-m² seed traps in 4 plots in each of 3 habitats in central New York between June 2003 and June 2004 [145] Habitat Perch No perch Maple-beech 3 0 Old field 39 12 Plantation 14 4Common buckthorn fruits contain 2 to 5 seeds [69,74,130,232], but they generally have 4, and usually only 1 or 2 mature [202]. A study in London, Ontario, reported over 85% of common buckthorn fruits contained 4 seeds, but 42% of fruits had only 1 viable seed. Trees with small fruit crops had fewer seeds per fruit but often had heavier seeds. Individual seed weights ranged from <1 mg to 41 mg, but no seeds weighing less than 10 mg were viable (Major 1986 as cited by [175]). Details on resource allocation and morphology of common buckthorn fruits are presented by Lee and others [130].
As of this writing (2010), no information was available regarding seed production in Dahurian buckthorn, other than the following observation: At the Spicebush Swamp Preserve in West Hartford, Connecticut, "heavy fruiting" of Rhamnus davurica subsp. davurica was observed during each of 3 consecutive years [173].
Seed predation: Predation of common buckthorn seeds affects total seed rain and is likely to vary among sites. A study in Germany found that common buckthorn seeds had 0% survival (100% predation) in mature scrub, 36% survival in pioneer scrub, and 53% survival in an abandoned meadow. Rodents were the main seed predators [119]. Studies of seed predation in old fields in Tompkins County, New York, found greater predation under herb cover than in openings. The study was conducted in October and November (during or after the main period of seed dispersal) of 1985 and 1986. In 1985, all of the seeds in openings were accounted for, while 100% of the seeds under herbs were missing, indicating 100% predation. In 1986 there was no difference in seed counts under herbs or in openings. Apparently, most seeds were consumed by small nocturnal rodents, particularly deer mice [65]. A study in Madison County, New York, found that common buckthorn seed predation by rodents and invertebrates varied among habitats. Rates of postdispersal seed predation were highest in maple forests and lowest in old fields. Predation was attributed primarily to granivorous rodents [143]. In a similar study in the same location, seed predators selected native species over nonnatives when offered seeds of 5 species: natives silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), and red raspberry; and nonnatives common buckthorn, Morrow's honeysuckle, and multiflora rose. Significantly fewer seeds of common buckthorn (5 out of 27), Morrow's honeysuckle, and multiflora rose were lost after 1 night of visitation by granivorous rodents (P>0.05) [195].
Common buckthorn seedlings can occur at high densities near adult conspecifics, and seedling mortality rates may be relatively low in some areas. Seedlings may establish best in areas with shallow litter or bare soil.
Common buckthorn seedlings, sometimes in high densities, are often observed near parent shrubs in invaded areas [6,74,144,175,243] (see stand structure), and densities of common buckthorn seedlings beneath parent shrubs may be higher than in surrounding areas [144,175,243]. Common buckthorn seedling density beneath a dense common buckthorn stand near Saskatoon averaged 110.8 seedlings/m² at the end of the first growing season; by early spring the following year it had increased to 123.7 seedlings/m². Seedling density was lower (~74 seedlings/m²) in a sample quadrats adjacent to a game trail where the soil was very compacted, but even there common buckthorn dominated the ground layer [6]. In Sifton Bog and the Medway Valley in London, Ontario, researchers recorded over 900 common buckthorn seedlings/m² in some quadrats beneath large female trees but usually <5 seedlings/m² beneath male trees (Norman and others unpublished data cited by [175]). Common buckthorn seedlings were common throughout 4 study sites in west-central Minnesota, and seedling abundance increased exponentially with abundance of overstory common buckthorn [243]. In central New York, common buckthorn seedlings were positively associated with fruiting adult plants on 4 old-field plots and on 2 of 4 plantation plots (P<0.05) [144].
Mature common buckthorn shrubs may have positive or neutral effects on common buckthorn seedling growth and survival. At the Warner Nature Center in east-central Minnesota, common buckthorn seedlings growing near mature conspecifics exhibited greater growth and survival than seedlings far from mature shrubs in similar light environments [118], possibly due to increased fertility from common buckthorn leaf litter [115]. In a garden in Europe, common buckthorn seedling mortality rates were not significantly different (P>0.05) under common buckthorn shrubs and other shrub species [119].
While a common buckthorn canopy does not appear to reduce seedling establishment and growth, it may inhibit seedling persistance. Researchers recorded densities of 20 to 200 large (3- to 12-inch (7-30 cm) tall) common buckthorn seedlings/m² beneath the female trees near London, Ontario; however, few taller seedlings were recorded (Norman and others unpublished data cited by [175]). Many common buckthorn seedlings were observed growing under parent trees at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum; however, common buckthorn saplings seemed not to survive under parent trees, while saplings around the canopy perimeters did [74]. Differences among studies may be due to differences in stand structure and corresponding light levels experienced by the seedlings, or difference in other site characteristics that can influence common buckthorn seedling establishment, survival, and growth.
Common buckthorn seedling emergence may be better on bare soil than on soil with a dense litter or herbaceous layer, although persistence may be similar among microsites. In field tests, a higher percentage of common buckthorn seed germinated on bare soil than on soil with a dense litter or herbaceous layer. While germination was better on bare soil, survival to the next spring was similar among treatments with bare soil, bare and scratched soil, and dense herbaceous cover [74]. Fewer common buckthorn seedlings were observed in sites with thick red oak leaf litter than in sites with less leaf litter at Eagle Lake Park, Minnesota. Common buckthorn seedling emergence, height, and biomass decreased with increasing litter depth in both field (open oak woodlands) and greenhouse studies, but litter depths up to 2 inches (5.1 cm) did not prevent seedling emergence and survival [18].
Photos by S. Kelly KearnsThe effects of litter on common buckthorn seedling establishment may be related to reduced light and lower temperatures associated with litter. Regression analyses showed that common buckthorn seedling density decreased with lower light transmittance in both greenhouse and field studies, and increasing soil temperature increased common buckthorn seedling establishment in the greenhouse [18]. See Shade tolerance for more information on the effects of light on common buckthorn seedling establishment and growth.
Other site characteristics may influence common buckthorn seedling establishment and persistence. A regression model found a positive correlation between common buckthorn seedling density and soil cation exchange capacity and percent clay (P<0.05), both of which are related to soil water holding capacity [131]. Preliminary results suggest that North American soil biota may impact common buckthorn growth. European soil biota did not have a negative effect on common buckthorn, except in low light. North American soil biota had a large negative effect on common buckthorn in all light levels, which was consistent on common buckthorn individuals from 4 different populations [115].
Seedling mortality: Reported mortality rates of common buckthorn seedlings vary among studies and observations, likely a result of differences in site characteristics and plant and animal community compositions. Studies comparing establishment and survival of European shrub species found common buckthorn was among the species with the lowest mortality rates [80,119]. Researchers in London, Ontario, recorded high densities of common buckthorn seedlings under parent plants but noted that most seedlings died in their first summer, probably from drought, predation, and/or deep shade (Norman and others unpublished data cited by [175]). In Madison County, New York, common buckthorn seedlings in maple forest plots experienced higher mortality rates (>60%) than those in old field and plantation plots (~30% mortality). Causes of mortality were uncertain [143].
Mortality of common buckthorn seedlings may result from a variety of causes, including desiccation, frost, fungal pathogens, herbivory, and competition for resources from other plant species [65,119,143,175]. Common buckthorn seedling mortality due to frost damage has been observed in old fields in New York [65] and on peat soils in Europe [71]. Observations of common buckthorn seedlings in Ontario suggest that seedlings that emerged in spring were mature enough to withstand frost damage the following winter [175].
Herbivory may be a major cause of common buckthorn seedling mortality on some sites. In old fields in central New York, survival of common buckthorn seedlings was 5 times lower for seedlings growing under herbs than those growing in the open. During the growing season, herbivory by rodents (especially meadow voles) was the main source of mortality in both microsite types. Over winter, frost heaving caused 62% of seedling mortality in open microsites and 40% under herbs, while herbivory caused 60% of mortality of under herbs. Overall survivorship during the study was greatest in the open. The probability that seeds of common buckthorn landing in the open would produce seedlings that survived until the end of the 1st growing season was 0.23 and until the beginning of the 2nd season was 0.15. The probability that seeds under herbs would produce seedlings that survived to the end of the 1st growing season was 0.00012 and until the beginning of the 2nd season was 0.00007 [65]. Common buckthorn seedlings may be more vulnerable to herbivory in old fields than in plantations or sugar maple forests [143].
As of this writing (2010), no information was available regarding shade tolerance or successional status of Dahurian buckthorn. Information in the following sections applies to common buckthorn.
Shade tolerance: Common buckthorn tolerates shade [6,71] but may be more abundant and grow more quickly under intermediate levels of sunlight [4,74,89,131] if moisture is not limiting [120,243]. Heidorn [90] suggests that common buckthorn requires more light than Dahurian buckthorn, although the reasons for this assertion are unclear.Throughout its worldwide distribution, common buckthorn does not typically occur in densely shaded communities [74]; however, qualitative descriptions of invaded communities suggest some shade tolerance in common buckthorn. In its native range, common buckthorn frequently occurs in open areas or forest edges [116]. It occurs in similar environments in its invaded range (see Habitat Types and Plant Communities), but it can also establish and persist in closed-canopy forests and is sometimes a dominant understory species in forests and woodlands [6,74,120,131,140,158,226]. In the Thames River watershed in London, Ontario, common buckthorn was positively correlated with canopy closure (P=0.002) [226]. Common buckthorn seedlings are common in low-light environments such as the shade of mature common buckthorn trees [6,74,243] (see Seedling establishment) and at the base of other shrubs and trees where birds perch and deposit seed (see Seed dispersal). Common buckthorn seedlings below a large common buckthorn shrub at Wicken Fen branched and produced leaves in the shade [69,72]. However, most common buckthorn seedlings observed in areas of deep shade in London, Ontario, died [175].
Several studies indicate higher densities and/or greater persistence and growth of common buckthorn at intermediate light levels. At 4 study sites in west-central Minnesota, common buckthorn did not grow well in light, dry microsites and grew in substantially darker microsites than bur oak did; however, common buckthorn seedling abundance peaked at intermediate light levels [243]. In an experiment where seedlings of common buckthorn were grown in a forest understory across a light gradient from 1% to 16% midsummer canopy openness, seedling biomass and survival were greater in the highest-light environments after 3 years (P<0.0001) [118]. In a greenhouse experiment, common buckthorn seedling survival and growth were best in 25% to 50% full light. The number of seedlings was reduced in 100% full light, but those that established grew well. Seedlings in the 12.5% light level grew slowly and were "quite sprawling" [74]. Survival of transplanted common buckthorn seedlings was lower in shadier maple forests than in old fields and plantations in central New York [143], and seedling abundance was significantly greater on sites with greater light at the forest floor (P=0.019) [144].
Common buckthorn can survive in deep shade in experimental settlings (e.g., [80]); however, growth and abundance tend to decrease with increased shade (e.g., [80,118,131]). Aboveground growth rates of common buckthorn were greater in an open habitat (0.58 g/g/year) than in a hardwood forest understory (0.23 g/g/year) in southern Wisconsin [89]. See Plant growth for more information on this study. In the greenhouse, Leitner [131] found a general decrease in common buckthorn growth as light decreased; this was especially pronounced under the greatest degree of shading (23% of total exterior solar radiation). In upland, oak woodlots in southeastern Wisconsin, common buckthorn tree/shrub and seedling densities appeared to decrease with shade, and tree/shrub density appeared to increase with canopy openness [131]. See Habitat Types and Plant Communities:Forest and woodland for further details from Leitner's study. In remnant oak savannas in southern Wisconsin [129] and old fields in southeastern New Hampshire [103], common buckthorn was associated with intermediate light levels [129]. In central New York, common buckthorn density was greater on plantation and old-field sites, which had intermediate light levels. Common buckthorn occurred in maple-beech forests, although it was closer to walking trails than expected in those forests (P<0.05), with a strong tendency to occur within 33 feet (10 m) of the trail [144].
Mean attributes of 4 plots in each of 3 site types in central New York. All woody plants >1 m in height and all common buckthorn individuals were censused at each plot. Values within columns followed by different letters are significantly different (P<0.05) [144]. Site type Tree density/haCommon buckthorn is present in forests dominated by maple (Acer spp.), pine (Pinus spp.), or spruce (Picea spp.) and fir (Abies spp.), although it occurs at low densities and is typically confined to trail edges or gaps in the canopy. Reduced growth and abundance of common buckthorn at very low light levels suggests the very deep shade of these ecosystems may limit common buckthorn invasion as compared with other deciduous forests, shrublands, and grasslands where common buckthorn is common [74].
Common buckthorn reproduction may be best at intermediate light levels, and its shade tolerance may decrease with age. At the University of Wisconsin Arboretum, common buckthorn grew and reproduced in both open wetlands and oak woodlands, and similar numbers of seedlings occurred in each site type. In the open wetlands, common buckthorn trees were younger, larger, and produced more fruit, and common buckthorn seedlings produced fruit at an earlier age than in the oak woods. Shade in the oak woods ranged from 9% to 23% of total sunlight. Many common buckthorn seedlings were observed growing under parent trees in this study; however, common buckthorn saplings seemed not to survive there, but grew around the canopy perimeters [74].
Lower common buckthorn seedling establishment in areas with surface litter may be a function of light availability. Regression analyses showed that common buckthorn seedling density and biomass decreased with lower light transmittance at the soil surface in greenhouse and field experiments [18]. However, many common buckthorn seedlings survive in deep shade (1-2% of full light in midsummer) in the field [118].
Success of common buckthorn seedlings under parent shrubs may be related to factors other than light availability, such as reduced competition with herbaceous species for water and nutrients or facilitation from mature common buckthorn trees. In an oak-dominated forest in east-central Minnesota, common buckthorn seedlings growing near mature conspecifics exhibited greater growth and survival than seedlings far from mature conspecifics in similar light environments [118].
Competition for soil resources can affect common buckthorn seedling survival and growth in shade (e.g., [80,115]). A significant interaction between the effects of irradiance and nutrient supply was observed for common buckthorn (P<0.01) [80]:
Seedling mortality and total dry mass of seedlings of common buckthorn after 110 days in 4 shade treatments on soils with differing nutrient supply [80] Numbers of plants dying Mean (SE) dry mass (mg) % daylight 0.3% 1.6% 11% 63% 0.3% 1.6% 11% 63% Grassland (low nutrient supply) 1 0 0 0 20 (3) 45(8) 366(40) 956(98) Scrubland (high nutrient supply) 3 0 0 0 16 (1) 40(3) 458(52) 2145(252)The number of common buckthorn leaves per plant, total leaf area, and shoot height increased significantly with higher irradiance (P<0.001) and was higher on nutrient-rich soil (P<0.05). Plants responded to increased shading with etoliated stems and decreased root length (P<0.001) [80]. Preliminary results from a field experiment at the Warner Nature Center in east-central Minnesota found that common buckthorn seedlings with no interference from understory plants showed a strong positive response to light with increased survival and growth. However, in subplots planted with native herbaceous plants (to create belowground competition), common buckthorn seedlings had only a small response to increased light [115]. Five- and 17-month-old, experimentally planted common buckthorn seedlings in old fields in New York had significantly greater dry mass in open microsites than under herbs. Growth was also greater for seedlings competing for soil resources than for those competing for light (P<0.025) [65]. These results are consistent with data that show decreased common buckthorn seedling abundance in areas with greater cover of understory herbaceous plants [117] and native shrubs [116].
