dcsimg

Lifespan, longevity, and ageing

provided by AnAge articles
Maximum longevity: 9.4 years (captivity) Observations: It has been reported that these animals may live up to 12 years (Bernhard Grzimek 1990), which is possible but unverified. Record longevity in captivity belongs to one specimen that lived 9.4 years (Richard Weigl 2005). Further studies are necessary.
license
cc-by-3.0
copyright
Joao Pedro de Magalhaes
editor
de Magalhaes, J. P.
partner site
AnAge articles

Morphology

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Female black-footed ferrets range in weight from 645 to 850 grams, while the weight of males ranges from 915 to 1,125grams. Mustela nigripes ranges in length from 380 to 600mm (head and body). In linear measurements, male black-footed ferrets are generally 10% larger than females. The fur of Mustela nigripes is yellowish-buff with pale underparts. The forehead, muzzle, and throat are white; while the feet are black. A black mask is observed around the eyes, which is well defined in young black-footed ferrets (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).

Range mass: 645 to 1125 g.

Other Physical Features: endothermic ; bilateral symmetry

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Life Expectancy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Average lifespan
Status: captivity:
12.0 years.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Habitat

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Black-footed ferrets can be found in the short or middle grass prairies and rolling hills of North America. Each ferret typically needs about 100-120 acres of space upon which to forage for food. They live within the abandoned burrows of prairie dogs and use these complex underground tunnels for shelter and hunting. A mother with a litter of three would need approximately 140 acres to survive (Massicot 2000, Nowak 1991).

Terrestrial Biomes: savanna or grassland

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Distribution

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Historically, Mustela nigripes ranged throughout the interior regions of North America, from southern Canada to northern Mexico. Mustela nigripes is the only ferret that is native to North America. Today, Mustela nigripes exists in the wild in three locations, northeastern Montana, western South Dakota, and southeastern Wyoming. All three locations are sites where they have been reintroduced after the original populations were extirpated. Mustela nigripes populations also exist in seven zoos and breeding facilities (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).

Biogeographic Regions: nearctic (Native )

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Trophic Strategy

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Black-footed ferrets rely primarily on prairie dogs for food. However, they sometimes eat mice, ground squirrels, and other small animals. Normally, over 90% of a black-footed ferret's diet consists of prairie dogs, which are hunted and killed within their burrows. A black-footed ferret typically consumes between 50-70 grams of meat per day. It has been observed that black-footed ferrets only kill enough to eat, and caches of stored food are not usually found (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Black-footed ferrets help control populations of prairie dogs, which are sometimes seen as pests because of their burrowing activities and because they as as reservoirs for zoonotic diseases such as bubonic plaque.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Benefits

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Black-footed ferrets are often seen as pests by ranchers. The tunnel systems that are used by ferrets and prairie dogs cause holes in the the earth in the grazing lands of cattle. Unfortunate livestock sometimes step into these holes and become lame, after which they must be destroyed.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Conservation Status

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Considered to be North America's rarest mammal. Black-footed ferrets have been heavily impacted by the extermination of prairie dogs. Ranchers poisoned prairie dogs because of destruction (tunneling and foraging) to rangelands. With the disappearance of prairie dogs, so too went black-footed ferrets. Numbers dropped to an astounding 31 in 1985, and by 1987 they were extinct in the wild. Of the original 100 million acres of black-footed ferret habitat, only 2 million acres remain. Many ferrets were also killed by a canine distemper epidemic that spread through the American grasslands.

Captive breeding and reintroduction programs are underway in several locations throughtout North America (Massicot 2000)

US Federal List: endangered

CITES: appendix i

IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: endangered

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Behavior

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Perception Channels: tactile ; chemical

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Reproduction

provided by Animal Diversity Web

Females become sexually mature at the age of one year. The breeding season typically extends through March and April. The gestation period ranges from 35-45 days. Litters range from 1-6 young, with an average litter size of 3.5 young. Young remain in the burrow for about 42 days before coming aboveground. During the summer months of July and August females and their young stay together, in the fall they separate as the young ferrets reach their independence. Females ferrets have three pairs of mammae. Ferrets are sexually dimorphic, with males being larger than the female. During the mating season, females aggressively solicit males. Black-footed ferrets exhibit a phenomenon known as "delayed implantation," in which the fertilized egg does not start developing until conditions are appropriate for gestation (Massicot 2000, Wilson & Ruff 1999, Nowak 1991, Hillman & Clark 1980).

Key Reproductive Features: gonochoric/gonochoristic/dioecious (sexes separate); sexual

Average gestation period: 43 days.

Average number of offspring: 3.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (male)
Sex: male:
365 days.

Average age at sexual or reproductive maturity (female)
Sex: female:
365 days.

license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
The Regents of the University of Michigan and its licensors
bibliographic citation
Briercheck, K. and R. Csomos 2001. "Mustela nigripes" (On-line), Animal Diversity Web. Accessed April 27, 2013 at http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Mustela_nigripes.html
author
Ken Briercheck, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
author
Rebecca Ann Csomos, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
editor
Cynthia Sims Parr, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
original
visit source
partner site
Animal Diversity Web

Biology

provided by Arkive
The black-footed ferret is an alert, agile, nocturnal animal, which spends the day in prairie dog burrows (7). More than 90 percent of the diet consists of prairie dogs, which are attacked whilst they sleep in their burrows (3), although mice, ground squirrels, voles and other small mammals are also taken (6). This species is solitary, except during the breeding season, which runs from March to April (6). Females give birth to litters of between three to six young (known as kits), and rear their offspring without help from the male. The young, which are born blind and helpless and covered with thin white hair (3), stay in the burrow for about 42 days before venturing above ground, and remain with their mother until the autumn, after which time they disperse (6). These ferrets have excellent senses of hearing, sight and smell, and olfactory communication (urination and defecation) is very important in the maintenance of dominance hierarchies and following trails at night (6). Vocalisations include chattering and hissing (6).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Conservation

provided by Arkive
The black-footed ferret was thought to be extinct in the 1970s until a last population was discovered in Meeteetse, Wyoming in 1981 (5). Under initial protection measures, this population increased in numbers but then became infected by canine distemper and plague, which threatened to completely wipe out the species (5). As a last resort, the final 18 wild animals were caught and brought into captivity between 1985 and 1987, and a successful captive-breeding programme has been running ever since (3) (8). The US Fish and Wildlife Service's revised 'Black-Footed Ferret Recovery Plan' of 1988 prescribed the long-term target of establishing ten or more separate, self-sustaining wild populations, aiming to have 1,500 ferrets in the wild by 2010 (9). As of 2008, populations had been reintroduced to 18 sites, and with up to 250 wild born individuals distributed amongst several of these populations, the black-footed ferret was reclassified by the IUCN, moving from Extinct in the Wild to Endangered (1). While this is a fantastic conservation success story, wild ferret populations remain small (1), and conservation will need to continue if this species' future is to be secured.
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Description

provided by Arkive
Once classified as Extinct in the Wild, the black-footed ferret is one of the world's rarest mammals and the only ferret native to North America (1) (5). This slender animal has a yellowish coloured coat (2), pale underparts (6), and a dark tail tip and black feet (2). The muzzle, throat and forehead are white and there is a black mask around the eyes (6). As with most members of the genus Mustela, the males are larger and much heavier than females (2). The legs are short and the large front paws are armed with claws for digging (3).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Habitat

provided by Arkive
This species is an inhabitant of shortgrass and midgrass prairies (5), where there is an abundance of prairie dog 'towns' (Cynomys species) (7). A very large area of suitable habitat with a large population of prairie dogs is required to support the species; a single black-footed ferret needs between 40 and 60 hectares (7).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Range

provided by Arkive
The black-footed ferret was once common throughout the Great Plains from Alberta in Canada to southwestern USA, but by 1987, the species was extinct in the wild (3). Today, following concerted conservation efforts, reintroduced black-footed ferret populations exist in eight western states and Chihuahua (Mexico) (1) (7) (8). However, only three of these populations, two in South Dakota and one in Wyoming, are considered self-sustaining (1).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Status

provided by Arkive
Classified as Endangered (EN) by the IUCN Red List (1), and listed on Appendix I of CITES (4).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Threats

provided by Arkive
The number of black-footed ferrets plummeted in the first half of the 20th century, primarily as a result of habitat loss. Prairies have been modified for intensive agriculture and there is now less than two percent of the original ferret habitat left (3). The ferret's main prey, prairie dogs, were systematically poisoned in vast tracts of their habitat by a government eradication programme in the mid 1900s (5). Prairie dog burrows were thought to damage cropland and ferret numbers fell in direct proportion with the dramatic decline of their prey (3). The final threat to black-footed ferret numbers, and perhaps the most pertinent today, is disease, particularly canine distemper and plague (3). Plague, introduced to North America, causes even greater devastation in populations of prairie dogs and ferrets than it caused in human populations of Europe and Asia (8).
license
cc-by-nc-sa-3.0
copyright
Wildscreen
original
visit source
partner site
Arkive

