Figure 3.Comparative morphology of shell and penis in Bithynia radomani Glöer & Pešić, 2007 (a–b) Bithynia montenegrina (Wohlberedt, 1901) (c–d) and Bithynia hambergerae A. Reischütz, N. Reischütz & P.L. Reischütz, 2008 (e–f): a, c, e = shell, b, d, f = penis.
Figure 3.Hydrobioids collectedduring the survey in mainland and insular Greece. A Daphniola exigua (dorsal and ventral view) B Isimerope semele (dorsal and ventral view, Megali Vrysi) C Pseudoislamia balcanica (dorsal and ventral view, Ag. Sophia) D Pseudamnicola pieperi (Olympos) E Radomaniola cf. curta (spring of Louros river) F Radomaniola cf. curta (Ag. Sophia spring) G Trichonia trichonica H Pseudobithynia eubooensis. Scale bar 1 mm.
Figure 3.Comparative morphology of shell and penis in Bithynia radomani Glöer & Pešić, 2007 (a–b) Bithynia montenegrina (Wohlberedt, 1901) (c–d) and Bithynia hambergerae A. Reischütz, N. Reischütz & P.L. Reischütz, 2008 (e–f): a, c, e = shell, b, d, f = penis.