Desiccation and competition from other plants in open areas may restrict common buckthorn to shaded areas in some habitats [120,243]. Within the grassland biome of North America, common buckthorn is associated with shrublands, hedgerows, lowland river vegetation, and open woods [74]. A detailed survey at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum indicates that common buckthorn is very rare in prairies and savannas, but it is most common and grows best on sites that are either open or moist or both [74,75]. At 4 study sites in west-central Minnesota, common buckthorn saplings were found in significantly darker microsites with higher soil moisture than those where bur oak occurred. Light and soil moisture explained approximately half of the variation in growth seen among common buckthorn saplings [243]. Common buckthorn was not common at Wolf Road Prairie Nature Preserve in Illinois, a rare savanna remnant with an open overstory of mature bur oak. However, it occurred most frequently on sites with lowest mean photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) (about 143.1 mol/m²/sec) and less frequently on sites with a mean PAR ranging from about 164.7 to 826.6 mol/m²/sec [23].
Establishment and persistence of common buckthorn in shade may depend on propagule pressure. Common buckthorn was artificially seeded at varied rates into 1-m² treatment plots with varied light and nutrient availability in a 60-year-old red pine plantation in Ontario. Percent cover of common buckthorn was dependent on both resource availability and propagule pressure (seeding rate). Common buckthorn had significantly greater average cover in shaded subplots (2.3%) than in unshaded subplots (1.3%) (P=0.003), and high propagule pressure subplots had significantly greater common buckthorn cover, density, and aboveground biomass than low or no pressure subplots (P<0.001) [212]. A roost area in a 16-acre (6.5-ha) forested wetland in New Jersey characterized by a dense, closed canopy with a sparse shrub layer of southern arrowwood and highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum) was first noted by Moskowitz [158] in August 1992. In August 1993, changes in the vegetative community beneath the roost were apparent. There was more than 50% mortality of highbush blueberry and a pronounced change in the species composition of the understory, including seedlings of 4 new species beneath the roost: common buckthorn, American black elderberry (Sambucus nigra subsp. canadensis), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), and bittersweet nightshade (Solanum dulcamara). Common buckthorn increased from 0% cover on 6 August 1992 to 15% cover on 14 August 1993 [158], likely a result of high propagule pressure from seed in bird feces. No changes were observed in the vegetation of the wetland beyond the limits of the roost. Vegetation changes under the roost suggest a change toward more upland and facultative upland species and a loss of obligate and facultative wetland species [158].
Successional role: Little information was available regarding common buckthorn's successional role where it is native, with the exception of a detailed study at Wicken Fen in southern England. On alkaline peat at Wicken Fen, common buckthorn is characteristic of seral communities and codominates with glossy buckthorn, large gray willow, and other shrubs if left uncut. In the early stages of succession from mixed sedge communities to shrub carr after cessation of haying, glossy buckthorn is frequent. As carr ages, undergrowth is killed out and common buckthorn tends to replace both glossy buckthorn and large gray willow. Succession proceeds toward dense and widespread stands of common buckthorn about 50 years after cessation of haying [69,70,71,72]. The character of the shrub stages depends on initial densities of colonizing shrubs [69,70]. The rapid overtaking of glossy buckthorn by common buckthorn at Wicken Fen was apparently the result of severe and widespread fungal attack on glossy buckthorn [69] and may not represent the "typical" successional pattern. Godwin and others [72] provide further details of plant community changes over 50 years at Wicken Fen.
In its nonnative range, common buckthorn's successional role varies among plant communities and depends on the disturbance history of a given site. Its ability to establish and persist in low-light environments such as a deciduous forest understory suggests that it may occur in these communities during mid- to late-successional stages. However, it may be limited to forests where the native species are less adapted to such conditions or to canopy gaps. For example, invasive populations of common buckthorn often occur in the understory of oak forests that were maintained as oak savannas before fire exclusion began (e.g., [83,131,164,243]), but it rarely establishes in the understories of naturally occurring sugar maple forests, except in canopy gaps such as those occurring along walking trails (e.g., [144]) or following other types of disturbance (e.g., [44,140,246]). Common buckthorn also commonly establishes and persists in abandoned agricultural fields (e.g., [37,103,144,208]), especially former pastures (e.g., [17,193,208]).
The ability of common buckthorn to both tolerate shady conditions and grow quickly in open conditions may give it a successional advantage when canopy gaps are created in areas where it occurs in the understory [116]. Common buckthorn was the most responsive to light among 4 shade-tolerant, woody species tested in Europe [80]. In open woods in eastern Ontario, thousands of small common buckthorn saplings and seedlings covered the ground in shaded locations, and common buckthorn trees and large shrubs occurred in openings. When large common buckthorns were removed, small common buckthorn plants grew rapidly, forming a solid stand [160,175]. Three years after thinning treatments in pine plantations in the Oak Openings Preserve in northwestern Ohio, common buckthorn occurred in 10% of control plots and 36% of thinned plots. Common buckthorn cover and frequency increased after thinning, and common buckthorn and sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella) were the most important nonnatives on thinned plots [1].
Oak savannas and forests: Much of the following information on succession and fire regimes in oak savannas was compiled from literature reviews in several papers: [4,22,23,24,113,125,131]. See Habitat Types and Plant Communities: Savanna for examples of savanna community composition.
Historical descriptions [23] and fire scars on old savanna oaks [83] suggest that savannas in the central United States were maintained by frequent fires, often set by humans [4,22,23,24,125,131]. See FIRE REGIMES for more details. Frequent fires and moisture gradients resulted in communities ranging from xeric prairies, to savannas with an open understory, to relatively open oak woods, to shady, mesic stands dominated by maples [131]. The boundaries among these communities were neither discrete nor stationary but changed in response to climate fluctuations and the frequency and intensity of fires [113].With postsettlement fire exclusion, some savannas succeeded to oak forests, sometimes with dense understories, as oak sprouts grew into oak trees (e.g., [23,59,113]), and native and nonnative woody species established, spread, and interfered with native savanna plants [4,5,83,125,131]. Common buckthorn was introduced to this landscape around the same time that fire exclusion began, as birds dispersed its seeds into a niche that was not suitable for native savanna species that were adapted to the frequent-fire regime [131]. Common buckthorn is now a common component in the understory of some oak forests and savannas [83,113,131]. It is often concentrated along edges of eastern oak forests that were forested at the time it was introduced, whereas some oak forests that originated as woodlands or savannas have common buckthorn throughout [59]. This suggests that common buckthorn established when the canopies were more open and has persisted as the canopies became more dense. While it has been suggested that fire exclusion along the prairie-forest border may increase common buckthorn invasion of prairies (e.g., Leitner 1984 personal communication cited by [36]), the limited success of common buckthorn in light, dry microsites within bur oak communities suggests that common buckthorn is not a pioneer species in fire-excluded prairies. However, it might establish after other pioneer woody species establish and provide some shade [243] and perches for bird dispersers [144].
According to Leitner [131], the most prevalent forms of anthropogenic disturbance in southern Wisconsin oak woodlots after the cessation of frequent fires were cattle grazing and timber cutting. Selective feeding by cows was thought to eliminate seedlings of desirable species such as maples, ashes, and basswoods while leaving the undesirable species such as hawthorns, barberries, and prickly-ashes. When cows were removed, the browse-resistant species had an initial advantage. While common buckthorn bears thorns, these seem to confer little protection from browsing, and common buckthorn was practically absent from the most heavily grazed oak woodlands studied in southeastern Wisconsin. However, common buckthorn can establish and spread in the openings created by browsing when cows are removed. A thick, sometimes impenetrable shrub layer developed in many of these woodlands following the cessation of grazing and fire. Over 50% of the stands in this study had shrub densities exceeding 10,000 shrubs/ha, with a high of 19,400 shrubs/ha, composed of native species such as gray dogwood and viburnum, nonnative species such as common buckthorn and honeysuckles, and survivors from the grazing period [131].
Several studies note dense and abundant common buckthorn populations in bur oak communities (e.g., [83,131,243]). Leitner's study of common buckthorn in 28 upland, oak-dominated woodlots in southeastern Wisconsin suggests that the bur oak savanna presents the ideal set of conditions for common buckthorn invasion and growth. However, the abundance of mesic species in the understory of all but the most xeric sites suggests that with continued exclusion of fire these communities may succeed to more mesic communities. These woodlots were never clearcut, so common buckthorn could not have been part of the pioneering vegetation on these sites, but instead invaded established forest or savanna [131]. Oak savanna remnants with canopy intercept of 40% to 70% may have been the vegetation types most vulnerable to common buckthorn invasion [4]. Field observations of 24 oak woods in northern Indiana and Illinois, and southern Wisconsin found common buckthorn was most common in tallgrass savanna dominated by bur oak, but also occurred in mesic savanna dominated by white oak and northern red oak. Fire exclusion from mesic savanna leads to increased abundace of sugar maple, red maple, and other hardwood species [83]. In several of the study areas surveyed in 1986, canopy oaks were nearly gone, oak seedling regeneration was poor to absent, and a dense understory of 16- to 26-foot (5-8 m) buckthorn shaded virtually bare ground [4]. In xeric, bur oak woodlots, common buckthorn produced denser shade than that of the surrounding forest matrix. Increased shade under common buckthorn may further reduce oak regeneration, reduce cover of native spring ephemerals, and favor more shade-tolerant tree species as succession proceeds [131]. See Influence on succession and plant community dynamics.
If oak forest and savanna sites are subjected to additional disturbances that open the canopy, such as fragmentation resulting from urbanization or logging operations, increased edge habitat and light penetration and simplified stand structure may result in a more xeric microclimate and favor continued dominance of common buckthorn [131].
Maple-beech, riparian, and coniferous ecosystems: Common buckthorn is less likely to establish in maple-beech and coniferous ecosystems than in oak-dominated ecosystems, and it seems to require some type of canopy-opening disturbance to establish. Once it has established, additional canopy disturbance may lead to increased growth and abundance of common buckthorn.
In Syracuse, New York, common buckthorn occurred in 78% of regenerated urban forest patches (had no canopy cover in 1939, but had canopy cover in 1978) and 100% of remnant urban forest patches (had canopy cover in both 1939 and 1978 aerial photos). In regenerated forest patches, it was sometimes dominant in communities characterized by sugar maple, Norway maple, or boxelder. In remnant forest patches, it had significantly greater average stem density and basal area in black oak communities (330 stems/ha and 0.58 m²/ha, respectively) than in sugar maple communities (70.7 stems/ha and 0.11 m²/ha) (P<0.05). The authors suggest that as gaps are formed in black oak canopies, common buckthorn can colonize available sites due to lack of oak regeneration in the absence of fire. Sugar maple, on the other hand, can establish beneath its own canopy, thus limiting recruitment sites for other species such as common buckthorn [246].
Results of studies in central New York suggest canopy openings or edges are important for common buckthorn establishment. Common buckthorn seed dispersal was lowest, seed predation highest, and seedling survival lowest in closed-canopy maple forests compared to plantations and old fields. A combination of low dispersal by frugivores, low seed survival due to predation, and low seedling survival due to dim light apparently prevents common buckthorn from invading intact maple forests [143]. These maple forests were free of anthropogenic disturbances for a century or more and had relatively intact canopies. The small populations of common buckthorn observed in these habitats were associated with walking trails and the canopy openings created by these trails. Disturbances that cause the opening of intact, closed-canopy forests in the Northeast will likely promote invasion by common buckthorn, as long as seed sources are nearby. Once common buckthorn is established, mature plants can serve as points of recruitment for new seedlings [144]. Common buckthorn occurred at the edge of a riparian forest along Little Otter Creek, a slow-moving stream in Vermont that floods each spring into the riparian forest to distances of about 328 feet (100 m) from the stream edge. Common buckthorn occurred in shrub-dominated plots 16 to 82 feet (5-25 m) from the stream edge; it did not occur in the forest understory plots 164 to 328 feet (50-100 m) from the stream edge [105].
Several studies provide examples of common buckthorn establishment following canopy-opening disturbances. Common buckthorn did not occur in an eastern white pine forest in Cedar Creek Natural History Area, east-central Minnesota, before or 2 weeks after a July 1983 storm that resulted in widespread windthrow with substantial tree mortality. However, 10 years later (1993) common buckthorn stems >1 inch (2.5 cm) DBH had a basal area of 0.01 m²/ha and a density of 6.6 individuals/ha; in 1997, basal area was still 0.01 m²/ha but density had increased to 9.9 individuals/ha [7]. In Ottawa, Ontario, common buckthorn was rare in maple-beech forest interior plots prior to an ice storm in January 1998, but it was abundant in the 4 years following the canopy-opening disturbance [44]. Common buckthorn seedling density was lower in undisturbed control plots than in treefall gaps created by severe windstorms in a mixed oak-Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana) forest in northern Virginia in July 1990. Although differences were not significant, common buckthorn averaged 347 seedlings/ha in gap plots and 55 seedlings/ha in control plots [163]. One common buckthorn stem, <6 inches (15 cm) DBH, was recorded in an American elm swamp where the elms had been killed by Dutch elm disease. It was not recorded in 2 similar swamps in the area [9]. Common buckthorn was recorded after flooding ceased in a green ash-red maple forest that had been flooded for waterfowl Habitat management at Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge, central New York. It occurred in the ground layer 2 years after cessation of flooding and in the shrub layer 18 years after flood cessation. Densities of some native shrub species, green ash saplings, and overstory American elm were reduced during the same period, likely providing the openings for common buckthorn establishment. Common buckthorn was not mentioned as occurring in the control site (a swamp) [46].
Common buckthorn occurs in a variety of anthropogenically impacted and disturbed forests. It occurs in urban forests throughout its distribution in Canada [45,154,175,226], in the Great Lakes area (e.g., [74,97,133]) including Minnesota (e.g., [100,157,243]), and further east (e.g., [246]). Populations in urban forests can act as propagule sources for spread into wildlands and nature preserves. In central and western Massachusetts, common buckthorn was among several species associated with high-intensity tree harvest and not with low-intensity tree harvest in 4 forest types (mixed-hardwood, oak, eastern hemlock, and white pine forests). No comparison was made to unharvested forests [147]. Common buckthorn occurred in 8.1% of 148 randomly selected forest sites that had been harvested between 1984 and 2003. Though it was typically rare (1 individual) or uncommon (2-10 individuals) in these sites, it was common (>10 individuals) in 17% of invaded plots. Common buckthorn occurred most often on sites that were formerly plowed, and less often on former pastures or continuously forested woodlots [146]. Study results suggest that regional patterns of invasive species distribution are affected not only by disturbance but also by soil characteristics and "the current and historical landscape context" [146,147].
A comparison of historical data from a 1950 survey of floodplain forest vegetation on the Lower Wisconsin River [41] to data collected there in summer of 2001 [82] suggests that these forests are shifting to a later successional stage that is outside the historical range of variation. In the 1950s, floodplain forests in southern Wisconsin were typically colonized by black willow and eastern cottonwood on recently scoured or deposited substrates. River birch and swamp white oak (Quercus bicolor) were early-successional species in forest gaps. These communities typically succeeded to dominance by American elm, green ash, and silver maple, with a sparse woody understory. In the past, it was thought that regular flooding would typically prevent succession beyond this stage. Since the 1950s, however, the interaction of river regulation, elm mortality, increased browsing pressure from white-tailed deer, timber harvest, and invasive species establishment has led to changes in floodplain forest vegetation. The understories of 3 of the 5 study sites surveyed in 2001 were dominated by 2 invasive species: common prickly-ash and common buckthorn. Both species are thought to have established and spread in canopy gaps resulting from timber harvest and Dutch elm disease. Neither of these species is considered particularly flood tolerant, nor are they particularly palatable to white-tailed deer due to their thorns. Common buckthorn had the highest importance value of all understory species at Ferry Bluff, which is 1 of 2 sites that apparently experienced greater vegetation removal since the 1950 sampling. Common buckthorn was not recorded on this site in 1950 [82].
Mascaro and Schnitzer [140] found evidence that common buckthorn may attain its highest dominance in forests when it establishes prior to afforestation, then persists as forests develop. No examples were found of common buckthorn becoming a canopy dominant when colonizing intact, closed-canopy forest [140]. Eight forested sites where common buckthorn was a dominant species were studied in southern Wisconsin. The 3 mesic sites in this study—where common buckthorn ranks 1st or 2nd by basal area—were largely open areas in 1963. The 3 floodplain sites—where common buckthorn dominates the subcanopy—were completely forested in 1963, probably by native trees. The 2 swamp sites—which have the largest common buckthorn individuals encountered (>12 inches (30 cm) DBH)—were closed-canopy forest in 1963, probably with some common buckthorn present [140].