Conservation Status

provided by EOL staff

The spread of cattle ranching, farming and urban development in the 20th Century in the Great Plains has greatly stressed the North American prairie ecosystem. Ranchers asserted that grazing by prairie dogs deprived cattle of much otherwise available forage and began a campaign to eradicate this ‘pest’ species through strychnine poisoning (Jachowski and Lockhart, 2009). Black-footed ferrets, being a highly specialized predator on prairie dogs thus declined. In 1964 black-footed ferrets were believed to be extinct when a remnant population was found in South Dakota (Howard et al, 2002). Captive breeding of animals from this population was attempted at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in Maryland, but ultimately failed due to a flawed canine distemper vaccine and the disappearance of the wild population. In 1981the species was again believed extinct when a ranch dog near Meeteese,Wyoming brought home a dead ferret. From 1985 to 1987 the last 18 individuals were captured and brought into captivity, but only seven produced offspring. Since then the program has produced well over 6,000 animals. Over 3,000 captive-born ferrets have been released at 18 release sites ranging across the Great Plains and one in Mexico. Of these sites only two, Shirley Basin in Wyoming and Conata Basin in South Dakota, are showing a natural increase in population size. The ferret populations at the other sites may currently be too low to ensure survival into the future. Black-footed ferret prospects improve with larger habitat area and greater densities of prairie dogs. In addition diseases, such as plague or canine distemper, can wipe out ferrets locally. As of 2009 there are estimated to be over 800 black-footed ferrets in the wild, but only about 300 breeding adults (Jachowski and Lockhart, 2009).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
Ososky, John
author
Ososky, John
original
visit source
partner site
EOL staff

Management

provided by EOL staff

Role of the Smithsonian in the Black-footed Ferret Recovery Program

In 1980 the black-footed ferret, Mustela nigripes, was feared extinct when an isolated remnant population was discovered Meeteese, Wyoming. In 1985 through 1987 the last 18 known individuals were captured and transported to a Wyoming Fish and Game facility for captive breeding. Only seven individuals successfully bred, from whom all living members of the species have descended. In 1988 the Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park became the first zoo to participate in the program when seven of the founders’ direct descendants were transferred to the Conservation Research Center in Front Royal, Virginia. In the mid-1980’s NZP researchers developed artificial insemination techniques on domestic ferrets and the Siberian polecat for use on black-footed ferrets. Techniques developed include evaluation of male testes and sperm, electroejaculation, cryopreservation of sperm and artificial insemination. From 1989 to 2009 566 ferrets were born at the CRC, 143 by artificial insemination. AI helped to insure against loss of the genetic diversity present in the founders. Positive results demonstrate that reproductive techniques are valuable for generating new knowledge of relevance to natural and assisted breeding and producing genetically valuable offspring useful for breeding stock and/or reintroduction (Hoard et al, 2002).

license
cc-by-nc
copyright
Ososky, John
author
Ososky, John
original
visit source
partner site
EOL staff

Associated Plant Communities

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: grassland, shrub

Historical habitats of the black-footed ferret included shortgrass prairie [41,49,65], mixed-grass prairie [27,49], desert grassland [51], shrub steppe [12,75], sagebrush steppe [7,11,12,20,30], mountain grassland, and semi-arid grassland [37].

Vegetation types occurring in 4 inventoried historic black-footed ferret habitats in Wyoming include: birdfoot sagebrush (Artemisia petadifida)/ western wheatgrass (Pascopyron smithii); big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata); low sagebrush (Artemisia arbuscula)/mixed-grass (bottlebrush squirreltail (Elymus elymoides), western wheatgrass, and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda)); Gardner's saltbush (Atriplex gardneri)/mixed-grass (Sandberg bluegrass and cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum)); thickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolatus)-threadleaf sedge (Carex filifolia); mixed shrub (Artemisia spp.)/mixed-grass (thickspike wheatgrass and blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis)); and Gardner's saltbush [20].

Current habitat occupied by black-footed ferrets near Meeteetse, Wyoming, is wheatgrass (Agropyron spp.)-needlegrass (Stipa spp.) shrubsteppe (Artemisia spp.), dominated by bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), western wheatgrass, prairie junegrass (Koeleria macrantha), and big sagebrush [12,16,17,20,30]. Suitable habitat for black-footed ferrets near Meeteetse, Wyoming, may include meadows or saltbush (Atriplex spp.)/rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus spp.) [5].

Information about plant communities at black-footed ferret reintroduction sites is sparse. In Aubrey Valley, Arizona, habitat is grassland dominated by blue grama, galleta grass (Hilaria jamesii), Indian ricegrass (Oryzopsis hymenoides), and other unspecified grasses [1].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Common Names

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
black-footed ferret
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Cover Requirements

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density

Black-footed ferrets use prairie dog burrows for raising young, avoiding predators, and thermal cover [28,36,39]. Six black-footed ferret nests found near Mellette County, South Dakota, were lined with buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides), prairie threeawn (Aristita oligantha), sixweeks grass (Vulpia octoflora), and cheatgrass [65]. High densities of prairie dog burrows provide the greatest amount of cover for black-footed ferrets [28,39,61]. Black-tailed prairie dog colonies contain a greater burrow density per acre than white-tailed prairie dog colonies, and may be more suitable for the recovery of black-footed ferrets [39].

Type of prairie dog burrow may be important for occupancy by black-footed ferrets. Black-footed ferret litters near Meeteetse, Wyoming, were associated with mounded white-tailed prairie dog burrows, which are are less common than non-mounded burrows. Mounded burrows contain multiple entrances and probably have a deep and extensive burrow system that protects kits [28,39]. According to Richardson and others [61], however, black-footed ferrets used non-mounded prairie dog burrows (64%) more often than mounded burrows (30%) near Meeteetse, Wyoming.

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Direct Effects of Fire

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: fire severity, severity

There are no reports of direct black-footed ferret mortality due to fire. Subterranean burrows may serve as protection from fire depending on fire severity [23].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Distribution

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals

The historical range of the black-footed ferret was closely correlated with, but not restricted to, the range of prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.). Its range extended from southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan south to Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona [18,37,70].

As of 2007, the only known wild black-footed ferret population is located on approximately 6,000 acres (2,428 ha)in the western Big Horn Basin near Meeteetse, Wyoming [13,15,17,18,30,39,45,61]. It is possible that other wild black-footed ferret populations exist but remain undetected [12,37]. Since 1990, black-footed ferrets have been reintroduced to the following sites: Shirley Basin, Wyoming; UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge and Fort Belknap Reservation, Montana; Conata Basin/Badlands, Buffalo Gap National Grasslands, and the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation in South Dakota; Aubrey Valley, Arizona [4,71]; Wolf Creek, Colorado; Coyote Basin, straddling Colorado and Utah [4]; and northern Chihuahua, Mexico [71]. Additional sites are being considered for the reintroduction of black-footed ferrets. NatureServe provides a distributional map for black-footed ferrets.

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Food Habits

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: hibernation, litter

Up to 91% of black-footed ferret diet is composed of prairie dogs [18,34,36,65,66]. Most research indicates that prairie dogs are required prey for black-footed ferrets [6,10,13,16,26,36,53,53,64,67]. However, according to Owen and others [58], established colonies of prairie dogs may not be a prerequisite for successful reintroductions of black-footed ferrets. Anecdotal observations and 42% of examined fossil records indicated that any substantial colony of medium- to large-sized colonial ground squirrels, such as Richardson's ground squirrels (Spermophilus richardsonii), may provide a sufficient prey base and a source of burrows for black-footed ferrets. This suggests that black-footed ferrets and prairie dogs did not historically have an obligate predator-prey relationship [58].

Diet of black-footed ferrets varies depending on geographic location. In western Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and Montana, black-footed ferrets historically associated with white-tailed prairie dogs and were required to find alternate prey when white-tailed prairie dogs hibernated for 4 months of the year [10,34]. In Wyoming, alternate prey items consumed during white-tailed prairie dog hibernation included voles (Microtus spp.) and mice (Peromyscus spp. and Mus spp.) found near streams. In South Dakota, black-footed ferrets associate with black-tailed prairie dogs. Because black-tailed prairie dogs do not hibernate, little seasonal change in black-footed ferret diet is necessary [10,61].