Site type, land cover history (as determined by inspection of aerial photography, or in the field for 2004), basal area of living stems, and generalized composition of dominant species on 8 forested study sites where common buckthorn was a dominant species in southern Wisconsin [140] Site type* and # Land cover history by year** Basal areaOld-field succession: Former agricultural fields throughout the eastern United States are undergoing succession to forest. No generalized pattern of old-field succession exists because of variability in agricultural use (e.g., cultivation, pasture), potential seed sources, and high variability in site conditions (review by [37]). Common buckthorn occurs on many former agricultural sites at various stages of succession (see below). As old fields in northeastern temperate forests undergo afforestation, there is potential for common buckthorn to become dominant in the plant community, alter successional trajectories, and have other adverse impacts on the invaded community [140].
Common buckthorn may establish in early succession after field abandonment. A study of seedling establishment suggests that common buckthorn establishes and persists better in open microsites than in those with herbaceous cover [65]. However, observations by Whitford and Whitford [236] suggest that dense, ungrazed bluegrass (Poa spp.) sod does not prevent establishment of common buckthorn. Common buckthorn and other woody species occurred as small and suppressed individuals beneath the herb canopy in a field in London, Ontario, that was mown yearly for at least 35 years until 2001. After annual mowing ceased, common buckthorn dominated the shrub layer within 5 years, and female trees produced large seed crops in 2006 (Cavers personal observations cited by [175]).
Some authors have suggested that common buckthorn does not establish in early old-field succession because these fields lack perches to aid in common buckthorn seed dispersal by birds [57]. In southwestern Michigan old fields, common buckthorn established 6 years after field abandonment. Common buckthorn stem density was 0.17 stem/200 m² in year 6 and 3.17 stems/200 m² the following year. The authors noted that at this time other woody species, especially staghorn sumac, had established and provided bird perches [57]. However, other authors observed common buckthorn establishment in fields without perches [236].
Many old fields in central and western New York have a similar land use history: a century of dairy farming followed by abandonment beginning during the 1930s. Similarities in old-field succession may be expected on these sites (Stanton and Bills 1996 as cited by [37]). In a chronosequence study of old fields in western New York, common buckthorn was dominant in early to middle succession but decreased in importance 70 years after abandonment. Common buckthorn averaged 20.3% cover and was among the dominant species on old fields 30 years after abandonment. Fifty years after abandonment, common buckthorn averaged 39.4% cover. On old fields in later succession (70 years after abandonment), common buckthorn averaged only 0.6% cover [37]. Common buckthorn population dynamics in old fields and abandoned plantations in central New York were studied by McCay and others [143,144,145]. Old fields were abandoned 10 to 30 years prior to the study; they had a dense cover of grasses and forbs and sparse cover of shrubs and small trees, of which common buckthorn was among the most abundant. The conifer plantations were planted 35 to 45 years prior and had not been thinned; before planting, they were in agricultural land use. Plantations had many canopy gaps and an "overwhelming number of buckthorn" [143]. Common buckthorn populations in plantations were larger, more evenly distributed, and more mature than populations in old fields or maple-beech forests in this landscape [144]. Common buckthorn is not a universal dominant in abandoned agricultural land, however. Of 483 mesic, abandoned pasture plots surveyed in the Bristol Hills in central New York, common buckthorn dominated 3 plots where quaking aspen and black cherry had high importance values. The author speculated that common buckthorn would eventually be replaced by quaking aspen and black cherry on these sites. Common buckthorn also occurred with hawthorn in shrub-dominated areas on mesic and dry-mesic fields. Most common buckthorn and hawthorn on these sites were in poor condition and shaded by eastern white pine, suggesting eventual replacement of these shrubs by eastern white pine [193].
A study of old-field succession comparing sites that were historically in pasture to those that were historically in cropland in Tompkins County, central New York, found that common buckthorn was more common in abandoned pastures than in abandoned cropland. Common buckthorn was among the most common species in the tree and shrub layer on former pasture sites, occurring in 4 of the 12 sites and contributing ≥20% of the basal area on 1 of those sites; it occurred on only 1 of the former crop sites. Common buckthorn occurred in the ground layer on 10 of the 12 pasture sites and on 5 of the 9 crop sites. The authors suggest that common buckthorn persisted on pasture sites because it is not commonly browsed by livestock (but see next paragraph). Crop sites ranged in age from 12 to about 40 years since abandonment; pasture sites were similar in age with the exception of 2 younger sites (age not given) [208]. A study of 36 farmlands abandoned in the 1970s in southwestern Quebec reveals 2 ecological groups: one comprised of former pasturelands and dominated by spiny shrub vegetation, including common buckthorn, and the other comprised of formerly cultivated fields dominated by either hydric herbs or shrubs. It is not clear whether common buckthorn occurred in the latter ecological group, but it was not among the dominant species. Differences in common buckthorn occurrence and plant community composition between sites was associated not only with land-use history and time since abandonment, but also with abiotic variables (e.g., slope, surface stoniness, drainage), which in turn influence how a parcel of land was most likely used [17].
Despite its common occurrence on abandoned pastureland, some authors indicate that common buckthorn is subject to browsing pressure by livestock and wildlife (e.g., [131,236]), and removal of browsing pressure may increase its importance. Observations in a small permanent pasture in Wisconsin with a history of use by both cattle and white-tailed deer suggest that common buckthorn establishment and persistence may have been facilitated by eastern redcedar acting as a nurse plant and protecting common buckthorn from browsing. Apparently common buckthorn was more palatable to browsers than eastern redcedar. Only the youngest tips of the eastern redcedars were browsed, and the common buckthorn seedlings were able to establish within the dense older growth of these eastern redcedars. Near the middle of each clump, the topmost buds of common buckthorn eventually grew above the reach of browsers and spread into normal crowns, overtopping the eastern redcedars. All common buckthorn individuals had been repeatedly browsed on all branches <4 feet (1.3 m) above the ground, such that remaining branches at that level were very short and densely branched. No other common buckthorn were found in this pasture except 2 individuals that were protected against rocks but were severely browsed and greatly suppressed [236].
Common buckthorn appears to be most abundant in midsuccessional old fields but may persist in later stages of succession on some sites. In a chronosequence study of old field succession in southwestern Ohio, common buckthorn did not occur in 2-year-old, 10-year-old, 90-year-old or 200+-year-old stands. It was present but not common (importance percentage or relative cover ≥5%) in 50-year-old stands dominated by goldenrod and with canopy tree cover of about 30% [222]. A 22-site chronosequence was used to study upland old-field succession in southeastern New Hampshire. Five woody community types were identified ranging from recently abandoned fields to eastern hemlock forests greater than 200 years old. Common buckthorn occurred at low densities in the tall shrub stratum in all types, with the highest relative importance values (<5%) in early- and midsuccessional types. Common buckthorn also occurred in the herb stratum in early-successional and midsuccessional community types [103].
Influence on succession and plant community dynamics: Persistence and spread of common buckthorn in native plant communities may alter plant community composition, stand structure, and successional trajectories in invaded communities. Hobbs [100] suggests that if invasive populations of common buckthorn suppress native tree regeneration, succession may tend toward a more open canopy; whereas, if tree regeneration is not suppressed, succession may lead to a more closed canopy and an eventual loss of common buckthorn. However, it is unclear how long common buckthorn can persist under a closed canopy, and observations of other authors (e.g., [6,74,120,131,140,158,226,243]) suggest that it tolerates substantial shading. Research in Chicago-area oak woodlands [95,96,97] and the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [137] showed altered soil properties under common buckthorn such as changes in soil chemistry, nutrient composition and cycling, and soil fauna and microbial communities, which are likely to impact plant community succession on invaded sites. These changes may have a "legacy effect" that impedes native plant establishment even after common buckthorn is removed [93].
Patches of common buckthorn likely interfere with the establishment and persistence of native shrubs, herbs, and tree seedlings. Alsum [3] found differences in woody species composition between invaded and uninvaded sites along the Lower Wisconsin River. Sites where common buckthorn was present also had higher density of woody seedlings (including common buckthorn), lower herbaceous cover, more weedy and nonnative species, fewer sensitive native plant species, lower density of several native woody species, and greater density of invasive honeysuckles than sites without common buckthorn [3]. While largely anecdotal, several other authors note impacts on native species in communities invaded by common buckthorn [20,31,59,74,90,131,144,232]. Observations by Gourley [74] in Wisconsin indicate that thickets of native shrubs generally had an herbaceous ground layer, whereas thickets of common buckthorn did not. She suggests that because common buckthorn leafs out early and retains leaves late in the season (see Phenological niche separation), there are no seasonal light fluctuations that would allow the germination and survival of tree seedlings, spring ephemerals, and understory shrubs [74]. Where common buckthorn occurs in wetlands, the understory tends to be completely devoid of any other vegetation. It is possible that dense common buckthorn shades out the understory or that white-tailed deer, which tend to congregate in these areas, impede vegetation growth. Areas within the wetland that contain the greatest common buckthorn seedling growth are usually the areas where the typical grass and sedge matrix is absent [74]. Catling and Brownell [31] examined 63 alvar sites in the Great Lakes region that had relatively high native plant diversity. Common buckthorn was especially common among invasive shrub species on the Napanee and Smith Falls plains, where it "has reduced native herbaceous flora" [31].
Dense shade under patches of common buckthorn may interfere with native plants [131,164]. Removal of common buckthorn from Chicago-area oak woodlands resulted in an increase of more than 10% in the openness of the canopy, measured at 5 feet (1.5 m) above the floor (Heneghan and Umek in prep cited by [93]). Packard [164] describes areas in Illinois that were dominated by tallgrass oak savanna in presettlement times and dominated by "an unbroken sea of buckthorn" in the early 1970s. Native plants were lacking and bare dirt was common under the buckthorn [164]. Measurements in oak woodlands at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum showed that light penetration was consistently lower under common buckthorn than in the surrounding forest matrix. However, decreases in native plant cover were not consistently associated with common buckthorn invasion. While herb cover was consistently lower in common buckthorn plots, differences were not significant. Similarly, numbers of woody seedlings were highly variable and showed no significant differences between plots with and without common buckthorn (P>0.05) [131]. Experimental studies of individual common buckthorn shrubs showed no negative effects on understory plants [118,119].
Areas where common buckthorn has invaded may be impacted by a variety of other disturbances that may also affect native plant populations. Study sites in common buckthorn-invaded oak woodlands in the Chicago area, for example, had "a depauperate herbaceous flora". The authors suggest that this was likely due to a combination of fire exclusion, dense shading from invasive woody species, a history of domestic livestock grazing, and an overabundant white-tailed deer population [97]. Along the Lower Wisconsin River, changes in plant community composition in the latter half of the 20th century may be attributed to changes in the flood regime, as well as death of overstory elms from Dutch elm disease, invasion of common buckthorn, changes in land use, and large populations of white-tailed deer [3]. Differential insect herbivory between native and nonnative species may also contribute to increases in common buckthorn associated with declines in native species abundance. Herbivory on 8 native species averaged 4.3% of leaf area lost, significantly more than the 0.8% loss to herbivory on common buckthorn [93].
Evidence of a synergy between common buckthorn and nonnative invasive earthworms, in which each invasive species positively reinforces the population of the other, has been observed in oak woodlands in the Chicago area [92,97] and at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [137]. Nonnative invasive earthworms were most abundant and had the greatest biomass in subcommunities dominated by common buckthorn compared to those dominated by white oak, northern red oak, or sugar maple [97]. Earthworm populations are responsible for a very rapid incorporation of forest floor material into the soil [58], and earthworms showed a preference for common buckthorn litter in a decomposition experiment [92,97]. As keystone detritivores, invasive earthworms can change seedbed conditions, soil characteristics, plant-herbivore interactions, and flow of water, nutrients, and carbon ([58], review by [137]). Some earthworm species have been linked to declines in native plant diversity and declines in native soil micro- and mesofauna in northern hardwood forests (review by [137]).
Rapid decomposition of common buckthorn litter by earthworms and soil microbes may alter soil biochemistry in invaded sites. Common buckthorn litter decomposed much faster than litter from the native northern red oak overstory at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum [137] or litter from white oak, northern red oak, or sugar maple in Chicago-area woodlands [92,97]. Common buckthorn litter is high in nitrogen and has a low carbon:nitrogen ratio [95,96]. Soils under common buckthorn patches had higher percentages of nitrogen and carbon, modified nitrogen mineralization rates, elevated pH and gravimetric water content, and modified microbial communities compared to uninvaded parts of the woodland [94,95,96]. It has been suggested that these changes might promote growth of common buckthorn seedlings beneath the canopies of conspecifics [74,116,118], whereas the abundance of herbaceous plants in the genera Aralia, Botrychium, Osmorhiza, Trillium, Uvularia, and Viola can be reduced by invasive earthworm populations [58]. Additionally, loss of forest litter may result in the collapse of invertebrate populations that reside in the litter layer [93]. Because invertebrate populations support a large woodland foodweb that includes mammals and birds, the impacts of common buckthorn and nonnative earthworm invasion on native communities may be extensive [92]. Changes in the litter layer with common buckthorn invasion also impact surface fuel characteristics and may impede the use of prescribed fire for management of invaded communities.
A single removal of common buckthorn from invaded areas sometimes allows for native plant establishment (e.g., [20]). However, common buckthorn typically sprouts after top-kill (see Vegetative regeneration), and its seedlings establish from the soil seed bank in disturbed areas (see Germination and Seedling establishment), so it often reestablishes in areas after control efforts (see Control and Use of prescribed fire as a control agent). Other nonnative species may also establish (e.g., [20]). The positive feedback loop between common buckthorn and nonnative earthworms [97] and other changes in soil properties in invaded areas [92] may facilitate reestablishment of common buckthorn following its removal by cutting, chemical treatment, or prescribed fire [97] and retard restoration efforts [92]. After removal of common buckthorn in Chicago-area oak woodlands, populations of earthworms remained high (Heneghan and Umek personal observations cited by [97]), and common buckthorn reestablished and appeared to grow vigorously [97]. However, an experiment at the University of Wisconsin Arboretum in a mixed-hardwood stand dominated by northern red oak in the overstory and common buckthorn in the understory showed a 63% reduction in earthworm abundance the summer following common buckthorn removal (in September 2003 and spring 2004) compared to plots where no common buckthorn was removed. Common buckthorn aboveground biomass was removed again in the late spring of 2005 and 2006. Earthworm abundance in the common buckthorn removal treatments increased over time after the initial reduction, but it remained significantly lower than in control plots throughout the study period (P<0.10). However, no recruitment of native woody species was observed in any of the removal plots in 2004 or 2006 [137].The scientific name of common buckthorn is Rhamnus cathartica L. (Rhamnaceae) [68,77,111,124,138,184,200,229,230,242,244].
The scientific name of Dahurian buckthorn is Rhamnus davurica Pall. (Rhamnaceae) [56,77,111,138,156,200,228,244].
Two subspecies of Dahurian buckthorn are recognized in North America: R. davurica
subsp. davurica [111,244] and R. davurica subsp. nipponica (Makino) Kartesz & Gandhi [111,138].
In this review, the term "buckthorns" is used when describing information pertaining to the genus (Rhamnus), the species are referred to by their common names, and infrataxa are identified by scientific name.
Hybrids: A review by Kurylo and others [120] notes that the native distributions of nearly 42 Rhamnus species overlap or cooccur in their native range, and that many of these species can hybridize with R. cathartica. In Michigan,
there is evidence of hybridization between common buckthorn and Chinese buckthorn (R. utilis) [64].
Common buckthorn does not reproduce or spread vegetatively, but it does regenerate by sprouting from cut or damaged stems [90] or from the root crown [18] following complete top-kill or partial removal from cutting, browsing, herbicide treatments, or burning [20,45,71,160] (see Control). Seedlings apparently do not sprout following top-kill [20]; however, it is not clear at what age or size common buckthorn seedlings attain the ability to sprout.
According to a review by Solecki [199], all nonnative buckthorns, including Dahurian buckthorn, sprout prolifically from cut or damaged stems. No additional information was available regarding vegetative regeneration in Dahurian buckthorn (as of 2010).
Rhamnus catharticus, el espín cerval o cervispino, tamién conocíu como cambrón, fediondu o ramno catárticu, ye un parrotal espinosu de la familia de les Ramnacees.
Ye un parrotal tupiu de 3-6 metros d'altor. Cañes alternes, diverxentes, terminaes nun escayu. Fueyes opuestes, ovales, caduques y de cantos dentaos con 2-4 pares de nervios llaterales bien marcaos y de color verde brillante de 2-6 cm de llargor. Flores pequeñes y verdoses de cuatro pétalos, abondosos en grupos ente les fueyes. Frutu en baga, negra y redonda del tamañu d'un arbeyu. Son venenoses con golor cheiriento.
Llargamente distribuyíu por toa Europa, noroeste d'África y Asia occidental en montes, sebes y espesures, sobremanera en llugares soleyeros y cascayosos. Introducíu en Norteamérica nel sieglu XIX como ornamental ellí convirtióse en planta invasora.
Rhamnus catharticus describióse por Carlos Linneo y espublizóse en Species Plantarum 1: 193, nel añu 1753.[1]
Rhamnus: nome xenéricu que deriva d'un antiguu nome griegu pal espín cerval.[2]
catharticus: epítetu llatín que significa "purgativo".[3]
Númberu de cromosomes de Rhamnus cathartica (Fam. Rhamnaceae) y táxones infraespecíficos: 2n=24[4]
Esta páxina forma parte del wikiproyeutu Botánica, un esfuerciu collaborativu col fin d'ameyorar y organizar tolos conteníos rellacionaos con esti tema. Visita la páxina d'alderique del proyeutu pa collaborar y facer entrugues o suxerencies. Rhamnus catharticus, el espín cerval o cervispino, tamién conocíu como cambrón, fediondu o ramno catárticu, ye un parrotal espinosu de la familia de les Ramnacees.
Dünyanın bir sıra ölkələrində rast gəlmək mümkündür.
Hündürlüyü 3 m-ə çatan, şaxələnmiş budaqlara malik kol bitkisidir. Cavan zoğların qabığı gümüşü-boz rəngli olub, sonradan qonur-qara rəng alır. Budaqlarının ucları düz tikanlidir. Üzbəüz yarpaqları saplaqlı, yumurtavari və ya ellipsvari, bir az ucu biz, parlaq, üç cüt qövsvari yan damarcıqlıdır, kənarları isə dişlidir. Yarpaqların qoltuqlarında 10-15 ədəd dəstələrlə çətirlərə yığılmış dörd hissəli, yaşılımtıl-sarı çiçəkləri yerləşir. Maydan iyunadək çiçəkləyir. Çiçəklərdən noxud ölçüsündə, əvvəlcə yaşıl, sonra qaralan yumru meyvələr-senokarp çəyirdəklər inkişaf edir. Çəyirdəkləri arxa tərəfdən qabarıq və ön tərəfdən zəif çıxıntılıdır. Zəhərli meyvələrinin çəyirdəkləri hamar-qabarıq, ximircəkli, ikili “dimdiklidir”.
Günəşli, quru yerlərdə, kolluqlarda bataqlıq meşələrdə, rütubətli torpaqlarda, çəpərlərin ətrafında rast gəlinir.
Böyük və Kiçik Qafqaz, Kür-Araz ovalığında və Naxçıvan MR-da təbii halda rast gəlinir.
Dərman və boyayıcı bitkidir. Bütün hissələrində antraqlikozidlər vardır. Balvericidir. Payızın axırlarında yetişmiş və quru meyvələri dərman kimi istifadə edilir.
L'espina vera (Rhamnus cathartica), és una planta de la família de les ramnàcies.[1] Aquesta planta també es coneix amb els noms d'espina cervina, espina santa, arç, cambró o prunelló silvestre.[2] Aquesta planta té propietats laxants i diürètiques, però el seu consum excessiu produeix vòmits i diarrees.
L'espina vera es troba a les zones temperades d'Euràsia, des de les illes Britàniques fins al Kirguizistan.[3] L'hàbitat general d'aquesta planta és la muntanya mitjana, habitualment es troba entre els 800 i els 1.400 m.[4]
L'espina vera es considera una espècie invasora a molts llocs, sobretot als Estats Units.[5]
Aquesta planta és un arbust espinós, dioic i caducifoli. Les fulles són simples i ovades, de color verd i es van tornant grogues cap a la tardor. Les flors són de color groguenca. El fruit de l'espina vera és una baia de color negre, que s'utilitza amb finalitats medicinals.
L'escorça i el fruit tenen propietats purgants. S'utilitzaven antigament a la medicina herbal casolana, però ara ja no es fan servir tant a causa dels efectes purgants massa violents i l'abundància d'efectes secundaris.[6]
Les erugues de la papallona coneguda com a llimonera (Gonepteryx rahmni) viuen de les fulles d'aquesta planta.
L'espina vera (Rhamnus cathartica), és una planta de la família de les ramnàcies. Aquesta planta també es coneix amb els noms d'espina cervina, espina santa, arç, cambró o prunelló silvestre. Aquesta planta té propietats laxants i diürètiques, però el seu consum excessiu produeix vòmits i diarrees.
Coeden fechan blodeuol yw Rhafnwydden rhafnwydd sy'n enw benywaidd. Mae'n perthyn i'r teulu Rhamnaceae. Yr enw gwyddonol (Lladin) yw Rhamnus cathartica a'r enw Saesneg yw Buckthorn.[1] Ceir enwau Cymraeg eraill ar y planhigyn hwn gan gynnwys Rhafnwydden, Draenen y Bwch.
Esblygodd y rhywogaeth hon yn yr epoc Eosen (56 - 33.9 o flynyddoedd CP). Mae'r dail yn syml ac ni rhannwyd llafn y ddeilen yn ddail llai.[2] Mae'r blodau'n rheidiol ac yn gymesur. Ar adegau caiff ei ddefnyddio fel addurn ac mewn gerddi.
Coeden fechan blodeuol yw Rhafnwydden rhafnwydd sy'n enw benywaidd. Mae'n perthyn i'r teulu Rhamnaceae. Yr enw gwyddonol (Lladin) yw Rhamnus cathartica a'r enw Saesneg yw Buckthorn. Ceir enwau Cymraeg eraill ar y planhigyn hwn gan gynnwys Rhafnwydden, Draenen y Bwch.
Esblygodd y rhywogaeth hon yn yr epoc Eosen (56 - 33.9 o flynyddoedd CP). Mae'r dail yn syml ac ni rhannwyd llafn y ddeilen yn ddail llai. Mae'r blodau'n rheidiol ac yn gymesur. Ar adegau caiff ei ddefnyddio fel addurn ac mewn gerddi.
Řešetlák počistivý (Rhamnus cathartica) je keřovitá rostlina z čeledi řešetlákovité (Rhamnaceae), rostoucí v křovinách, na slunných stráních, ve světlých hájích a na okraji lužních lesů od nížin až do podhůří.
Řešetlák je vysoký keř s načernalou kůrou a zpravidla rozestlanými větvemi, řídce posetými trny. Dlouze řapíkaté listy jsou dílem vstřícné, dílem uspořádané do svazečků, ojediněle však i střídavé. Jsou široce eliptické, na čepeli dvakrát pilovité. Drobné zelenavé květy jsou uspořádány do chudých vrcholičnatých svazků a jsou většinou dvoudomé. Plodem je kulatá peckovice, velká jako hrách, která z postupující zralostí zčerná. Kvete ve druhé polovině jara, obyčejně na přelomu května a června.
Nejčastěji se sbírá plod, řidčeji kůra. Plod sbíráme v úplné zralosti, na přelomu září a října. Nejkvalitnější kůrovou drogu poskytuje sběr v jarních měsících, před rozkvětem, nejlépe v březnu a dubnu. Droga je vyhledávána pro svůj obsah antrachinonů a antranolů, jakož i antrachinonových glykosidů a flavonoidů. Dále zde nacházíme sacharidy, pektiny, organické kyseliny – například vitamín C, kyselinu jantarovou, saponiny, hořčiny a pryskyřice. Složení kůry je podobné, ale chudší. Přítomny jsou hlavně antrachinony a antranoly, flavonoidy a třísloviny. Obsahové látky drogy zabezpečují dobrý projímavý účinek, který je mírnější než u krušinové kůry a u listů nebo lusků senny. Droga současně působí mírně močopudně. Je určena k léčbě tzv. atonické zácpy, která je častá u starších nemocných, kde je pokleslý střevní tonus.
Galerie řešetlák počistivý ve Wikimedia Commons Obrázky, zvuky či videa k tématu řešetlák počistivý ve Wikimedia Commons
Řešetlák počistivý (Rhamnus cathartica) je keřovitá rostlina z čeledi řešetlákovité (Rhamnaceae), rostoucí v křovinách, na slunných stráních, ve světlých hájích a na okraji lužních lesů od nížin až do podhůří.
Vrietorn (Rhamnus cathartica) eller Korsved er en op til 10 m høj busk eller træ, der vokser i skovbryn og på overdrev. Hele planten er giftig. Den er mellemvært for Havrens Sortrust. Velegnet til skovbryn og vildtplantninger.
Vrietorn er en stor, løvfældende busk eller et lille træ. Den har først en opret vækst, men senere bliver den overhængende. Hvert skud ender i en aborteret gren, som bliver til en torn. Bladene er ovale og rundtakkede med buede nerver. Oversiden er kraftigt mørkegrøn. Blomsterne er grønne og ses ikke. Den blomstrer i juni, og da planten er særbo, sidder de hanlige blomster samlet på rent hanlige individer og modsat de hunlige. Frugterne er sorte stenfrugter med én kerne.
Rodnettet består af grove, dybtgående hovedrødder og fine, højtliggende siderødder.
Højde x bredde og årlig tilvækst: 8 x 5 m (40 x 25 cm/år).
Planten hører hjemme på leret, mineralrig bund med konstant fugtighed. Tornene og dens giftighed gør, at kreaturer ikke gerne æder den. Derfor findes den ofte på steder som overdrev og skovbryn, hvor dyrenes gnaven har fjernet mere kraftigtvoksende, men spiselige konkurrenter.
I Danmark findes den hist og her på Øerne og i Østjylland i skovbryn, krat og på overdrev.
Planten har ikke træk, der gør den egnet som haveplante. Hvis man skulle have lyst, er de udenlandske arter, og især Kaukasisk Korsved meget smuk i løvet. Vrietorn tåler både vind og skygge, men jordbunden må ikke være for næringsfattig og tør. Trives godt i strandkrat og på kalkrig jord. I øvrigt kan den danske art kræves fjernet, da den er mellemvært for Havrens Sortrust. Velegnet til skovbryn og vildtplantninger.
Vrietorn (Rhamnus cathartica) eller Korsved er en op til 10 m høj busk eller træ, der vokser i skovbryn og på overdrev. Hele planten er giftig. Den er mellemvært for Havrens Sortrust. Velegnet til skovbryn og vildtplantninger.
Der Purgier-Kreuzdorn (Rhamnus cathartica, Syn.: Rhamnus catharticus L.) ist eine Pflanzenart aus der Familie der Kreuzdorngewächse (Rhamnaceae). Sie ist eine in Eurasien und Nordafrika heimische und beispielsweise in Nordamerika invasive Pflanze.
Der Purgier-Kreuzdorn hat auch folgende weitere Trivialnamen: Purgierdorn, Purgierstrauch, Kreuzbeerstrauch, Kreuzdorn, Echter Kreuzdorn, (Echter) Wegedorn, Wegdorn sowie Färbebaum, Feldbeerbaum, Hexendorn, Hirschdorn, Stechdorn. Die Bezeichnung Kreuzdorn kommt von den zuweilen im Kreuz stehenden Zweigen bzw. Dornen, der Name Purgierdorn (purgieren: abführen) von den giftigen Früchten mit ihrer abführenden Wirkung.
Für seine Früchte sind folgende Namen bekannt; Amselbeeren, Gelbbeeren, Schissbeeren, Rainbeeren, Kreuz- und Kreuzdornbeeren.
Der Purgier-Kreuzdorn wächst als sparriger, sommergrüner Strauch und erreicht Wuchshöhen von 3 Metern oder als kleiner Baum bis über 6 Meter, als solcher kann er auch ein Alter von rund 100 Jahren erreichen. Die Rinde des Kreuzdornes ist glatt und weist erst im Alter einige Risse auf. Er besitzt Dornen an den Zweigenden, die ihm seinen deutschen Namen verliehen haben. Die annähernd gegenständig angeordneten, einfachen und kahlen, kurz gestielten Laubblätter weisen eine Länge von 3 bis 7 Zentimeter auf. Die Blätter sind eiförmig bis elliptisch oder rundlich, seltener verkehrt-eiförmig und fein gesägt oder gekerbt sowie bespitzt bis spitz oder rundspitzig, seltener stumpf bis gestutzt oder abgerundet.
Die Blütezeit reicht von Mai bis Juni. Die kleinen und gestielten Blüten bilden sich in achselständigen Büscheln. Der Purgier-Kreuzdorn ist zweihäusig getrenntgeschlechtig (diözisch). In den funktional eingeschlechtlichen Blüten finden sich jeweils Rudimente des anderen Geschlechts, wobei die etwas größeren männlichen Blüten noch verkümmerte Fruchtknotenreste und die weiblichen Blüten noch rudimentäre Staubblätter aufweisen. Die unscheinbaren, grünen Blüten sind radiärsymmetrisch und vierzählig mit doppelter Blütenhülle. Die Petalen sind nur klein und sind an die Staubblätter oder Staminodien gepresst, die größeren, ausladenden Kelchblätter sind schmal-dreieckig. Der vierkammerige Fruchtknoten ist mittelständig mit einem Griffel mit vier Ästen. Die Griffel sind verschieden lang (Heterostylie). Es ist jeweils ein Diskus vorhanden.
Die bei einem Durchmesser von 6 bis 10 Millimeter kugeligen, bei Reife schwarz-violetten, glatten und fleischigen Steinfrüchte enthalten drei bis vier dreikantige, einsamige, eiförmige, etwa 3,5–5 Millimeter lange, knorpelige Steinkerne (Pyrene).
Die Chromosomenzahl beträgt 2n = 24.[1]
Die Blüten sind unscheinbare, „Nektar führende Scheibenblumen“. Der Nektar wird offen von einem Diskus abgegeben. Die Bestäubung erfolgt besonders durch Fliegen und Hautflügler.
Es findet Verdauungsverbreitung durch Vögel statt. Fruchtreife erfolgt von September bis Oktober.
Vegetative Vermehrung erfolgt durch Wurzelsprosse.
Das Verbreitungsgebiet des Purgier-Kreuzdorn umfasst beinahe ganz Europa und erstreckt sich über Nordwestafrika bis nach Westasien.[2]
Der Kreuzdorn ist kalkliebend, ansonsten aber pH-indifferent. Man findet ihn sowohl in Auwäldern, Hecken und Wegrändern als auch an felsigen Hängen. In Deutschland ist er weit verbreitet – vom Norddeutschen Tiefland bis zu den Alpen in Höhenlagen von 1600 Metern.[1] Die bevorzugte Lage ist in der Strauchschicht in einer Höhe bis 800 Meter über dem Meeresspiegel.[3] Er ist in Mitteleuropa eine Berberidion-Verbandscharakterart, kommt aber auch in Gesellschaften der Ordnung Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae vor.[1]
Der Purgier-Kreuzdorn ist ein Zwischenwirt des orangefarbenen Hafer-Kronenrostes (Puccinia coronata), der ein bedeutender Schädling des Getreides und der Futtergräser darstellt. Ferner ist er Nahrungspflanze für die Raupen des Zitronenfalters (Gonepteryx rhamni) und für die des Großen Kreuzdornspanners (Philereme transversata).