In Mellette County, South Dakota, black-tailed prairie dog remains occurred in 91% of 82 black-footed ferret scats. Mouse remains occurred in 26% of scats. Mouse remains could not be identified to species; however, deer mice, northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster), and house mice (Mus musculus) were captured in snap-trap surveys [66]. Potential prey items included thirteen-lined ground squirrels (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus), plains pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius), mountain cottontails (Sylvilagus nuttallii), upland sandpipers (Bartramia longicauda), horned larks (Eremophila alpestris), and western meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) [36].

Based on 86 black-footed ferret scats found near Meeteetse, Wyoming, 87% of black-footed ferret diet was composed of white-tailed prairie dogs. Other food items included deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), sagebrush voles (Lemmiscus curtatus), meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), mountain cottontails , and white-tailed jackrabbits (Lepus townsendii) [7]. Water is obtained through consumption of prey [39].

One adult female black-footed ferret and her litter require approximately 474 to 1,421 black-tailed prairie dogs/year or 412 to 1,236 white-tailed prairie dogs/year for sustenance. These figures assume that each adult black-footed ferret occupies 1 prairie dog colony, each young black-footed ferret will disperse to a new colony when mature, and prairie dogs are the only prey species available. This dietary requirement would require protection of 91 to 235 acres (37-95 ha) of black-tailed prairie dog habitat or 413 to 877 acres (167-355 ha) of white-tailed prairie dog habitat for each female black-footed ferret with a litter [68].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Habitat-related Fire Effects

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, fire regime, grassland, habitat type, low-severity fire, natural, potential natural vegetation, potential natural vegetation group, selection, severity, shrub, shrubland, shrubs

As of 2007, no research has examined HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS for the black-footed ferret, and little is known about the effects of fire on prairie dogs. Despite the lack of information, some inferences may be possible. Because black-footed ferrets and prairie dogs occupy the same vegetation communities, HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS may be similar between the 2 species. If fire decreases or destroys prairie dog populations, associated black-footed ferret populations would most likely suffer from a loss in the prey base (see Food habits) and cover (see Cover Requirements).

An FEIS review on the black-tailed prairie dog suggests that fire may have positive or negative effects, depending on burn severity and season. Low-severity burns conducted during spring in non-drought years may stimulate the growth of black-tailed prairie dog colonies by reducing vegetational height and density at the colony periphery [24,25,35,40,42,43,44,55,57,60,69,73,76]. Prescribed burning and mechanical brush removal around the perimeter of black-tailed prairie dog colonies may encourage the expansion of black-tailed prairie dog colonies. High-severity burns have the potential of reducing habitat quality in a black-tailed prairie dog colony, at least in the short-term [67]. During the plant growing season, the absence of fire provides optimal conditions for black-tailed prairie dog colony growth [44]. For more information about HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS for the black-tailed prairie dog, see the FEIS review on the black-tailed prairie dog.

To increase the total area of prairie dog colonies in locations such as Grasslands National Park, range improvement via burning, seeding, grazing, or mowing tall vegetation is recommended before introducing black-footed ferrets [45]. Reintroductions of black-footed ferrets have been carried out at several locations (see Animal Distribution and Occurrence) but as of 2007, very little information has been published about habitat types at reintroduction sites, so HABITAT RELATED FIRE EFFECTS are unknown. If the habitat type is known at a black-footed ferret reintroduction site, refer to the table below for fire regime information.

The following table provides fire regime information on vegetation communities in which black-footed ferrets may occur. The selection of vegetation communities was based on vegetation communities inhabited by black-footed ferrets and prairie dogs, as well as limited historical data on black-footed ferret habitat. Black-footed ferrets may not currently occur in all of the habitat types listed, and some community types, especially those used rarely, may be omitted.

Fire regime information on vegetation communities in which the black-footed ferret may occur. For each community, fire regime characteristics are taken from the LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Vegetation Models [47]. These vegetation models were developed by local experts using available literature, local data, and/or expert opinion as documented in the .pdf file linked from each Potential Natural Vegetation Group listed below. Cells are blank where information is not available in the Rapid Assessment Vegetation Model. Southwest Great Basin Northern Rockies Northern Great Plains South-central US Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics Percent of fires Mean interval
(years) Minimum interval
(years) Maximum interval
(years) Southwest Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics Percent of fires Mean interval
(years) Minimum interval
(years) Maximum interval
(years) Southwest Grassland Desert grassland Replacement 85% 12     Surface or low 15% 67     Desert grassland with shrubs and trees Replacement 85% 12     Mixed 15% 70     Shortgrass prairie Replacement 87% 12 2 35 Mixed 13% 80     Shortgrass prairie with shrubs Replacement 80% 15 2 35 Mixed 20% 60     Shortgrass prairie with trees Replacement 80% 15 2 35 Mixed 20% 60     Plains mesa grassland Replacement 81% 20 3 30 Mixed 19% 85 3 150 Plains mesa grassland with shrubs or trees Replacement 76% 20     Mixed 24% 65     Montane and subalpine grasslands Replacement 55% 18 10 100 Surface or low 45% 22     Montane and subalpine grasslands with shrubs or trees Replacement 30% 70 10 100 Surface or low 70% 30     Southwest Shrubland Southwestern shrub steppe Replacement 72% 14 8 15 Mixed 13% 75 70 80 Surface or low 15% 69 60 100 Low sagebrush shrubland Replacement 100% 125 60 150 Mountain sagebrush (cool sage) Replacement 75% 100     Mixed 25% 300     Great Basin Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics Percent of fires Mean interval
(years) Minimum interval
(years) Maximum interval
(years) Great Basin Grassland Great Basin grassland Replacement 33% 75 40 110 Mixed 67% 37 20 54 Great Basin Shrubland Basin big sagebrush Replacement 80% 50 10 100 Mixed 20% 200 50 300 Wyoming big sagebrush semidesert Replacement 86% 200 30 200 Mixed 9% >1,000 20 >1,000 Surface or low 5% >1,000 20 >1,000 Wyoming sagebrush steppe Replacement 89% 92 30 120 Mixed 11% 714 120   Mountain big sagebrush Replacement 100% 48 15 100 Mountain sagebrush (cool sage) Replacement 75% 100     Mixed 25% 300     Black and low sagebrushes Replacement 33% 243 100   Mixed 67% 119 75 140 Black and low sagebrushes with trees Replacement 37% 227 150 290 Mixed 63% 136 50 190 Northern Rockies Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics Percent of fires Mean interval
(years) Minimum interval
(years) Maximum interval
(years) Northern Rockies Grassland Northern prairie grassland Replacement 55% 22 2 40 Mixed 45% 27 10 50 Mountain grassland Replacement 60% 20 10   Mixed 40% 30     Northern Rockies Shrubland Wyoming big sagebrush Replacement 63% 145 80 240 Mixed 37% 250     Basin big sagebrush Replacement 60% 100 10 150 Mixed 40% 150     Low sagebrush shrubland Replacement 100% 125 60 150 Mountain big sagebrush steppe and shrubland Replacement 100% 70 30 200 Northern Great Plains Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics Percent of fires Mean interval
(years) Minimum interval
(years) Maximum interval
(years) Northern Plains Grassland Northern mixed-grass prairie Replacement 67% 15 8 25 Mixed 33% 30 15 35 Southern mixed-grass prairie Replacement 100% 9 1 10 South-central US Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics Percent of fires Mean interval
(years) Minimum interval
(years) Maximum interval
(years) South-central US Grassland Desert grassland Replacement 82% 8     Mixed 18% 37     Southern shortgrass or mixed-grass prairie Replacement 100% 8 1 10 South-central US Shrubland Southwestern shrub steppe Replacement 76% 12     Mixed 24% 37     *Fire Severities:
Replacement=Any fire that causes greater than 75% top removal of a vegetation-fuel type, resulting in general replacement of existing vegetation; may or may not cause a lethal effect on the plants.
Mixed=Any fire burning more than 5% of an area that does not qualify as a replacement, surface, or low-severity fire; includes mosaic and other fires that are intermediate in effects,
Surface or low=Any fire that causes less than 25% upper layer replacement and/or removal in a vegetation-fuel class but burns 5% or more of the area [33].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Management Considerations

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, natural, presence

As of December 2006, 700 black-footed ferrets exist in the wild [71]. The national goal for a change in status of the black-footed ferret from endangered to threatened is to establish 10 wild, self-sustaining populations, each containing >30 breeding adults, and a total of 1,500 individuals spread over the widest possible geographic area [16,71]. Recovery efforts for black-footed ferrets include preserving prairie dog habitat [7,10,11,12,13,16,53,67], preserving remaining wild black-footed ferret populations, locating new black-footed ferret populations, and captive breeding and reintroduction into wild habitats [11,13,39,49].

Historically, large, nearly contiguous prairie dog colonies were interspersed with small, isolated colonies [28]. As a result of habitat fragmentation and eradication programs, prairie dog colonies are now smaller and more fragmented [7]. Prairie dog populations have recovered in many areas of the United States; however, the size and distribution of protected colonies are probably not sufficient to support large, stable populations of black-footed ferrets [53]. Clark [11] suggests that in rare species management, habitat should receive priority over scientific measurements.

To attract and maintain black-footed ferret populations, colony size and intercolony distance of prairie dogs are important [16,28]. Small peripheral prairie dog colonies that are associated with larger prairie dog colonies may be beneficial for occupancy by black-footed ferrets [30]. Hillman and others [38] and Forrest and others [28] recommend that each prairie dog colony within a complex of prairie dog colonies be >30 acres (12 ha), and ideally >124 acres (50 ha) in area. A preliminary estimate of 9,884 to 14,830 acres (4,000-6,000 ha) of prairie dog habitat is needed to support a minimum viable population of 100 black-footed ferrets [28,39]. Prairie dog complexes of this size are ideal but rare. Black-footed ferret populations can be maintained on smaller prairie dog complexes if genetic and population manipulations are conducted [28]. If prairie dog colonies are too small and spaced too far apart, black-footed ferrets will not be able to sustain themselves due to lack of food, burrows, and thermal cover. If prairie dog colonies are large and close together, it is easier for black-footed ferrets to move among prairie dog colonies [28,39]. In order to support black-footed ferret populations, most prairie dog colonies within a complex should occur within 4 miles (7 km) of each other, which is the distance that 1 black-footed ferret may travel in 1 night [28]. See Forrest and others [28] for a hypothetical prairie dog complex that may support black-footed ferrets. 

White-tailed prairie dogs and black-tailed prairie dog colonies may offer slightly different advantages to black-footed ferrets. Some research suggests that black-footed ferrets may have a better chance of survival within black-tailed prairie dog colonies located in the Great Plains than those within white-tailed prairie dog colonies located in Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Colorado [10,16]. Great Plains habitat supports dense colonies of black-tailed prairie dogs covering extensive areas, compared to white-tailed prairie dog habitat, where populations rarely exceed 100 individuals or several hectares in size. Burrow density is greater in Great Plains habitat, providing more cover for black-footed ferrets [39]. Because black-tailed prairie dogs do not hibernate, they provide a year-round food source for black-footed ferrets. The Great Plains also have more rainfall and more productive vegetation than white-tailed prairie dog habitat [10,16,39]. Other research suggests that black-footed ferrets have a better chance of survival within white-tailed prairie dog colonies because white-tailed prairie dogs occupy less-defined living areas, so the spread of sylvatic plague is inhibited [4,28].

A habitat suitability index model was designed by Houston and others [39] to locate reintroduction sites for black-footed ferrets. The model assumes that black-footed ferrets can meet year-round requirements in prairie dog colonies provided that prairie dog colonies are large enough, their burrows are numerous enough, and adequate prey are available for black-footed ferrets. The habitat suitability model should apply throughout the black-footed ferret's historic range [39]. A field habitat model was created by Miller and others [54] to compare prairie dog complexes with known black-footed ferret habitat. The model was created as an inexpensive method to search for black-footed ferret populations and to provide a rapid method for initial identification of prairie dog complexes to be considered for reintroduction sites. After sites are identified, they could be analyzed for reintroduction potential by Houston and others' [39] model [54].

Locating additional wild black-footed ferret populations may increase chances of recovery [16]. Trench-like formations are reliable indicators of black-footed ferret presence. Black-footed ferrets dig 2 to 10 foot (1-3 m) long trenches in prairie dog burrows to modify burrows and locate prey [36,49,61]. Prairie dogs destroy the trenches and plug new black-footed ferret burrows within 2 hours of sunrise. Black-footed ferret surveys must therefore be conducted before sunrise [49].

Captive breeding currently occurs at several zoos and the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Wyoming [71]. Captive breeding of black-footed ferrets allows population genetics, predation, and disease to be monitored and controlled [53]. Breeding black-footed ferrets in captivity and finding suitable sites for reintroduction are difficult [50]. Some problems associated with raising black-footed ferrets in captivity include abnormal physical features, lack of critical behavioral skills, and diseases [31]. For information about husbandry and veterinary care of black-footed ferrets, see Carpenter and Hillman [8]. Despite positive results with captive breeding, habitat destruction and disease in natural habitats will continue to be an issue [53].

Habitat management activities suggested for black-footed ferrets occupying white-tailed prairie dog colonies include: 1) recording white-tailed prairie dog emergence and breeding in late winter; 2) determining white-tailed prairie dog reproductive success in late spring; 3) mapping active and inactive white-tailed prairie dog colonies each fall; and 4) surveying alternate prey populations in late summer and early fall. For a detailed outline of annual monitoring and protection management needed for black-footed ferrets in Meeteetse, Wyoming, see Clark [13].

For information about current recovery efforts for the black-footed ferret, see the website for the National Black-Footed Ferret Recovery Program.

Domestic livestock grazing: According to Carrier and Czech [9], where wildlife occupy ecosystems used for livestock forage, grazing often alters these ecosystems, and native species often experience population declines as a result. Black-footed ferrets are a "priority species" in Arizona and New Mexico, meaning that they should receive greater consideration than non-priority wildlife species during development of management strategies related to livestock grazing [78].

Linder and others [48] recommend preserving prairie dog colonies for black-footed ferrets by obtaining easements from ranchers. A rancher could continue grazing livestock in a normal manner, but an easement could stipulate that prairie dogs not be eliminated or controlled using methods that are detrimental to black-footed ferrets. The rancher could be compensated for any increase in the size of prairie dog colonies. Miller and others [53] suggest an integrated management plan that satisfies ranchers and the conservation of grasslands. Federal money that is traditionally allocated to the prairie dog poisoning program could be used as a rebate for ranchers that manage livestock and preserve prairie dog colonies [53].

Other: Oil and natural gas exploration and extraction can have detrimental impacts on prairie dogs and black-footed ferrets. Seismic activity collapses prairie dog burrows. Other problems include potential leakages and spills, increased roads and fences, increased vehicle traffic and human presence, and an increased number of raptor perching sites on power poles. Traps set for coyotes, American mink (Mustela vison), and other animals may harm black-footed ferrets [13].

Native American tribes including the Crow, Blackfoot, Sioux, Cheyenne, and Pawnee used black-footed ferrets for religious rites and for food [10].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Predators

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
Predators of black-footed ferrets include golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) [30,36,41], great-horned owls (Bubo virginianus) [28,30,36,41], coyotes [15,28,30,36,41], American badgers (Taxidea taxus) [15,28,30,36,41], bobcats (Lynx rufus) [28,36], prairie falcons (Falco mexicanus), ferruginous hawks (Buteo regalis) [28,30,36], and prairie rattlesnakes (Crotalus viridis) [36].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Preferred Habitat

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: cover, density, hibernation, litter, shrub

The black-footed ferret is apparently an obligate-dependent species (but see [58]), requiring white-tailed prairie dogs, black-tailed prairie dogs, or Gunnison's prairie dogs (Cynomys gunnisoni) for survival (see Food habits and Cover Requirements) [6,10,13,29,36,49,53,53,54,64].

The distribution, density, and potential for prairie dog colony expansion are important factors in identifying preferred habitat for black-footed ferrets [20,28]. Vegetation does not appear to have a direct influence on black-footed ferret distribution [20,28] and should not be considered an important factor when identifying suitable habitat for reintroduction [20].

Stand- and landscape-level habitat: As of 2007, the only wild population of black-footed ferrets occurs within 37 white-tailed prairie dog colonies in a grass/shrubsteppe vegetation community near Meeteetse, Wyoming (see Animal Distribution and Occurrence) [12,16,17,20,30]. Vegetation has been heavily grazed by domestic sheep, cattle, and horses for over 100 years [20]. Elevation ranges from 6,496 to 7,513 feet (1,980-2,290 m), and slopes do not exceed 30% [20,28]. Soils are shallow (1.6 feet (0.5 m)) [28], well-drained, and comprised of clay loams or clays derived from shale parent materials, which are ideal for prairie dog burrow construction. For more details on vegetation type and total percentage of cover, shrub density, topography, soils, climate, and geology near Meeteetse, Wyoming, see Collins and Lichvar [20] and Clark [13].