Die Früchte verwendet man getrocknet als Abführmittel; hingegen kann der Verzehr von unreifen Früchten – vor allem bei Kindern – zu Vergiftungserscheinungen führen. Der abführenden Wirkung hat der Strauch seinen botanischen Namen cathartica (altgriechisch: katarthikos für reinigend) zu verdanken.
Früher wurde aus den Früchten das „Saftgrün“ der Maler und aus den getrockneten, im Mörser zerkleinerten Beeren als wässriger Auszug ein gelber Farbstoff zum Beizen von Holz (15.–17. Jahrhundert) hergestellt.[4]
Das Holz ist hart und schwer, es eignet sich gut zum Drechseln oder im Möbelbau.
Die Früchte gelten als giftig. Die Rinde ist ebenso giftig für den Menschen.
Der Purgier-Kreuzdorn (Rhamnus cathartica, Syn.: Rhamnus catharticus L.) ist eine Pflanzenart aus der Familie der Kreuzdorngewächse (Rhamnaceae). Sie ist eine in Eurasien und Nordafrika heimische und beispielsweise in Nordamerika invasive Pflanze.
She lus 'sy chynney Rhamnaceae ee bugogue (Rhamnus cathartica). T'ee dooghyssagh da'n Oarpey, yn Affrick heear hwoaie, as yn Aishey heear.[1][2] T'ee ry-akin ayns America Hwoaie myr lus jesheenagh.[3][4]
She crouw yn-lhoamey t'ayn. T'ee gaase wheesh as 8m er yrjid. Ta roost dhone lheeah eck as banglaneyn jialgagh. Ta duillagyn eelipsagh dys oohchrooagh glassey eck, mysh 2.5–9 cm er lheead as 1.2–3.5 cm er yrjid; t'ad maylartey. Ta blaaghyn buighey-ghlassey kiare-petyllagh eck. T'ad dioecious, as t'ad goll er pollnaghey ec shey-chassee. She droop doo eh y mess eck, mysh 6–10 mm er crantessen, as ta daa dys kiare rassinyn ayn. T'eh nieunagh da sleih, agh ta ein ad y ee gyn doilleeid, as skeaylley ny rassinyn 'sy check oc.[5][6]
Ta bugogue gaase dy tappee, agh t'ee neuveayn. T'ee surral scaa dy mie, as t'ee tramylt. T'ee ny lus ruegyssagh as ta'n scaa eck lhiettal aase dooieyn dooghyssagh. S'doillee eh ish y 'reayll fo; t'ee cur magh buinnaghyn dy breeoil erreish jee goll er giarrey ny lossey.[7]
Hug Linnaeus Rhamnus catharticus urree, agh ren ad kerraghey yn ennym myr cathartica er y fa dy nee ennym genus bwoirrinagh ee Rhamnus.[8]
Ren ad ymmyd purgaidagh jeh roost as messyn ny lus traa dy row, agh s'goan shen nish er coontey fo-eiyrtyssyn gaueagh.[9] Ta'n fuygh creoi, agh cha nel monney ymmyd jeant jeh. She lus bee foillycanyn 'sy ghenus Gonepteryx t'ayn, as oltey da noidyn scanshoil troaryn: Puccinia coronata as Aphis glycines.[10]
She lus 'sy chynney Rhamnaceae ee bugogue (Rhamnus cathartica). T'ee dooghyssagh da'n Oarpey, yn Affrick heear hwoaie, as yn Aishey heear. T'ee ry-akin ayns America Hwoaie myr lus jesheenagh.
En Dräidar (Rhamnus cathartica) ass en Trausch aus der Famill vun de Rhamnaceae, deen an Europa, Asien an Afrika doheem ass.
Als Trausch gëtt den Dräidar bis zu 3 Meter an als Beemche bis zu 6 Meter héich, a ka sou bis zu 100 Joer al ginn. En huet Dären, dohier säin Numm. Seng kleng, schwaarz Biere si gëfteg a kënne gedréchent als Laxatif gebraucht ginn. De botaneschen Numm weist doropshin (algrichesch: katarthikos heescht rengegen). Seng geschielt Stiller gi gebraucht fir Drëppen unzemaachen.
Den Henri Klees (1972) nennt fir de Rhamnus cathartica och nach déi heite lëtzebuergesch Nimm: Porjéierdar, Schäissdar (wéinst der purgativer Wierkung vun de Friichten) a Weedar. Si sinn awer kaum nach am Gebrauch.
Zu Iener steet en Dräidar, deen zu de bemierkenswäerte Beem zu Lëtzebuerg gezielt gëtt.
Kuckt duerzou: Dräidar zu Iener.
En Dräidar (Rhamnus cathartica) ass en Trausch aus der Famill vun de Rhamnaceae, deen an Europa, Asien an Afrika doheem ass.
Als Trausch gëtt den Dräidar bis zu 3 Meter an als Beemche bis zu 6 Meter héich, a ka sou bis zu 100 Joer al ginn. En huet Dären, dohier säin Numm. Seng kleng, schwaarz Biere si gëfteg a kënne gedréchent als Laxatif gebraucht ginn. De botaneschen Numm weist doropshin (algrichesch: katarthikos heescht rengegen). Seng geschielt Stiller gi gebraucht fir Drëppen unzemaachen.
Neveidielis, kėtap šonvuobelė (luotīnėškā: Rhamnus cathartica) ī tuokis krūms aba nedėdlis medis.
Neveidielis aug Euruopuo, Sėbėrė, Kaukazė, Vėdorėnie ė Mažuojuo Azėjuo. Ana tonkė vėsuo Lietovuo, aug skīriom kor tās pamedies, krūmīnūs, opiu, ežerū krontūs, švėisiuos medies.
Ana 1-4 m augoma, nuognē šakuots krūms aba medelis ī. Vainėks anuos rotolėškos, žėivie tomsē roda aba jouduoka. Terpošakiūs būn akstėnā. Lapā paėlgi, dontītās kraštās. Vaisios neveidielė ī tuokė jouda, blizgontė ouga.
Naprisėrpė̄ neveidielė vaisē, lapā ė žėivie ī tročīzna. Ėš vaisiu dėrbami dažā, sausintu vaisiu nūvirs ī kap liekvarstos (palaid vėdorius, geramas nug geltuos).
Kap neveidielis žīda, rokoun, rēk sietė rogius.
Pšawy gokowc (Rhamnus cathartica) jo kerk ze swójźby gokowcowych rostlinow (Rhamnaceae).
Pšawy gokowc jo kerk, kótaryž dośěgnjo wusokosć wót 1 až do 3 m. Gałuzy se cesto ze śernjom skóńcyju.
Łopjena su kulowate až šyroko-jajojte a dośěgnu dłujkosć wót 4 až do 6 cm. Wóni njasu na wobyma bokoma 3-4 wobłukate nerwy. Na staršych gałuzach stoje w promjenjach, mjaztym až na młodšych gałuzach su pśeśiwo stojece. Jich kšoma jo śańko rězana.
Łopjenowy wogonk jo dlejše ako pódlańske łopjeńka.
Kwiśo wót maja až do junija. Žołtozelene, wónjate kwiśonki su styrilicbne, dośěgnu šyrokosć wót 4 až do 5 mm a stoje pó dwěma až pó wósymych we łopjenowych rozporach.
Płody su carne jagodojte twardopackate płody, kótarež dośěgnu šyrokosć wót 6 až do 8 mm.
Rosćo w słyńcnych žywych płotach, na lěsnych kšomach, w swětłych lěsach a suchych pastwach.
Rostlina jo w pódpołdnjowej Skandinawiskej, w srjejźnej a pódpołdnjowej Europje rozšyrjona.
Něga bu z płodow zelena barwa zgótowana, kótaraž bu w mólarstwje a k barwjenju papjery a kóže wužywana.
Pšawy gokowc (Rhamnus cathartica) jo kerk ze swójźby gokowcowych rostlinow (Rhamnaceae).
Ангурак, ё олучаи хирсак, ё сиёҳбодом (лот. Rhámnus cathártica) — бутта ё дарахтест худрӯй.
То 8 м қад мекашад. Пӯстлохи танааш сиёҳтоб, навдаҳои наврустааш хокистарии сурхча. Баргаш думчадор, гирда, байзашакл ё дарозрӯя, нӯгтез (дарозиаш 2-8 мм). Гулаш зангӯламонанд (дарозиаш 4—-5 мм), сабзи зардтоб, одатан 10—15-тоӣ аз бари барг мебарояд (моҳҳои май — июн мешукуфад). Мевааш мудаввар (қутраш 0,6-0,8 см), аввал сабз, баъдтар (авг. — сент.) сиёҳи ҷилодор мешавад. Донакаш байзашакл (дарозиаш 5—6 мм), бӯри сиёҳтоб ё қаҳваранг.
Ангурак, одатан, дар ҷангалзори гармсер ва паҳнбарг, туғайзор, канори сою дарёҳо (қаторкӯҳҳои Қурама, Дарвозу Ҳисор, мавзеъҳои воҳаи д. Сир, ҷан. Тоҷикистон; 1000—1700 м баландтар аз с. б.) нумӯ меёбад. Бештар ҳамроҳи фарк, санҷид, дӯлона, бед, тилох ва ғ. месабзад. Дарахти беор аст. Ба осонӣ зиёд мешавад.
Табибони халқӣ бо ҷӯшоби шохчаву пӯстлохи А. захми меъда ва қабзияти меъдаву рӯдаро табобат мекунанд. «Чой»-и меваи хушкашро (1 қошуқ дар 200 мл оби ҷӯш, ки ним истакон пеш аз хоб менӯшанд) доруи исҳоловар меҳисобанд. Дар тибби муосир мева ва пӯстлохаш чун воситаи исҳоловар истифода мешавад. Аз пӯстлохаш «франгин» ном доруе мегиранд, ки ба қабзияти кӯҳна давост.
Пештар бо меваи ангурак матои пахтагӣ ва шоҳиро ранг (сабз, зард, сурх) мекарданд. Аангурак рустании ороишӣ ва доруист. Онро дар соҳили дарёҳои Тоҷикистони Марказӣ ва Шимолӣ (дар баландиҳои то 1700 м аз с. б.) парваридан мувофиқи мақсад аст; одатан ниҳолҳои 2—3-соларо кӯчат мекунанд.
Бгырыпхиӏэ (лат-бз. Rhamnus cathartica) — жыг цӏыкӏущ, бгырыпхиӏэ лъэпкъэгъум щыщщ.
И лъэгагъыр м. 5-8-м нос. И пхъафэр щхъуафэщ, щхъуафэ-фӏыцӏафэщ. Жыгыпкъым тет къудамэхэмрэ къудамэхэм ятет тхьэмпэ хъурей кӏыхьхэмрэ зэпэщӏэтщ. Гъэгъа фагъуэ-щхъуэнтӏафэхэр тхьэмпэхэмрэ къудамэ цӏыкӏухэмрэ я зэхуакум, ӏэрамэ цӏыкӏухэу гъатхэм икӏэм щыщӏэдзауэ бадзэуэгъуэм нэс ирихьэлӏэу къыпедзэ.
Пхъэщхьэмыщхьэ къыпыкӏэхэр хъурей цӏыкӏухэщ, хъуа нэуж, фӏыцӏафэщ.
Мэз лъапэхэм, чыцэхэм къыщокӏ. Паркхэм, мэз ӏэрысэхэм щыхасэ.
Адыгэхэм, абазэхэм жыг пхъафэм, пхъэщхьэмыщхьэхэм иӏэгъэ зэмылӏэужьыгъуэхэр къыхах.
Хьэкъун Б. Адыгэ къэкӀыгъэцӀэхэр. ТхылътедзапӀэ «Элбрус». Налшыч 1992 гъ.
Бизнега чувто[1], лиякс: лавшомтыця верьгизэнь сельме[2], бизнэга чувто[3] (лат. Rhámnus cathártica, руз. Круши́на слаби́тельная, или Жо́стер слабительный) — ламо иень перть касыця куро али аволь покш чувто. Верьгизэнь сельме (Rhamnus) буестэ (Rhamnáceae) семиясто.
Керезэ раужо. Тарадонзо прядовить пупиця салмукссо. Цецянзо пижелат. Марензэ пецезь нетьксэнтень, потсонзо кевнень кондямо видьме. Кассы вирь чирева, лей чиресэ. Ловови ормадо лезэв чувтокс. Надобиякс молить керезэ, ягоданзо-марензэ — сынст эйстэ теить артомапель, сон арты кеденть ожосто.
Цецятнестэ мекштне саить медярво, медесь ожо, а сахарыи[4].
Ботаникань артовкс «Köhler’s Medizinal-Pflanzen» книгасто, 1887
Бизнега чувто, лиякс: лавшомтыця верьгизэнь сельме, бизнэга чувто (лат. Rhámnus cathártica, руз. Круши́на слаби́тельная, или Жо́стер слабительный) — ламо иень перть касыця куро али аволь покш чувто. Верьгизэнь сельме (Rhamnus) буестэ (Rhamnáceae) семиясто.
Керезэ раужо. Тарадонзо прядовить пупиця салмукссо. Цецянзо пижелат. Марензэ пецезь нетьксэнтень, потсонзо кевнень кондямо видьме. Кассы вирь чирева, лей чиресэ. Ловови ормадо лезэв чувтокс. Надобиякс молить керезэ, ягоданзо-марензэ — сынст эйстэ теить артомапель, сон арты кеденть ожосто.
Цецятнестэ мекштне саить медярво, медесь ожо, а сахарыи.
Хура катăркас , (лат. Rhamnus cathartica), — йыт çĕмĕрт йышне кĕрекен 3 м таран ӳсекен тĕм.
Чечек формули: 
∗ K ( 4 ) C 4 A 4 G 0 {displaystyle ast K_{(4)};C_{4};A_{4};G_{0}} 
∗ K ( 4 ) C 4 A 0 G ( 4 _ ) {displaystyle ast K_{(4)};C_{4};A_{0};G_{({underline {4}})}} 
Чечекĕсенчен малтан симĕс, кайран хуралакан пăрçа пысăккăш çимĕçĕсем аталанаççĕ.
Сиплĕ ӳсентăран [2]. Вĕлле хурчĕсем пыл пуçтараççĕ. Йывăç айĕнчи нӳрлĕ вырăнсенче нектар шайĕ пысăкланать. Пылĕ сарă тĕслĕ, сахăрланмасть [3]. Типĕ хупине хăмăр тĕслĕ сăрă тума юрăхлă [4], чĕре хупинчен çутă сарă, пиçмен çмĕçĕсенчен сарă, пиçнĕ çырлисенчен симĕс тата хĕрлĕ тĕслĕ сăрă тума пулать [5]
Чечек формули: ∗ K ( 4 ) C 4 A 4 G 0 {displaystyle ast K_{(4)};C_{4};A_{4};G_{0}} ∗ K ( 4 ) C 4 A 0 G ( 4 _ ) {displaystyle ast K_{(4)};C_{4};A_{0};G_{({underline {4}})}}
Чечекĕсенчен малтан симĕс, кайран хуралакан пăрçа пысăккăш çимĕçĕсем аталанаççĕ.
Rhamnus cathartica, the European buckthorn,[3] common buckthorn, purging buckthorn, or just buckthorn, is a species of small tree in the flowering plant family Rhamnaceae. It is native to Europe, northwest Africa and western Asia, from the central British Isles south to Morocco, and east to Kyrgyzstan.[4][5] It was introduced to North America as an ornamental shrub in the early 19th century or perhaps before, and is now naturalized in the northern half of the continent, and is classified as an invasive plant in several US states[6][7][8] and in Ontario, Canada.[9]
Rhamnus cathartica is a deciduous, dioecious shrub or small tree growing up to 10 metres (33 ft) tall, with grey-brown bark and often thorny branches. The leaves are elliptic to oval, 25–90 mm (1–3+1⁄2 in) long and 12–35 mm (1⁄2–1+3⁄8 in) broad; they are green, turning yellow in autumn, and are arranged somewhat variably in opposite to subopposite pairs or alternately. The flowers are yellowish-green, with four petals; they are dioecious and insect pollinated. The fruit is a globose black drupe, 6–10 mm (1⁄4–3⁄8 in) across, and contains two to four seeds.