Black-footed ferrets cannot sustain their populations if prairie dog colonies are too small and the intercolony distance is too large [39]. In general, 1 black-footed ferret requires an area of 100 to 120 acres (40-49 ha) containing prairie dogs to survive [15,18,39]. To support 1 litter, approximately 99 to 148 acres (40-60 ha) of prairie dog habitat are required [18,28,30,38]; however, these numbers may vary depending on whether black-footed ferrets occupy white-tailed prairie dog colonies or black-tailed prairie dog colonies (see Food habits) [68].

In Mellette County, South Dakota, black-footed ferrets occupied black-tailed prairie dog colonies. Before the population disappeared, black-footed ferrets occupied 14 of 86 black-tailed prairie dog colonies, ranging from 20 to 35 acres (8-14 ha) in size. Four sites were located near creeks, 5 were in rolling grasslands, 4 were on flatlands, and 1 was located in a badland area [36].

Near Meeteetse, Wyoming, black-footed ferrets live within white-tailed prairie dog colonies, which range from 1.2 to 3,217.0 acres (0.5-1,302.0 ha) [28]. The mean distance between white-tailed prairie dog colonies is 0.57 miles (0.92 km) (range 0.08 to 2.30 miles (0.13-3.70 km)) [28,39,61]. The mean distance between white-tailed prairie dog colonies inhabited by black-footed ferrets is 3.4 miles (5.4 km) (range 0.6 to 6.9 miles (1.0-11.1 km)) [38].

Home range and density: Data are sparse on home range size for black-footed ferrets. Female black-footed ferrets have smaller home ranges than males. Home ranges of males may sometimes include the home ranges of several females [5,28,61]. Adult females usually occupy the same territory every year [53]. A female that was tracked for 4 months (December to March) occupied 39.5 acres (16.0 ha). Her territory was overlapped by a resident male that occupied 337.5 acres (136.6 ha) during the same period [28].

The average density of black-footed ferrets near Meeteetse, Wyoming, is estimated at 1 black-footed ferret /99 to148 acres (40-60 ha). As of 1985, 40 to 60 black-footed ferrets occupied a total of 6,178 to 7,413 acres (2,500-3,000 ha) of white-tailed prairie dog habitat [28,29,39].

Movement: From 1982 to 1984, the average year-round movement of 15 black-footed ferrets between white-tailed prairie dog colonies was 1.6 miles/night (2.5 km) ((SD 1.1 miles (1.7 km)) [28]. Movement of black-footed ferrets between prairie dog colonies is influenced by factors including breeding activity, season, sex, intraspecific territoriality, prey density, and expansion of home ranges with declining population density [5,12,28,30,61]. Movements of black-footed ferrets have been shown to increase during the breeding season [12,28]; however, snow-tracking from December to March over a 4-year period near Meeteetse, Wyoming revealed that factors other than breeding were responsible for movement distances [61]. One black-footed ferret (sex not given) near Meeteetse, Wyoming, traveled an average of 331 feet (101 m)/night prior to the breeding season and 19,370 feet (5,905 m)/night during the breeding season [12].

Temperature is positively correlated with distance of black-footed ferret movement [61]. Snow-tracking from December to March over a 4-year period near Meeteetse, Wyoming, revealed that movement distances were shortest during winter and longest between February and April, when black-footed ferrets were breeding and white-tailed prairie dogs emerged from hibernation. Nightly movement distance of 170 black-footed ferrets averaged 0.87 miles (1.41 km) (range 0.001 to 6.91 miles (0.002-11.12 km)). Nightly activity areas of black-footed ferrets ranged from 1.0 to 337.5 acres (0.4-136.6 ha), and were larger from February to March (x=110.2 acres (44.6 ha)) than from December to January (x=33.6 acres (13.6 ha)) [61]. Adult females establish activity areas based on access to food for rearing young. Males establish activity areas to maximize access to females, resulting in larger activity areas than those of females [61].

Prey density may account for movement distances. Black-footed ferrets may travel up to 11 miles (17 km) to seek prey, suggesting that they will interchange freely among white-tailed prairie dog colonies that are less than 11 miles apart [28]. In areas of high prey density, black-footed ferret movements were nonlinear in character, probably to avoid predators [61]. From December to March over a 4-year study period, black-footed ferrets investigated 68 white-tailed prairie dog holes per 1 mile (2 km) of travel/night. Distance traveled between white-tailed prairie dog burrows from December to March averaged 74.2 feet (22.6 m) (n=149 track routes)[61].

Population trends: Black-footed ferrets experience large population fluctuations that are determined by population density, prey availability, predation, and disease [30]. Populations are highest after kits first appear aboveground in summer [29,30]. A conservative minimum viable population size estimate for black-footed ferrets based on genetic considerations is 100 breeding individuals/12,360 acres (5,000 ha) [12,28,39] (see Management Considerations).

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Taxonomy

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
The currently accepted scientific name for the black-footed ferret is Mustela nigripes
Audubon and Bachman [2,32,77].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Timing of Major Life History Events

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: altricial, cover, litter

LIFE HISTORY:
Little is known about the life history, behavior, or ecology of black-footed ferrets due to their nocturnal and subterranean habits [29,37,49,53,61] and their rarity. Reproductive physiology of the black-footed ferret is similar to that of the European polecat (Mustela putorius) and the steppe polecat (Mustela eversmanii) [53].

Mating: Black-footed ferrets are probably polygynous, based on data collected from home range sizes, skewed sex ratios, and sexual dimorphism [5,28,30,61]. Mating occurs in February and March [15,61]. Unlike other mustelids, black-footed ferrets are habitat specialists and have low reproductive rates [8,30]. The sex ratio of adults near Meeteetse, Wyoming, was 1 male:2.2 females (n=128) [30].

Reproductive success: Reproductive success in the wild is unknown.

Gestation period and litter size: In captivity, gestation of black-footed ferrets lasts 42 to 45 days [8]. Litter size ranges from 1 to 5 kits [10,29,48]. In Mellette County, South Dakota, mean litter size was 3.4 kits (n=11) [48]. Near Meeteetse, Wyoming, mean litter size over a 4-year period was 3.3 kits (n=68) [30]. Kits are born in May and June [71] in prairie dog burrows (see Cover Requirements) [39].

Development: Kits are altricial and are raised by their mother for several months after birth [41,63]. Kits first emerge above ground in July, at 6 weeks old [30,36,71]. They are then separated into individual prairie dog burrows around their mother's burrow [36,53,63]. Kits reach adult weight and become independent several months following birth, from late August to October [5,30,36,63]. Sexual maturity occurs at 1 year old [36].

Social organization: Black-footed ferrets are solitary, except when breeding or raising litters [28,39,53,61,62].

Habits: Black-footed ferrets are primarily nocturnal [10,31,39,41]. They are most active above ground from dusk to midnight and 4 AM to midmorning [36]. Aboveground activity is greatest during late summer and early fall when juveniles become independent [5,36]. Climate generally does not limit black-footed ferret activity [36,61], but they may remain inactive inside burrows for up to 6 days at a time during winter [15].

Dispersal: Intercolony dispersal of juvenile black-footed ferrets occurs several months after birth, from early September to early November. Dispersal distances may be short or long. Near Meeteetse, Wyoming, 9 juvenile males and 3 juvenile females dispersed 1 to 4 miles (1-7 km) following litter breakup. Four juvenile females dispersed a short distance (<0.2 miles (0.3 km)) but remained on their natal area. One juvenile female remained on her mother's home range and reared a litter the following year in her mother's absence [30].

Mortality: Primary causes of mortality include habitat loss, human-introduced diseases, and indirect poisoning from prairie dog control [10,14,15,36,41,50,63,71]. Annual mortality of juvenile and adult black-footed ferrets over a 4-year period ranged from 59% to 83% (n=128) near Meeteetse, Wyoming [30]. During fall and winter, 50% to 70% of juveniles and older animals "disappear" due to emigration or death [28,29,30]. Average lifespan in the wild is probably only 1 year [29] but may be up to 5 years [4,41]. Males have higher rates of mortality than females due to longer dispersal distances when they are most vulnerable to predators [30].

Given an obligate-dependence of black-footed ferrets on prairie dogs (but see [58]), black-footed ferrets are extremely vulnerable to prairie dog habitat loss (see Preferred Habitat and Management Considerations) [53,54]. Habitat loss results from agriculture, livestock use, and other development [56,71].