The species was originally named by Carl Linnaeus as Rhamnus catharticus, but this spelling was corrected to cathartica as the genus name Rhamnus is treated as being of feminine gender.[10]
The seeds and leaves are mildly poisonous for humans and most other animals, but are readily eaten by birds, who disperse the seeds in their droppings.[11][12] The toxins cause stomach cramps and laxative effects that may function in seed dispersal. The chemical compounds responsible for this laxative effect are anthraquinone[13] and emodin. The species name cathartica and the common name purging buckthorn refer to this effect.
In 1994, R. cathartica was implicated in the outbreak of an idiopathic neurological disease in horses, although no causative agent was officially identified. In trials where rodents were fed the leaves and stems of R. cathartica, glycogen metabolism became abnormal and glycogen deposits formed in the cytoplasm of liver cells. Abnormalities in glycogen metabolism lead to diabetes in humans.[14]
Rhamnus cathartica is shade-tolerant, moderately fast-growing and short-lived. It is a food plant of the brimstone butterfly, Gonepteryx rhamni. The sulphur-yellow males are indicative of the presence of this species or of its alternative host, Frangula alnus.
Rhamnus cathartica is the alternate host for the rust disease of cereals caused by Puccinia coronata. Crown rust fungus results in leaf damage and reductions in photosynthesis during its transit in this species.[15] Rhamnus cathartica is also the primary overwintering host in North America for a significant agricultural pest of soybeans, the soybean aphid.[16]
Secondary compounds, particularly emodin, have been found in the fruit, leaves, and bark of the plant, and may protect it from insects, herbivores and pathogens.[17] The emodin present in R. cathartica fruit may prevent early consumption, as it is found most in unripe fruits, which allows seeds to reach maturity before being dispersed. Birds and mice significantly avoid eating unripe fruits, and if forced to ingest emodin or unripe fruit, the animals regurgitate the meal or produce loose, watery stools.[17] Rhamnus cathartica is a constitutive isoprene emitter [18]
Allelopathic effects of exudates from R. cathartica leaf litter, roots, bark, leaves and fruit may reduce germination of other plant species in the soil. Soils in buckthorn-dominated areas are higher in nitrogen and carbon than normal soils, which speeds up decomposition rates of leaf litter.[19] This can result in bare patches of soil being formed and R. cathartica performs well in such disturbed habitats, so this may be adaptive for the setting of its seed.[17]
The species is naturalised and invasive in parts of North America.[5][17][20] Rhamnus cathartica has a competitive advantage over native trees and shrubs in North America because of root competition, the shade it produces,[21] and it leafs out before native species.[22] Of the annual carbon gain in R. cathartica, 27–35% comes from photosynthesis occurring before the leaves of other plants emerge.[13] Soil in woodlands dominated by R. cathartica was higher in nitrogen, pH and water content than soil in woodlands relatively free of R. cathartica,[19][23] probably because R. cathartica has high levels of nitrogen in its leaves [24] and these leaves decompose rapidly.
Rhamnus cathartica is also associated with invasive European earthworms (Lumbricus spp.) in the northern Midwest of North America.[25] Removing R. cathartica led to a decrease of around 50% in the biomass of invasive earthworms.[26]
Soils enriched by extra nitrogen from decayed buckthorn leaves and additional earthworm activity have a negative impact on North American forest ecosystems: "Invasive earthworms, which need rich litter, break [buckthorn leaves] down rapidly, destroying beneficial fungi and exposing bare soils in the process. These soils provide ideal conditions for buckthorn germination and seedling growth but many native trees and shrubs need the beneficial fungi and will not reproduce without it."[24]
Common buckthorn can be found in most northern states of the United States and it is particularly prevalent in the Great Lakes states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. A current map of its distribution can be found at Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System (EDDmapS).[27] This species is largely bird-dispersed, but only a subset of bird species that eat the fruit are competent dispersers.[28] It is winter hardy in USDA zones: 3 to 8.[29] It is a prohibited species in a few US states; Minnesota lists it as a Restricted noxious weed making it illegal to import, sell, or transport the plant,[30] Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, also restrict or ban the plant, and Vermont lists it as a Class B noxious weed.[31]
Rhamnus cathartica is difficult to control in its invasive range, because it sprouts vigorously and repeatedly from the root collar following cutting, girdling or burning.[32] Herbicide application to newly cut stumps is a popular and effective control method, but seeds stay viable in the soil for several years before sprouting, so repeated treatments and long-term monitoring of infested areas is required.[33] Garlon and Tordon and their derivatives have been found to be effective chemical means of control. Roundup can be used but is less reliable.[13] An application of these chemicals in early winter reduces the risk of negatively affecting non-target species, as most have gone dormant by this time. It is also easier to spot infestations at this time of the year, as the leaves of R. catharticus stay out an average of 58 days longer than native plants.[13]
Mechanical control methods such as pulling and chopping of plants are more environmentally friendly, but also very time-consuming. Plants with stems less than half an inch in diameter or less than a metre (3') tall can easily be pulled, but pulling risks disturbing the roots of adjacent, native plants and harming them as well.[33] Propane weed-torches may also be used to kill seedlings, which will generally not resprout if burned in spring or early summer.[13]
The bark and fruit of Rhamnus cathartica were used as a purgative in traditional medicine,[34] but is generally no longer used for this purpose on account of the fruit's violent action and potentially dangerous effects on the body. [35] It also appeared to be routinely used as a purgative in some monastic settings, as was clear from the latrine pits of the Benedictine Abbey at St Albans excavated in the 1920s, where great numbers of buckthorn seeds were found mixed up with the fragments of cloth used by the monks as lavatory paper[36]
The wood is hard and dense, and the bark yields a dye.[34]
_(7118329607).jpg)
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) {{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) .jpg)
Fruit Rhamnus cathartica, the European buckthorn, common buckthorn, purging buckthorn, or just buckthorn, is a species of small tree in the flowering plant family Rhamnaceae. It is native to Europe, northwest Africa and western Asia, from the central British Isles south to Morocco, and east to Kyrgyzstan. It was introduced to North America as an ornamental shrub in the early 19th century or perhaps before, and is now naturalized in the northern half of the continent, and is classified as an invasive plant in several US states and in Ontario, Canada.
Rhamnus catharticus, el espino cerval o cervispino, también conocido como cambrón, hediondo o ramno catártico, es un arbusto espinoso de la familia de las ramnáceas.
Es un arbusto tupido de 3-6 metros de altura. Ramas alternas, divergentes, terminadas en una espina. Hojas opuestas, ovales, caducas y de bordes dentados con 2-4 pares de nervios laterales muy marcados y de color verde brillante de 2-6 cm de longitud. Flores pequeñas y verdosas de cuatro pétalos, abundantes en grupos entre las hojas. Fruto en baya, negra y redonda del tamaño de un guisante. Son venenosas con olor nauseabundo.
Ampliamente distribuido por toda Europa, noroeste de África y Asia occidental en bosques, setos y espesuras, sobre todo en lugares soleados y pedregosos. Introducido en Norteamérica en el siglo XIX como ornamental allí se ha convertido en planta invasora.
Rhamnus catharticus fue descrita por Carlos Linneo y publicado en Species Plantarum 1: 193, en el año 1753.[1]
Rhamnus: nombre genérico que deriva de un antiguo nombre griego para el espino cerval.[2]
catharticus: epíteto latíno que significa "purgativo".[3]
Número de cromosomas de Rhamnus cathartica (Fam. Rhamnaceae) y táxones infraespecíficos: 2n=24[4]
Rhamnus catharticus, el espino cerval o cervispino, también conocido como cambrón, hediondo o ramno catártico, es un arbusto espinoso de la familia de las ramnáceas.
Harilik türnpuu (Rhamnus cathartica) on türnpuuliste sugukonda türnpuu perekonda kuuluv puu.
Teaduslikult kirjeldas türnpuud esimesena Linné, kes pani talle nimeks R. catharticus, aga hiljem selle õigekirja muudeti, sest Rhamnus on ladina keeles naissoost sõna.
Türnpuu kasvab Euraasias Briti saartelt kuni Kirgiisiani, samuti Loode-Aafrikas.
Türnpuu on Eesti looduses tavaline, kuid mitte nii sage kui harilik paakspuu.
19. sajandi alguses, aga võib-olla varemgi viidi türnpuu Põhja-Ameerikasse, kus ta muutus invasiivseks liigiks. Talle annab konkurentsieelise see, et ta lehtib kohalikest liikidest varem ja varjab sellega nende eest ära päikesevalguse, mistõttu viimased känguvad. Põhja-Ameerika Kesk-Läänes seostatakse türnpuud ka invasiivsete Euroopast pärit vihmaussidega: kui mingilt alalt kõik türnpuud hävitati, siis vähenes Euroopast pärit vihmausside biomass poole võrra.
Türnpuu kasvab harilikult kõrge põõsana, harva madala puuna. Ta on tavaliselt kuni 8, harva kuni 10 m kõrge. Tüvi võib vahel olla üpris jäme, hallikaspruuni puukoorega. Oksad lõpevad enamasti astlaga.
Türnpuu kasvab hajusalt metsades, võsades ja loodudel, enamasti väheviljakatel ja kuivadel muldadel.
Lehed paiknevad vastastikku paarikaupa ja on nahkjad, servadel väikeste sakkidega. Lehed on elliptilised või ovaalsed, 25–90 mm pikad ja 12–35 mm laiad. Lehed on rohelised, aga sügisel muutuvad kollaseks.
Õitseb mais-juunis. Õied on väikesed ja kollakasrohelised, 4 kroonlehega ja kahekojalised. Õisi tolmeldavad putukad.
Türnpuul on luuvili. See on must, marjataoline, läbimõõduga 6–10 mm, 2–4 seemnega, kibeda ja tülgastava maitsega, suurtes kogustes süües kergelt mürgine, tekitades kõhus krampe ja mõjudes lahtistina. Kuid linnud söövad türnpuu vilju meeleldi. Seemned ei seedu ja oma väljaheidetega linnud levitavad türnpuid.
Türnpuu puit on kõva, aga seda kasutatakse vähe. Selle tihedus on 720 kg/m³[1].
Türnpuud on lihtne kasvatada. Ta on vastupidav, talub varju ja võib kasvada ka linnas. Pinnas, millel kasvab palju türnpuid, sisaldab keskmisest rohkem lämmastikku ja vett ning on kõrgema pH-ga kui sarnased alad, kus türnpuid ei kasva. See võib olla seotud asjaoluga, et türnpuu lehed on lämmastikurikkad ja kõdunevad kergesti.
Minevikus kasutati türnpuud lahtistina, aga ohtlike kõrvaltoimete tõttu seda tänapäeval ei tehta.
Türnpuu marjadest ja koorest saadud kollast värvainet on kasutatud tekstiilide värvimiseks[2][3] ning sellest tehtud värvi kasutatud keskajal käsikirjade illumineerimiseks, hiljem ka tahvelmaalis (stil de grain)[4].
Harilik türnpuu (Rhamnus cathartica) on türnpuuliste sugukonda türnpuu perekonda kuuluv puu.
Teaduslikult kirjeldas türnpuud esimesena Linné, kes pani talle nimeks R. catharticus, aga hiljem selle õigekirja muudeti, sest Rhamnus on ladina keeles naissoost sõna.
Hesilaharra (Rhamnus cathartica) Rhamnaceae familiaren espeziea da, Europan, ipar-mendebaldeko Afrikan eta mendebaldeko Asian bizi dena.[1][2]. Zuhaixka toxikoa da gizaki zein animalientzat, eta libragarri moduan erabiltzen dute[3].
Artikulu hau biologiari buruzko zirriborroa da. Wikipedia lagun dezakezu edukia osatuz. Hesilaharra (Rhamnus cathartica) Rhamnaceae familiaren espeziea da, Europan, ipar-mendebaldeko Afrikan eta mendebaldeko Asian bizi dena.. Zuhaixka toxikoa da gizaki zein animalientzat, eta libragarri moduan erabiltzen dute.
Orapaatsama (Rhamnus cathartica) on paatsamakasvien heimoon kuuluva puuvartinen pensas.
Orapaatsama muistuttaa toista heimonsa pensasta korpipaatsamaa, mutta on erotettavissa siitä pienemmän kokonsa, sahalaitaisten lehtiensä ja oksanhaarojen piikkisten kärkiensä perusteella. Se kasvaa 2–4 metriä korkeaksi pensaaksi, harvoin pieneksi puuksi. Kukat ovat yksineuvoisia, kellanvihreitä ja 4-lehtisiä. Orapaatsama kukkii kesä–heinäkuussa. Marjat ovat pieniä, raakoina vihreitä ja kypsinä mustia.
Orapaatsaman levinneisyysalue ulottuu Keski-Euroopasta itään ja melko pitkälle Venäjälle.[3] Suomessa orapaatsama kasvaa luonnonvaraisena ainoastaan Ahvenanmaalla ja lounaissaaristossa. Kasvupaikkana on tavallisesti lehto tai lehtomainen kuiva rinne, kallio tai niitty. Luodoilla se kasvaa tavallisesti korkeimmalla paikalla muodostaen pienialaisia takkuisia pusikoita. Linnut syövät sen marjoja ja niiden ulosteiden mukana laji on levinnyt monille pienillekin luodoille. Saariston entisten laidunsaarien umpeenkasvu laiduntamisen loputtua on heikentänyt orapaatsaman elinmahdollisuuksia, sillä se vaatii kasvupaikaltaan valoisuutta.[4]
Orapaatsaman marjoista on valmistettu sekä sapenvihreää että keltaista väriä. Kuoresta saadaan keltaista väriä. Orapaatsaman pääasiallinen väriaine on kemferoli. Laji on lääkekasvi, joka tuoreena syötynä on myrkyllinen. Se on myös yleinen puutarhakasvi, joka koristepensaana menestyy rannikolla aina Oulun korkeudelle saakka.
Orapaatsama (Rhamnus cathartica) on paatsamakasvien heimoon kuuluva puuvartinen pensas.
Le Nerprun purgatif, Nerprun cathartique ou Nerprun officinal (Rhamnus cathartica), est l'une des quelques espèces de nerprun qu'on peut naturellement trouver en Europe alors que la plupart de la centaine d'espèces de nerprun sont tropicales ou subtropicales.
Linné a originellement nommé l'espèce Rhamnus catharticus, l'épithète ayant été corrigée en « cathartica » car « Rhamnus », le nom de genre, est féminin[1].
Rhamnus vient du grec rhamnos, qui désigne le Nerprun purgatif, et cathartica est dérivé du grec καθαρτικός, « purgatif ». Le terme français de « nerprun » dérive du latin populaire niger prunus (« prunier noir ») qui a donné aussi noirprun, synonyme de nerprun[2].
Le Nerprun purgatif est un arbrisseau caducifolié de deux à cinq mètres de haut. C'est une plante dioïque ou polygame, à l'écorce lisse, gris-brun. Les rameaux gris sont souvent terminés par une épine[3].
Les feuilles sont caduques, presque opposées, elliptiques à ovales, de 2,5 à 9 cm de long et 1,2 à 3,5 cm de large, finement dentées, aux nervures très apparentes, vertes virant au jaune à l'automne.
Les fleurs vert-jaune, à quatre pétales, sont rassemblées en grappes par cinq à dix. Elles sont unisexuées et pollinisées par les insectes.
Le fruit, de 6 à 10 mm de diamètre, est une drupe noire qui contient quatre graines. En quantité suffisante, c'est un poison pour l'homme, mais il est apprécié de nombreux oiseaux qui sèment les graines dans leurs fientes[4].