Black-footed ferrets are susceptible to numerous diseases. They are fatally susceptible to canine distemper (Morbilivirus) [8,30,37], introduced by striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), common raccoons (Procyon lotor), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) [15,16], and American badgers (Taxidea taxus) [15]. A short-term vaccine for canine distemper is available for captive black-footed ferrets, but no protection is available for young born in the wild [8,31]. Other diseases that black-footed ferrets are susceptible to include rabies, tularemia, and human influenza [41]. Sylvatic plague (Yersinia pestis) probably does not directly affect black-footed ferrets, but epidemics in prairie dog towns may completely destroy the black-footed ferrets' prey base (see Food habits) [19,30,41,50,63].

license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

U.S. Federal Legal Status

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
The black-footed ferret is listed as Endangered throughout its its range except in portions of Arizona, Colorado, Montana, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming, where it is listed as an Experimental Population, Non-Essential [70].
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Use of Fire in Population Management

provided by Fire Effects Information System Animals
More info for the terms: fire severity, fire use, severity

Data on black-footed ferrets and fire do not currently exist, and data on prairie dog's response to fire are sparse. Fire may or may not be beneficial to black-tailed prairie dogs, depending on fire severity and season [24,25,35,42,43,44,57,67,76]. Due to the black-footed ferret's reliance on prairie dogs, fire will most likely affect the 2 species similarly. An FEIS review on the black-tailed prairie dog's response to fire may be helpful in determining fire use in areas occupied by black-footed ferrets (see black-tailed prairie dog).
license
cc-publicdomain
bibliographic citation
Ulev, Elena 2007. Mustela nigripes. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/animals/mammal/muni/all.html

Black-footed ferret

provided by wikipedia EN

The black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), also known as the American polecat[2] or prairie dog hunter,[3] is a species of mustelid native to central North America.

The black-footed ferret is roughly the size of a mink and is similar in appearance to the European polecat and the Asian steppe polecat. It is largely nocturnal and solitary, except when breeding or raising litters.[4][5] Up to 90% of its diet is composed of prairie dogs.[6][7]

The species declined throughout the 20th century, primarily as a result of decreases in prairie dog populations and sylvatic plague. It was declared extinct in 1979, but a residual wild population was discovered in Meeteetse, Wyoming in 1981.[8] A captive-breeding program launched by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service resulted in its reintroduction into eight western US states, Canada, and Mexico from 1991 to 2009. As of 2015, over 200 mature individuals are in the wild across 18 populations, with four self-sustaining populations in South Dakota, Arizona, and Wyoming.[1][9] It was first listed as "endangered" in 1982, then listed as "extinct in the wild" in 1996 before being upgraded back to "endangered" in the IUCN Red List in 2008.[1] In February 2021, the first successful clone of a black-footed ferret, a female named Elizabeth Ann, was introduced to the public.[10]

Evolution

Like its close relative, the Asian steppe polecat (with which it was once thought to be conspecific), the black-footed ferret represents a more progressive form than the European polecat in the direction of carnivory.[2] The black-footed ferret's most likely ancestor was Mustela stromeri (from which the European and steppe polecats are also derived), which originated in Europe during the Middle Pleistocene.[11] Molecular evidence indicates that the steppe polecat and black-footed ferret diverged from M. stromeri between 500,000 and 2,000,000 years ago, perhaps in Beringia. The species appeared in the Great Basin and the Rockies by 750,000 years ago. The oldest recorded fossil find originates from Cathedral Cave, White Pine County, Nevada, and dates back 750,000 to 950,000 years ago.[12] Prairie dog fossils have been found in six sites that yield ferrets, thus indicating that the association between the two species is an old one.[13] Anecdotal observations and 42% of examined fossil records indicated that any substantial colony of medium- to large-sized colonial ground squirrels, such as Richardson's ground squirrels, may provide a sufficient prey base and a source of burrows for black-footed ferrets. This suggests that the black-footed ferret and prairie dogs did not historically have an obligate predator–prey relationship.[12] The species has likely always been rare, and the modern black-footed ferret represents a relict population. A reported occurrence of the species is from a late Illinoian deposit in Clay County, Nebraska, and it is further recorded from Sangamonian deposits in Nebraska and Medicine Hat, Alberta. Fossils have also been found in Alaska dating from the Pleistocene.[13][11]

Description

Skull, as illustrated in Merriam's Synopsis of the weasels of North America
Black-footed ferret at the Louisville Zoo

The black-footed ferret has a long, slender body with black outlines on its paws, ears, parts of its face and its tail. The forehead is arched and broad, and the muzzle is short. It has few whiskers, and its ears are triangular, short, erect and broad at the base. The neck is long and the legs short and stout. The toes are armed with sharp, very slightly arched claws. The feet on both surfaces are covered in hair, even to the soles, thus concealing the claws.[14] It combines several physical features common in both members of the subgenus Gale (least and short-tailed weasels) and Putorius (European and steppe polecats). Its skull resembles that of polecats in its size, massiveness and the development of its ridges and depressions, though it is distinguished by the extreme degree of constriction behind the orbits where the width of the cranium is much less than that of the muzzle.

Although similar in size to polecats, its attenuate body, long neck, very short legs, slim tail, large orbicular ears and close-set pelage is much closer in conformation to weasels and stoats.[15] The dentition of the black-footed ferret closely resembles that of the European and steppe polecat, though the back lower molar is vestigial, with a hemispherical crown which is too small and weak to develop the little cusps which are more apparent in polecats.[15] It differs from the European polecat by the greater contrast between its dark limbs and pale body and the shorter length of its black tail-tip. In contrast, differences from the steppe polecat of Asia are slight, to the point where the two species were once thought to be conspecific.[13] The only noticeable differences between the black-footed ferret and the steppe polecat are the former's much shorter and coarser fur, larger ears, and longer post molar extension of the palate.[16]

Males measure 500–533 millimetres (19.7–21.0 in) in body length and 114–127 millimetres (4.5–5.0 in) in tail length, thus constituting 22–25% of its body length. Females are typically 10% smaller than males.[13] It weighs 650–1,400 grams (1.43–3.09 lb).[17] Captive-bred ferrets used for the reintroduction projects were found to be smaller than their wild counterparts, though these animals rapidly attained historical body sizes once released.[18]

The base color is pale yellowish or buffy above and below. The top of the head and sometimes the neck is clouded by dark-tipped hairs. The face is crossed by a broad band of sooty black, which includes the eyes. The feet, lower parts of the legs, the tip of the tail and the preputial region are sooty-black. The area midway between the front and back legs is marked by a large patch of dark umber-brown, which fades into the buffy surrounding parts. A small spot occurs over each eye, with a narrow band behind the black mask. The sides of the head and the ears are dirty-white in color.[16]

Behavior and ecology

Territorial behavior

Black-footed ferret performing a weasel war dance

The black-footed ferret is solitary, except when breeding or raising litters.[4][5] It is nocturnal[4][19] and primarily hunts for sleeping prairie dogs in their burrows.[20] It is most active above ground from dusk to midnight and 4 am to mid-morning.[7] Aboveground activity is greatest during late summer and early autumn when juveniles become independent.[7] Climate generally does not limit black-footed ferret activity,[5][7] but it may remain inactive inside burrows for up to 6 days at a time during winter.[21]

Female black-footed ferrets have smaller home ranges than males. Home ranges of males may sometimes include the home ranges of several females.[5] Adult females usually occupy the same territory every year. A female that was tracked from December to March occupied 39.5 acres (16 ha). Her territory was overlapped by a resident male that occupied 337.5 acres (137 ha) during the same period. The average density of black-footed ferrets near Meeteetse, Wyoming, is estimated at one black-footed ferret to 148 acres (60 ha). As of 1985, 40 to 60 black-footed ferrets occupied a total of 6,178 to 7,413 acres (2,500 to 3,000 ha) of white-tailed prairie dog habitat.[4] From 1982 to 1984, the average year-round movement of 15 black-footed ferrets between white-tailed prairie dog colonies was 1.6 miles/night (2.5 km) (with a spread of 1.1 miles or 1.7 km). Movement of black-footed ferrets between prairie dog colonies is influenced by factors including breeding activity, season, sex, intraspecific territoriality, prey density, and expansion of home ranges with declining population density.[5][22] Movements of black-footed ferrets have been shown to increase during the breeding season; however, snow-tracking from December to March over a 4-year period near Meeteetse, Wyoming revealed that factors other than breeding were responsible for movement distances.[5]

Temperature is positively correlated with distance of black-footed ferret movement.[5] Snow-tracking from December to March over a 4-year period near Meeteetse, Wyoming, revealed that movement distances were shortest during winter and longest between February and April, when black-footed ferrets were breeding and white-tailed prairie dogs emerged from hibernation. Nightly movement distance of 170 black-footed ferrets averaged 0.87 miles (1.40 km) (range 0.001 to 6.91 miles (0.0016 to 11.1206 kilometres)). Nightly activity areas of black-footed ferrets ranged from 1 to 337.5 acres (0 to 137 ha)), and were larger from February to March (110.2 acres (45 ha)) than from December to January (33.6 acres (14 ha)).[5] Adult females establish activity areas based on access to food for rearing young. Males establish activity areas to maximize access to females, resulting in larger activity areas than those of females.[5]

Prey density may account for movement distances. Black-footed ferrets may travel up to 11 miles (18 km) to seek prey, suggesting that they will interchange freely among white-tailed prairie dog colonies that are less than 11 miles (18 km) apart. In areas of high prey density, black-footed ferret movements were nonlinear in character, probably to avoid predators.[5] From December to March over a 4-year study period, black-footed ferrets investigated 68 white-tailed prairie dog holes per 1 mile (1.6 km) of travel/night. Distance traveled between white-tailed prairie dog burrows from December to March averaged 74.2 feet (22.6 m) over 149 track routes.[5]

Reproduction and development

Black-footed ferret kits

The reproductive physiology of the black-footed ferret is similar to that of the European polecat and the steppe polecat. It is probably polygynous, based on data collected from home range sizes, skewed sex ratios, and sexual dimorphism.[5][22] Mating occurs in February and March.[5][21] When a male and female in estrus encounter each other, the male sniffs the genital region of the female, but does not mount her until after a few hours have elapsed, which is contrast to the more violent behavior displayed by the male European polecat. During copulation, the male grasps the female by the nape of the neck, with the copulatory tie lasting from 1.5 to 3.0 hours.[13] Unlike other mustelids, the black-footed ferret is a habitat specialist with low reproductive rates.[22] In captivity, gestation of black-footed ferrets lasts 42–45 days. Litter size ranges from one to five kits.[19] Kits are born in May and June[23] in prairie dog burrows.[4] Kits are altricial and are raised by their mother for several months after birth. Kits first emerge above ground in July, at 6 weeks old.[7][22][23] They are then separated into individual prairie dog burrows around their mother's burrow.[7] Kits reach adult weight and become independent several months following birth, from late August to October.[7][22] Sexual maturity occurs at the age of one year.[7]

Intercolony dispersal of juvenile black-footed ferrets occurs several months after birth, from early September to early November. Dispersal distances may be short or long. Near Meeteetse, Wyoming, 9 juvenile males and three juvenile females dispersed 1 to 4 mi (1.6 to 6.4 km) following litter breakup. Four juvenile females dispersed a short distance (<0.2 mi (0.32 km)), but remained on their natal area.[22]

Diet

Black-footed ferret chasing prairie dog

Up to 90% of the black-footed ferret's diet is composed of prairie dogs.[6][7] The remaining 10% of their diet is composed of small rodents, and Lagomorphs.[24] Their diet varies depending on geographic location. In western Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and Montana, black-footed ferrets are historically associated with white-tailed prairie dogs and were forced to find alternative prey when white-tailed prairie dogs entered their four-month hibernation cycle.[19] In Wyoming, alternative prey items consumed during white-tailed prairie dog hibernation included voles (Microtus spp.) and mice (Peromyscus and Mus spp.) found near streams. In South Dakota, black-footed ferrets associate with black-tailed prairie dogs. Because black-tailed prairie dogs do not hibernate, little seasonal change in black-footed ferret diet is necessary.[5][19]

Skeletons of black-footed ferret (left) and prairie dog (right) articulated to show the predator-prey relationship between the two. (Museum of Osteology)

In Mellette County, South Dakota, black-tailed prairie dog remains occurred in 91% of 82 black-footed ferret scats. Mouse remains occurred in 26% of scats. Mouse remains could not be identified to species; however, deer mice, northern grasshopper mice, and house mice were captured in snap-trap surveys. Potential prey items included thirteen-lined ground squirrels, plains pocket gophers, mountain cottontails, upland sandpipers, horned larks, and western meadowlarks.[7]

Based on 86 black-footed ferret scats found near Meeteetse, Wyoming, 87% of their diet was composed of white-tailed prairie dogs. Other food items included deer mice, sagebrush voles, meadow voles, mountain cottontails, and white-tailed jackrabbits. Water is obtained through consumption of prey.[4]

A study published in 1983 modeling metabolizable energy requirements estimated that one adult female black-footed ferret and her litter require about 474 to 1,421 black-tailed prairie dogs per year or 412 to 1,236 white-tailed prairie dogs per year for sustenance. They concluded that this dietary requirement would require protection of 91 to 235 acres (37 to 95 ha) of black-tailed prairie dog habitat or 413 to 877 acres (167 to 355 ha) of white-tailed prairie dog habitat for each female black-footed ferret with a litter.[25]

Distribution and habitat

Head of a black-footed ferret by Carol Snow, 1972

The historical range of the black-footed ferret was closely correlated with, but not restricted to, the range of prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.). Its range extended from southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan south to Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona.[13] As of 2007, the only known wild black-footed ferret population was located on approximately 6,000 acres (2,400 hectares) in the western Big Horn Basin near Meeteetse, Wyoming.[4][5][6][21][22] Since 1990, black-footed ferrets have been reintroduced to the following sites: Shirley Basin, Wyoming; UL Bend National Wildlife Refuge and Fort Belknap Indian Reservation, Montana; Conata Basin/Badlands, Buffalo Gap National Grassland, and the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation in South Dakota; Aubrey Valley, Arizona; Rocky Mountain Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge and Wolf Creek in Colorado; Coyote Basin, straddling Colorado and Utah, northern Chihuahua, Mexico,[23] and Grasslands National Park, Canada [26]

Historical habitats of the black-footed ferret included shortgrass prairie, mixed-grass prairie, desert grassland, shrub steppe, sagebrush steppe,[22] mountain grassland, and semi-arid grassland.[13] Black-footed ferrets use prairie dog burrows for raising young, avoiding predators, and thermal cover.[4][7] Six black-footed ferret nests found near Mellette County, South Dakota, were lined with buffalo grass, prairie threeawn, sixweeks grass, and cheatgrass. High densities of prairie dog burrows provide the greatest amount of cover for black-footed ferrets.[4][5] Black-tailed prairie dog colonies contain a greater burrow density per acre than white-tailed prairie dog colonies, and may be more suitable for the recovery of black-footed ferrets.[4] The type of prairie dog burrow may be important for occupancy by black-footed ferrets. Black-footed ferret litters near Meeteetse, Wyoming, were associated with mounded white-tailed prairie dog burrows, which are less common than non-mounded burrows. Mounded burrows contain multiple entrances and probably have a deep and extensive burrow system that protects kits.[4] However, black-footed ferrets used non-mounded prairie dog burrows (64%) more often than mounded burrows (30%) near Meeteetse, Wyoming.[5]

Mortality

Primary causes of mortality include habitat loss, human-introduced diseases, and indirect poisoning from prairie dog control measures.[7][19][21][23] Annual mortality of juvenile and adult black-footed ferrets over a 4-year period ranged from 59 to 83% (128 individuals) near Meeteetse, Wyoming.[22] During fall and winter, 50 to 70% of juveniles and older animals perish.[22] Average lifespan in the wild is probably only one year, but may be up to five years. Males have higher rates of mortality than females because of longer dispersal distances when they are most vulnerable to predators.[22]

Given an obligate dependence of black-footed ferrets on prairie dogs, black-footed ferrets are extremely vulnerable to prairie dog habitat loss. Habitat loss results from agriculture, livestock use, and other development.[23]

Black-footed ferrets are susceptible to numerous diseases. They are fatally susceptible to canine distemper virus,[13][22] introduced by striped skunks, common raccoons, red foxes, coyotes, and American badgers.[21] A short-term vaccine for canine distemper is available for captive black-footed ferrets, but no protection is available for young born in the wild. Black-footed ferrets are also susceptible to rabies, tularemia, and human influenza. They can directly contract sylvatic plague (Yersinia pestis), and epidemics in prairie dog towns may completely destroy the ferrets' prey base.[27]

Predators of black-footed ferrets include golden eagles, great horned owls, coyotes, American badgers, bobcats, prairie falcons, ferruginous hawks, and prairie rattlesnakes.[7][21][22]

Oil and natural gas exploration and extraction can have detrimental impacts on prairie dogs and black-footed ferrets. Seismic activity collapses prairie dog burrows. Other problems include potential leaks and spills, increased roads and fences, increased vehicle traffic and human presence, and an increased number of raptor perching sites on power poles. Traps set for coyotes, American mink, and other animals may harm black-footed ferrets.[6]

History

Native American tribes, including the Crow, Blackfoot, Sioux, Cheyenne, and Pawnee, used black-footed ferrets for religious rites and for food.[19] The species was not encountered during the Lewis and Clark Expedition, nor was it seen by Nuttall or Townsend, and it did not become known to modern science until it was first described in John James Audubon and John Bachman's Viviparous Quadrupeds of North America in 1851.[28]

It is with great pleasure that we introduce this handsome new species; ... [it] inhabits the wooded parts of the country to the Rocky Mountains, and perhaps is found beyond that range... When we consider the very rapid manner in which every expedition that has crossed the Rocky Mountains, has been pushed forward, we cannot wonder that many species have been entirely overlooked... The habits of this species resemble, as far as we have learned, those of [the European polecat]. It feeds on birds, small reptiles and animals, eggs, and various insects, and is a bold and cunning foe to the rabbits, hares, grouse, and other game of our western regions.