C'est une essence buissonnante, souvent introduite dans les haies ornementales.
En Europe, le nerprun est présent du centre de l'Angleterre jusqu'au sud de la Méditerranée et pour l'Asie on le trouve de l'ouest jusqu'au Kirghizistan vers l'est. On le trouve en France, Belgique, Suisse[5],[6].
Les fruits contiennent des substances anthracéniques à propriétés purgatives[réf. nécessaire]. Leur consommation peut entraîner des troubles digestifs plus ou moins graves suivant la quantité ingérée[réf. souhaitée]. Ils sont donc à considérer comme légèrement toxiques.
Ce nerprun peut s'avérer localement envahissant en Amérique du Nord là où il a été introduit[7]. Au Québec, il est considéré comme étant une plante nuisible à la biodiversité, car il est très compétitif face à la végétation indigène[8].
Comme son nom le suggère, le fruit et l'écorce de l'arbuste étaient autrefois utilisés comme purgatifs, mais leur toxicité (violents effets purgatifs et effets secondaires) fait qu'ils ont été abandonnés pour cet usage[9].
Des extraits de ses baies se révèlent très efficaces pour traiter la maladie du gros ventre (coccidiose) des lapins domestiques.
Son bois est dense et solide, mais peu utilisé.
Les fruits et les rameaux étaient récoltés autrefois, notamment dans le Comtat Venaissin, et utilisés pour leurs pouvoirs colorants comme teinture pour les tissus[10].
C'est la plante hôte du papillon citron. La présence du mâle jaune vif est un indice de présence du nerprun purgatif dans les environs.
Le Nerprun purgatif, Nerprun cathartique ou Nerprun officinal (Rhamnus cathartica), est l'une des quelques espèces de nerprun qu'on peut naturellement trouver en Europe alors que la plupart de la centaine d'espèces de nerprun sont tropicales ou subtropicales.
Pasjakovina (obična krkavina, pasja krkavina, trnovita krkavina, pasji trn, lat.Rhamnus cathartica) je biljka iz porodice pasjakovki (Rhamnaceae). Udomaćena je u Euraziji i Sjevernoj Africi, dok je u Sjevernu Ameriku unešena, te se tamo smatra invazivnom vrstom. Nekada se koristila kao ljekovita biljka, danas je njena uporaba većinom napuštena. Narod je pozna pod imenima bijela pasjakovina, kozja črešnja, krkavina obična, metuljeve jagode, pasdren, pasdrijen, pasja drenjina, pasje drvo, pasji dren i psikovina.
Slično kao i žestika i ona je grm koji voli suha i sunačana mjesta u svjetlim šumama. Plod joj je bobica crne boje gorkog okusa, od kojih se izrađuje sirup, ali njihovo prekomjerno konzumiranje može izazvati povraćanjsa i proljeve. Koriste se bobicwe i korom (danas rjeđe kod tzravara). Razne pasjakovine su općenito poznate po svom purgativnom djelovanju pa se mnogo koriste u službenoj medicini.
Pasjakovina (obična krkavina, pasja krkavina, trnovita krkavina, pasji trn, lat.Rhamnus cathartica) je biljka iz porodice pasjakovki (Rhamnaceae). Udomaćena je u Euraziji i Sjevernoj Africi, dok je u Sjevernu Ameriku unešena, te se tamo smatra invazivnom vrstom. Nekada se koristila kao ljekovita biljka, danas je njena uporaba većinom napuštena. Narod je pozna pod imenima bijela pasjakovina, kozja črešnja, krkavina obična, metuljeve jagode, pasdren, pasdrijen, pasja drenjina, pasje drvo, pasji dren i psikovina.
Prawy hokowc (Rhamnus cathartica) je kerk ze swójby hokowcowych rostlinow (Rhamnaceae).
Prawy hokowc je kerk, kotryž docpěje wysokosć wot 1 hač do 3 m. Hałuzy so často ze ćernjom skónča.
Łopjena su kulowate hač šěroko-jejkojte a docpěja dołhosć wot 4 hač do 6 cm. Wone njesu na woběmaj bokomaj 3-4 wobłukate nerwy. Na staršich hałuzach steja w promjenjach, mjeztym zo na młódšich hałuzach su přećiwostejne. Jich kroma je sćeńka rězana.
Łopjenowy stołpik je dlěše hač pódlanske łopješka.
Kćěje wot meje hač do junija. Žołtozelene, wonjace kćenja su štyriličbne, docpěja šěrokosć wot 4 hač do 5 mm a steja po dwěmaj hač po wosmjoch we łopjenowych rozporach.
Płody su čorne jahodojte póčkate płody, kotrež docpěja šěrokosć wot 6 hač do 8 mm.
Rosće w słónčnych žiwych płotach, na lěsnych kromach, w swětłych lěsach a suchich pastwach.
Rostlina ja w južnej Skandinawiskej, w srjedźnej a južnej Europje rozšěrjena.
Prjedy bu z płodow zelena barba zhotowana, kotraž bu w molerstwje a k barbjenju papjery a kože wužiwana.
Prawy hokowc (Rhamnus cathartica) je kerk ze swójby hokowcowych rostlinow (Rhamnaceae).
Lo Spino cervino (Rhamnus cathartica L., 1753) è una pianta arborea, appartenente alla famiglia delle Ramnacee, originaria dell'Europa e dell'Asia.
Presente nelle siepi ed ai margini dei boschi submontani, soprattutto nel settentrione. Predilige terreni calcarei, anche poveri e ghiaiosi, tendenzialmente aridi.
È un arbusto alto fino a 3–4 m con radice ramificata legnosa, caule cilindrico, rami piuttosto numerosi ed opposti, terminati all'apice da una spina situata fra le due branche dell'ultima biforcazione e pubescenti nella loro parte più giovane.
Le foglie sono alterne, opposte e molto ravvicinate, con stipole lesiniformi e caduche, picciolo pubescente superiormente scanalato, il lembo di regola è lungo il doppio del proprio picciuolo, ovato o ellittico, ottuso o brevemente acuminato con margine leggermente crenato seghettato, nervature pennate, pubescenti sulla pagina inferiore, mentre la superiore è glabra.
I fiori sono in fascetti all'ascella delle prime 2-3 coppie di foglie del ramo nuovo dell'anno. Sono dioici per aborto, verdognoli, lunghi 3–4 mm con ricettacola a coppa, che ha al bordo 4 sepali e 4 petali lunghi 1 mm, lanceolati, giallo verdi, più brevi del calice, alterni coi sepali e appena visibili. Dai fiori maschili ad ogni petalo è sovrapposto uno stame ben sviluppato ed il pistillo è ridottissimo, i femminili hanno gli stami sterili, il pistillo di quattro carpelli riuniti e stilo diviso in alto.
Il frutto è una bacca rivestita in parte da una coppa ricettacolare persistente, subglobosa, con diametro di 6–8 mm di colore nero a maturazione, con endocarpo cartilagineo, quadriloculare o anche biloculare per aborto di logge; ogni loggia ha un seme segnato da un solco dorsale.
Può essere confusa con Paliurus spina-christi ma quest'ultima ha il frutto secco e ad ala larga, oppure con Pyracantha coccinea che ha la drupa giallo-rossa
I frutti sia freschi che essiccati contengono antrachinoni, ramnoxantina, ramnoemodina, principi amari, ramnocatartina, sostanze coloranti (verde vescica), crisoramnina, ramnonigrina, quercitina, glucosio, acido succinico, succinato di calcio, resina, olio grasso ed altre sostanze.[1]
Vengono utilizzati i frutti in infusi o sciroppi a scopi lassativi, hanno anche effetti diuretici. Il sovradosaggio produce effetti collaterali quali vomito, dolori addominali e violente scariche diarroiche. Anche le bacche contengono molti dei principi sopra indicati, ma provocano effetti collaterali simili a quelli dati dalla corteccia fresca[1]. Il legno molto duro da lavorare, trova impiego nei lavori di tornio ed ebanisteria.[2]
Lo Spino cervino (Rhamnus cathartica L., 1753) è una pianta arborea, appartenente alla famiglia delle Ramnacee, originaria dell'Europa e dell'Asia.
Dygioji šunobelė (lot. Rhamnus cathartica) – šunobelinių (Rhamnaceae) šeimos augalas.
Paplitęs Europoje, Sibire, Kaukaze, Vidurinėje ir Mažojoje Azijoje. Aptinkama visoje Lietuvoje, gana dažna. Auga pavieniui dažniausiai pamiškėse, krūmynuose, upių, ežerų pakrantėse, šviesiuose miškuose.
Dažinis, dekoratyvinis, vaistinis, tanidinis, 1-4 m aukščio labai šakotas krūmas arba medelis. Laja rutuliška, žievė tamsiai ruda ar juosva. Tarpušakiuose ir ūglio viršūnėje dažniausiai turi dyglių. Lapai ovalūs, nusmailėjusiomis viršūnėmis, kraštai smulkiai dantyti. Vaisius – juodas, blizgantis kaulavaisis.
Iš vaisių atsižvelgiant į jų subrendimo laipsnį galima gaminti geltonus, žalius ir raudonus dažus audiniams. Džiovintų vaisių nuoviras ir užpilas laisvina vidurius. Žali vaisiai, šviežia žievė ir lapai nuodingi. Mediena tinkama smulkiems tekinimo ir stalių dirbiniams.
Medelis Dygioji šunobelė
Lapai ir vaisiai
Žievė
Iliustruotas Lietuvos augalų genčių vardynas · Lietuvos vietinės medžių ir krūmų rūšys · Lietuvos išskirtiniai medžiai · Lietuvos svetimžemė dendroflora · Pasaulio išskirtiniai medžiai
Miškas · Miško skliautas · Lietuvos miškai · Pasaulio miškai (šalys pagal miškų plotą) · Miškų nykimas (neteisėtas miško kirtimas)
Miškininkystė (ekologinė miškininkystė) · Miško atkūrimas · Įveisimas · Miškų ūkis · Miškų urėdija · Girininkija · Eiguva · Lietuvos miškų institutas
Dygioji šunobelė (lot. Rhamnus cathartica) – šunobelinių (Rhamnaceae) šeimos augalas.
De wegedoorn (Rhamnus cathartica) is een struik uit de wegedoornfamilie (Rhamnaceae). De plant lijkt een beetje op sporkehout (Rhamnus frangula).
Rhamnus is afgeleid van het Griekse "rhamnos" (naaien of steken), een verwijzing naar de dorens. De soortnaam cathartica stamt van het Griekse "katharein" (reinigen), een verwijzing naar de laxerende werking.[1]
De wegedoorn is inheems in Europa met inbegrip van zuidelijk Zweden, Ierland, Wales en Engeland, Noordwest-Afrika (Marokko, Algerije, Tunesië), en Westelijk Azië, zuidelijk tot noordelijk Turkije en noordelijk Iran, oostelijk tot Kirgizië. De soort is ook ingeburgerd in Noord-Amerika, grofweg in de noordelijke helft van de VS en het uiterste zuiden van Canada, maar nog niet in het uiterste westen. De wegedoorn komt vooral voor in bossen en aan bosranden en in struikgewas. De wegedoorn komt in Nederland plaatselijk vrij veel voor op leemgronden in het zuidoosten, in beek- en rivierdalen, en in de duinen van Zuid-Holland, met name op Voorne, maar in de duinen van Noord-Holland en de rest van het land is de soort schaars. In België is hij plaatselijk vrij algemeen in het Maasgebied, in Lotharingen, en in de duinen (vooral ten westen van de IJzer), en komt hier en daar voor in Oost-Vlaanderen, Brabant en in de Kempen.[1]
Wegedoorn is een bladverliezende, lage of middelhoge struik of kleine boom. Het kernhout is roodachtig bruin terwijl het spinthout geel is.[1] De zijtakken en bladeren staan bijna kruiswijs tegenover elkaar. De stam is grijs met veel lenticellen. De jonge takken hebben een strobruine kleur, zijn dun en recht. Meestal lopen de tweejarige takken uit in een slanke doorn, met aan weerszijden een jongere tak, vandaar de treffende Duitse naam "Kreuzendorn". De winterknoppen zijn bedekt met 6-8 bruinzwarte, lichtgerande schubben. De bladeren zijn verschillend van vorm, cirkelvormig tot langwerpig, met een toegespitste top, een fijngezaagde rand, een wigvormige of afgeknotte voet, en soms zijn de bladhelften ongelijk zoals bij de iep, en hebben een lange bladsteel. De 6-10 paren van prominent gegroefde nerven zijn aan de onderkant licht donzig behaard. Ze staan verspreid langs de stengels. De bloemen zijn klein, stervormig met vier groengele driehoekige bloemblaadjes, meestal functioneel eenslachtig, en staan samen in de bladoksels. Wegedoorn bloeit in mei en juni en wordt door insecten bestoven. De vrucht is een kleine bes (eigenlijk een meerkernige steenvrucht) van 6-10 mm in diameter die rijpt direct van groen naar zwart, met vier steenkernen elk met een zaad.[2][3]
Sporkehout verschilt van wegedoorn doordat het blad een constante vorm heeft, met twee gelijke helften, de bladrand niet fijngezaagd is maar gaaf, de bladstand niet bijna tegenoverstaand maar duidelijk verspreid is, de bloemen niet viertallig en functioneel eenslachtig zijn maar vijftallig en tweeslachtig, de plant eenhuizig is, de takken niet uitlopen in een doorn, de winterknoppen naakt zijn, en de halfrijpe bessen rood zijn in plaats van van groen direct zwart te worden.[3]
Wegedoorn prefereert een kalkhoudende grond en is een kensoort voor de klasse van de doornstruwelen (Rhamno-Prunetea). De wegedoorn groeit vaak samen met de eenstijlige en tweestijlige meidoorn, en in Oost-Nederland de wilde kardinaalsmuts. De plant is waardplant voor de dagvlinders citroenvlinder en boomblauwtje. Ook een aantal motten leeft van het blad van deze heester zoals de wegedoornspanner (Philereme transversata), de grote boomspanner (Triphosa dubitata), de rossige haakbladroller (Ancylis obtusana), de bladroller Bont smalsnuitje (Phtheochroa sodaliana) en de vuilboomooglapmot (Bucculatrix frangutella) die het blad mineert. Tot slot is de wegedoorn nog een waardplant voor de wants Apolygus rhamnicola, en de bladvlo Trichochermes walkeri. De bladeren van wegedoorn en sporkehout hebben vaak oranje zwellingen die worden veroorzaakt door kroontjesroest Puccinia coronata.[3]
winterknoppen met doorn
stam
bladonderkant van cultivar
bloemen
rijpe bessen
zaden
langsdoorsnede steenkern en dwarsdoorsnede vrucht
kleurenets tak
Mediabestanden die bij dit onderwerp horen, zijn te vinden op de pagina Rhamnus cathartica op Wikimedia Commons. De wegedoorn (Rhamnus cathartica) is een struik uit de wegedoornfamilie (Rhamnaceae). De plant lijkt een beetje op sporkehout (Rhamnus frangula).
Geitved (Rhamnus cathartica) er en stor, løvfellende busk eller et lite tre i geitvedslekten innenfor trollheggfamilien. Den har først en opprett vekst, men blir senere overhengende. Hvert skudd ender i en abortert grein, som blir til en torn. Bladene er ovale og rundtakkete med buede nerver. Oversiden er kraftig mørkegrønn. Blomstene er grønne og sees ikke. Den blomstrer i juni, og siden planten er særbu, sitter de hannlige blomstene samlet på rent hannlige individer og motsatt de hunnlige. Fruktene er svarte steinfrukter med en kjerne. Rotnettet består av grove, djuptgående hovedrøtter og fine, høytliggende siderøtter. Hele planten er giftig.
Planten hører hjemme på leiret, mineralrik bunn med konstant fuktighet. Geitved vokser i store deler av Europa, og vest i Asia, spredte lokaliteter i Nord-Afrika. Naturalisert seg i Nord-Amerika, hvor den stedvis blir betegnet som en invasjonsplante. I Norge finnes den bare i områder nær Oslofjorden.
Geitved (Rhamnus cathartica) er en stor, løvfellende busk eller et lite tre i geitvedslekten innenfor trollheggfamilien. Den har først en opprett vekst, men blir senere overhengende. Hvert skudd ender i en abortert grein, som blir til en torn. Bladene er ovale og rundtakkete med buede nerver. Oversiden er kraftig mørkegrønn. Blomstene er grønne og sees ikke. Den blomstrer i juni, og siden planten er særbu, sitter de hannlige blomstene samlet på rent hannlige individer og motsatt de hunnlige. Fruktene er svarte steinfrukter med en kjerne. Rotnettet består av grove, djuptgående hovedrøtter og fine, høytliggende siderøtter. Hele planten er giftig.
Planten hører hjemme på leiret, mineralrik bunn med konstant fuktighet. Geitved vokser i store deler av Europa, og vest i Asia, spredte lokaliteter i Nord-Afrika. Naturalisert seg i Nord-Amerika, hvor den stedvis blir betegnet som en invasjonsplante. I Norge finnes den bare i områder nær Oslofjorden.
Da finì.
Da finì.
Da finì.
Da finì.
DistribussionDa finì.
NotissieDa finì.
Szakłak pospolity Rhamnus cathartica L. – gatunek krzewu lub drzewa należący do rodziny szakłakowatych (Rhamnaceae). Występuje w Europie, Zachodniej Azji i Afryce Północnej[2]. W Polsce jest pospolity na całym niżu, na pogórzu występuje rzadziej.
Siedlisko: widne zarośla, lasy, zbocza. Mało wymagający co do gleby. W klasyfikacji zbiorowisk roślinnych gatunek charakterystyczny dla klasy (Cl.) Rhamno-Prunetea, Ass. Rhamno-Cornetum sanguinei[3]. Kwiaty są owadopylne, kwitną od maja do czerwca. Owoce dojrzewają we wrześniu, mają słodko-kwaśny smak i są trujące (szczególnie niedojrzałe).
Znaczenie dla zwierząt
Roślina dostarcza pokarmu 45 gatunkom owadów, w tym 6 gatunkom kózkowatych. Jest rośliną żywicielską larw motyli listkowca cytrynka oraz ogończyka tarninowca[4]. Kwiaty szakłaka są odwiedzane przez pszczoły, muchówki, motyle. Owocami żywi się 19 gatunków ptaków, m.in. rudzik, gil zwyczajny i grubodziób zwyczajny, a korę, liście, pędy i owoce zjada 8 gatunków ssaków, m.in. koszatka leśna i kuna leśna[5].
Roślina trująca. Zawiera podobne składniki, jak kruszyna pospolita, ale w mniejszej ilości, jest też słabiej od niej trujący. Jednorazowa dawka 30 suszonych owoców (dla dorosłego człowieka) jest bezpieczna – wywołuje tylko biegunkę.
Szakłak pospolity Rhamnus cathartica L. – gatunek krzewu lub drzewa należący do rodziny szakłakowatych (Rhamnaceae). Występuje w Europie, Zachodniej Azji i Afryce Północnej. W Polsce jest pospolity na całym niżu, na pogórzu występuje rzadziej.
Rhamnus catharticus é uma espécie de planta com flor pertencente à família Rhamnaceae.
A autoridade científica da espécie é L., tendo sido publicada em Species Plantarum 1: 193. 1753.
Trata-se de uma espécie presente no território português, nomeadamente em Portugal Continental.
Em termos de naturalidade é introduzida na região atrás indicada.
Não se encontra protegida por legislação portuguesa ou da Comunidade Europeia.
Rhamnus catharticus é uma espécie de planta com flor pertencente à família Rhamnaceae.
A autoridade científica da espécie é L., tendo sido publicada em Species Plantarum 1: 193. 1753.
Rešetliak prečisťujúci (Rhamnus cathartica, syn. Rhamnus catharticus) je ker z čeľade rešetliakovité.
Rešetliak je 2 - 3 m vysoký ker, málokedy nízky strom (maximálne 8 m vysoký), prevažne s krivým svalovitým kmeňom a riedkou korunou nepravidelného tvaru. Keď má dobré podmienky dožije sa i vyše 100 rokov. Kôra je sprvoti černastá a hladká, neskôr sa mení na čiernu borku, odlupujúcu sa v skrútených šupinách. Listy sú okrúhle až elipsovité, šikmo protistojné. Kvitne v zväzkoch. Plody sú okrúhle, za zrela čierne kôstkovičky.
Rozšírený je takmer v celej Európe a vo väčšine Sibíri.
Nezrelé kôstkovice sa používajú v ľudovom liečiteľstve, majú prečisťujúci účinok. Kedysi sa používali na výrobu tzv. „šťavnatej zelene“, farby, ktorou sa farbil papier, kože a cukrovinky.
Rešetliak prečisťujúci v Budapešti
Kvety
Sušené semená, droga používaná dnes najmä v ľudovom liečiteľstve
Commons ponúka multimediálne súbory na tému Rešetliak prečisťujúci
Wikidruhy ponúkajú informácie na tému Rešetliak prečisťujúci
Rešetliak prečisťujúci (Rhamnus cathartica, syn. Rhamnus catharticus) je ker z čeľade rešetliakovité.
Čistilna krhlika ali čistilna kozja češnja (znanstveno ime Rhamnus cathartica) je od enega do pet metrov visok listopadni grm ali redkeje drevo,
Čistilna krhlika se od navadne krhlike loči po nižji rasti in ima temnejšo skorjo, ki je bolj bleščeča in bolj gladka. Vejice čistilne krhlike imajo na vilicah bodice. Listi so dlakavi in na robovih nazobčani.
Cvetovi so svetlo zelene barve, iz oplojenih pa se razvijejo plodovi, ki so drobne, do 8 mm velike črnikasto modre kroglice. Čistilna krhlika cveti maja in junija, plodovi pa so zreli septembra in oktobra.
Grmi čistilne krhlike najbolje uspevajo na apnenčastih tleh med ostalim grmovjem. Najpogosteje jo najdemo v suhih gozdnih obronkih in ob poteh. Domovina vrste je Evropa, severozahodna Afrika in zahodna Azija. Na severu uspeva do britanskega otočja, na jugu pa do Maroka. Na vzhodu jo je mogoče najti vse do Kirgizistana[1][2]. Kasneje so jo kot okrasno drevo zanesli v Severno Ameriko, kjer je kasneje postala invazivna vrsta[2][3][4].
Plodovi vsebujejo antrakinone in flavonoide, zaradi česar se v ljudskem zdravilstvu uporabljajo ob kroničnem zaprtju. Odvajajo rahlo in počasi, kljub temu pa niso priporočljivi za otroke in dolgotrajno uporabo.
Čistilna krhlika ali čistilna kozja češnja (znanstveno ime Rhamnus cathartica) je od enega do pet metrov visok listopadni grm ali redkeje drevo,
Getapel eller vägtorn (Rhamnus cathartica) är en växt i familjen brakvedsväxter, släktet getaplar (Rhamnus).
Getapeln växer som buske eller lågt träd, och blir uppemot 8 meter högt. Grenspetsarna har långa tornar. Dess blad är fintandade och brett ovala med en antydan till hjärtform [1] och en typisk vridning av spetsen. Blommorna är gröngula och små, blomställningen är knippen i bladvecken. Frukten är en stenfrukt med tre kärnor, först röd och sedan svart, och den är giftig[2]. Giftet är irriterande på magslemhinnorna och ger rödfärgad urin.
Linné gav ursprungligen växten namnet Rhamnus catharticus (maskulinum), som emellertid senare ändrats till Rhamnus cathartica, som är femininum och anses språkligt riktigare benämning. Alla växters vetenskapliga namn anges numera i femininum, även om växten är ett skildkönat hanträd. Catharticus (katarsis) syftar på användning som laxerande medel. Rhamnus var en sorts tornig buske i klassisk grekisk och romersk litteratur[3].
Namnet Djävulens träd kommer från en gammal fabel om att Djävulen en gång körde med en get mot ett träd så häftigt att geten rände in mellan barken och veden så att getraggen blev sittande kvar.
Om man drar av barken på en getapel blir nämligen barken raggig på insidan. Möjligen är det detta som avspeglas även i det gotländska gaitä barkäträ. Uppenbarligen finns även ett språkligt samband med det nutida rikssvenska namnet getapel.
Orrmabärsträ kommer av att bären liknar ormbär, Paris quadrifolia.
Tornhögg är eventuellt en förvrängning av tornhägg med anledning av att bären liknar häggbär, Prunus padus.
Enligt en legend med anor i nordisk mytologi åstadkommes djup sömn eller ett dvalaliknande tillstånd om man sticker in en kvist getapel i örat. Se vidare sömntörne.
Valbjörk är resultatet av två förvanskningar:
Öländska vigeltorn kan antas vara en förvanskning av skånska väretorn.
Anknytning till sömn och dvala finns även i det engelska namnet dvalberry, som dock inte avser Rhamnus chatartica, utan kan vara endera av flera växter med narkotiska egenskaper, särskilt belladonna, Atropa belldonna.
Kräketorn anspelar på att förtäring av bären medför kräkning.[7]
Wikimedia Commons har media som rör Getapel.
Getapel eller vägtorn (Rhamnus cathartica) är en växt i familjen brakvedsväxter, släktet getaplar (Rhamnus).
Жостір проносний (Rhamnus cathartica L.) — рослина родини Жостерові. Місцеві назви — жестір, жерст, проскурина тощо.
Кущ або невелике деревце родини жостерових (1,5-8 м заввишки) з темною корою і супротивними гілками, які часто закінчуються колючкою. Молоді пагони сірі, блискучі. Листки супротивні (3-6 см завдовжки), яйцеподібні або еліптичні, дрібнозарубчасто-пилчасті, голі, з трьома-чотирма дугоподібними жилками на кожній половині листка, довгочерешкові. Квітки дрібні, здебільшого одностатеві, зібрані пучками по 10-15 у пазухах листків. Оцвітина квіток зеленувата, 4-5-членна, пелюстки чергуються з частками чашечки або їх немає зовсім. Чашечка вузькодзвоникувата. Жіночі квітки з однією маточкою, стовпчик — 24-роздільний, зав'язь верхня. Чоловічі квітки з чотирма тичинками. Плід — чорний, кулястий (6-8 мм у діаметрі), блискучий, містить три-чотири насінини.
Жостір проносний росте в листяних і мішаних лісах, на галявинах, узліссях, схилах балок. Світлолюбна рослина. Цвіте у травні-червні, плоди достигають у серпні-вересні.
Поширений по всій Україні, крім Карпат і крайнього півдня. Промислова заготівля можлива в Хмельницькій, Одеській, Вінницькій, Кіровоградській, Черкаській, Київській, Полтавській, Дніпропетровській, Харківській, Сумській, Донецькій і Луганській областях. Запаси сировини значні.
Лікарська, вітамінозна, медоносна, танідоносна, фарбувальна, жироолійна, деревинна, декоративна рослина.
У науковій медицині використовують плоди жостеру — Fructus Rhamni catharticae. Вони рекомендуються як проносний засіб, особливо при хронічних запорах. У великих дозах плоди мають блювотну дію і викликають запалення кишково-шлункового тракту. У плодах жостеру містяться цукор, пектин, камеді, смоли, бурштинова кислота, глюкозиди й фарбувальні речовини.
У народній медицині плоди жостеру використовують як проносний і блювотний засіб, проти водянки, подагри, при хронічних хворобах шкіри; настоєм плодів на спирту натираються при ревматизмі. Гілки використовують при виразці і катарах шлунка, а кору — при зниженій кислотності. У ветеринарії плоди й кору використовують також як проносний засіб.
Листки жостеру містять велику кількість вітаміну С (до 800 мг%) і можуть стати сировиною для одержання концентрату.
Жостір проносний — медонос, що дає підтримуючий взяток. Мед з нього рідкий, не кристалізується. Медопродуктивність — до 25 кг/га. У корі і листках містяться таніди (до 6 %), придатні для дублення шкур. Недостиглі плоди жостеру дають жовту фарбу, стиглі — смарагдово-зелену, перестиглі — пурпурово-червону, свіжа кора — яскраво-жовту, суха кора — коричневу, червону і чорну.
Насіня жостеру містить 8-12 % жирної олії, яка придатна для виробництва лаків і фарб. Деревина жостеру тверда, жовтувато з червонуватими прожилками, добре полірується; її можна використовувати для дрібних виробів, декоративної фанери, особливо ціняться напливи. Жостір проносний — декоративна рослина, витривала, швидко розмножується, але не рекомендується розводити її поблизу сільськогосподарських полів, оскільки вона є проміжним господарем іржастого гриба.
Плоди жостеру збирають у період достигання, зриваючи їх руками. Складають у відра або кошики. Сушать у печах або сушарках при температурі 50-60 , розстилаючи тонким шаром на решетах або листах. Сухі плоди пакують у мішки вагою по 50 кг. Зберігають у сухих, добре провітрюваних приміщеннях. Строк зберігання чотири роки.
Жостір проносний (Rhamnus cathartica L.) — рослина родини Жостерові. Місцеві назви — жестір, жерст, проскурина тощо.
Rhamnus cathartica là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Táo. Loài này được L. miêu tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1753.[2]
Rhamnus cathartica là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Táo. Loài này được L. miêu tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1753.
Крушина слабительная растёт как на солнечных сухих местах, так и на влажных почвах в заболоченных лесах. Встречается по канавам и у заборов, в зарослях кустарников, на кладбищах, по лесным опушкам и на болотах.
Распространена в Европе, Западной Сибири, Казахстане и Средней Азии, на Кавказе. Растёт по склонам холмов и речных долин, куртинами в степи, по склонам гор до 1700 м над уровнем моря, на галечниках. Местами образует довольно обширные заросли[4].
Во всех частях растения (в коре, листьях, почках и плодах) крушины содержатся антрагликозиды, которые обусловливают основное фармакологическое действие препаратов из растения. Основными антрагликозидами являются биозиды: глюкофрангулин А (6α-L-рамнозил-8β-D-глюкозид франгула-эмодина), глюкофрангулин В (6α-D-апиофуранозил-8β-D-глюкозид франгула-эмодина); монозиды франгулин А и франгулин В.
В листьях до 700 мг% витамина С[4].
Лекарственное, красильное растение, дающее почти всю цветовую гамму красителей; обеспечивает очень стойкое окрашивание шёлковых, шерстяных и хлопчатобумажных тканей, почти не выгорающих на солнце[4]. Используется также для получения древесины.
Медонос. Даёт пчёлам поддерживающий взяток после главных весенних медоносов. На влажных местах под пологом леса нектароносность увеличивается. Мёд жёлтый, не засахаривается[5].
Из листьев делали концентрат для витаминизации пищевых продуктов[4].
В качестве лекарственного сырья используют собранные поздней осенью зрелые и высушенные плоды крушины слабительной (лат. Fructus Rhamni catharticae)[3].
Состав веществ, определяющих слабительное действие, близок к веществам из коры крушины ломкой. Антрагликозид (антроновый гликозид) — франгулярозид и его производные глюкофрангулин, эмодин и франгулин определяют физиологическое действие крушины. Первичный антрагликозид франгулярозид обладает рвотным действием, а окисленные формы — слабительным.
药鼠李（学名：Rhamnus cathartica）为鼠李科鼠李属下的一个种。
可當作一種結腸的清潔劑及通便劑，對結腸障礙、便祕以及寄生蟲感染很有效。當成茶來服用時，味道非常苦。
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
|access-date=中的日期值 (帮助)
这是一篇與植物相關的小作品。你可以通过编辑或修订扩充其内容。 
![[2]](http://linnaeus.nrm.se/flora/di/rhamna/rhamn/rhamcatn.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](http://linnaeus.nrm.se/flora/di/rhamna/rhamn/rhamcatv.jpg){kind=link}