— Audubon and Bachman (1851)[28]

Decline

For a time, the black-footed ferret was harvested for the fur trade, with the American Fur Company having received 86 ferret skins from Pratt, Chouteau, and Company of St. Louis in the late 1830s. During the early years of predator control, black-footed ferret carcasses were likely discarded, as their fur was of low value. This likely continued after the passing of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, for fear of reprisals. The large drop in black-footed ferret numbers began during the 1800s through to the 1900s, as prairie dog numbers declined because of control programs and the conversion of prairies to croplands.[29]

Sylvatic plague, a disease caused by Yersinia pestis introduced into North America, also contributed to the prairie dog die-off, though ferret numbers declined proportionately more than their prey, thus indicating other factors may have been responsible. Plague was first detected in South Dakota in a coyote in 2004, and then in about 50,000 acres (20,000 ha) of prairie dogs on Pine Ridge Reservation in 2005. Thereafter 7,000 acres (2,800 ha) of prairie dog colonies were treated with insecticide (DeltaDust) and 1,000 acres (400 ha) of black-footed ferret habitat were prophylactically dusted in Conata Basin in 2006–2007. Nevertheless, plague was proven in ferrets in May 2008. Since then each year 12,000 acres (4,900 ha) of their Conata Basin habitat is dusted and about 50–150 ferrets are immunized with plague vaccine.[30] Ferrets are unlikely to persist through plague episodes unless there are management efforts that allow access to prey resources at a wider region or actions that could substantially reduce the plague transmission.[31] Implementing efforts to conserve large prairie dog landscapes and plague mitigation tools are very important in conserving the black-footed ferrets' population.[31]

Inbreeding depression may have also contributed to the decline, as studies on black-footed ferrets from Meeteetse, Wyoming revealed low levels of genetic variation. Canine distemper devastated the Meeteetse ferret population in 1985. A live virus vaccine originally made for domestic ferrets killed large numbers of black-footed ferrets, thus indicating that the species is especially susceptible to distemper.[17]

Reintroduction and conservation

Ferret in the wild, July 2008, Conata Basin, South Dakota

The black‐footed ferret experienced a recent population bottleneck in the wild followed by a more than 30-year recovery through ex situ breeding and then reintroduction into its native range. As such, this sole endemic North American ferret allows examining the impact of a severe genetic restriction on subsequent biological form and function, especially on reproductive traits and success. The black‐footed ferret was listed as endangered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1967. Declared extinct in 1979, a residual wild population was discovered in Meeteetse, Wyoming, in 1981. This cohort eventually grew to 130 individuals and was then nearly extirpated by sylvatic plague, Yersinia pestis, and canine distemper virus, Canine morbillivirus, with eventually 18 animals remaining.[32] These survivors were captured from 1985 to 1987 to serve as the foundation for the black‐footed ferret ex situ breeding program. Seven of those 18 animals produced offspring that survived and reproduced, and with currently living descendants, are the ancestors of all black‐footed ferrets now in the ex situ (about 320) and in situ (about 300) populations.[33]

The black-footed ferret is an example of a species that benefits from strong reproductive science.[34] A captive-breeding program was initiated in 1987, capturing 18 living individuals and using artificial insemination. This is one of the first examples of assisted reproduction contributing to conservation of an endangered species in nature.[34] The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, state and tribal agencies, private landowners, conservation groups, and North American zoos have actively reintroduced ferrets back into the wild since 1991. Beginning in Shirley Basin[35] in Eastern Wyoming, reintroduction expanded to Montana, 6 sites in South Dakota in 1994, Arizona, Utah, Colorado, Saskatchewan, Canada and Chihuahua, Mexico. The Toronto Zoo has bred hundreds, most of which were released into the wild.[36] Several episodes of Zoo Diaries show aspects of the tightly controlled breeding. In May 2000, the Canadian Species at Risk Act listed the black-footed ferret as being an extirpated species in Canada.[37] A population of 35 animals was released into Grasslands National Park in southern Saskatchewan on October 2, 2009,[38] and a litter of newborn kits was observed in July 2010.[39] Reintroduction sites have experienced multiple years of reproduction from released individuals.

Ferret kit at the National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Colorado

The black-footed ferret was first listed as endangered in 1967 under the Endangered Species Preservation Act, and was re-listed on January 4, 1974, under the Endangered Species Act. In September 2006, South Dakota's ferret population was estimated to be around 420, with 250 (100 breeding adults consisting of 67 females and 33 males) in Eagle Butte, South Dakota, which is 100,000 acres (40,000 ha), less than 3% of the public grasslands in South Dakota, 70 miles (110 km) east of Rapid City, South Dakota, in the Buffalo Gap National Grassland bordering Badlands National Park, 130 ferrets northeast of Eagle Butte, SD, on Cheyenne River Indian Reservation, and about 40 ferrets on the Rosebud Indian Reservation.[40] Arizona's Aubrey Valley ferret population was well over 100 and a second reintroduction site with around 50 animals is used. An August 2007 report in the journal Science counted a population of 223 in one area of Wyoming (the original number of reintroduced ferrets, most of which died, was 228), and an annual growth rate of 35% from 2003 to 2006 was estimated.[41][42] This rate of recovery is much faster than for many endangered species, and the ferret seems to have prevailed over the previous problems of disease and prey shortage that hampered its improvement.[42] As of 2007, the total wild population of black-footed ferrets in the U.S. was well over 650 individuals, plus 250 in captivity. In 2008, the IUCN reclassified the species as "globally endangered", a substantial improvement since the 1996 assessment, when it was considered extinct in the wild, as the species was indeed only surviving in captivity. In 2016, NatureServe considered the species Critically Imperiled.[43]

As of 2013, about 1,200 ferrets are thought to live in the wild.[44] These wild populations are possible due to the extensive breeding program that releases surplus animals to reintroduction sites, which are then monitored by USFWS biologists for health and growth. However, the species cannot depend just on ex situ breeding for future survival, as reproductive traits such as pregnancy rate and normal sperm motility and morphology have been steadily declining with time in captivity.[45] These declining markers of individual and population health are thought to be due to increased inbreeding, an occurrence often found with small populations or ones that spend a long time in captivity.[46][47]

Conservation efforts have been opposed by stock growers and ranchers, who have traditionally fought prairie dogs. In 2005, the U.S. Forest Service began poisoning prairie dogs in private land buffer zones of the Conata Basin of Buffalo Gap National Grassland. Because 10–15 ranchers complained the measure was inadequate, the forest service advised by Mark Rey, then Undersecretary of Agriculture, expanded its "prairie-dog management" in September 2006 to all of South Dakota's Buffalo Gap and the Fort Pierre National Grassland, and also to the Oglala National Grassland in Nebraska, against opinions of biologists in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Following exposure by conservation groups including the Climate, Community & Biodiversity Alliance and national media[48] public outcry and a lawsuit mobilized federal officials, and the poisoning plan was revoked.

Elizabeth Ann, the first cloned black-footed ferret and first-ever cloned U.S. endangered species, 54-days old

The contradictory mandates of the two federal agencies involved, the USFWS and the U.S. Forest Service, are exemplified in what the Rosebud Sioux tribe experienced: The ferret was reintroduced by the USFWS, which according to the tribe promised to pay more than $1 million a year through 2010. On the other hand, the tribe was also contracted for the U.S. Forest Service prairie dog poisoning program. The increasing numbers of ferrets led to conflicts between the tribe's Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Game, Fish and Parks Department and the Tribal Land Enterprise Organization. When the federal government started an investigation of the tribe's prairie dog management program, threatening to prosecute tribal employees or agents carrying out the management plan in the ferret reintroduction area, the tribal council passed a resolution in 2008, asking the two federal agencies to remove ferrets, and reimburse the tribe for its expenses for the ferret recovery program.[49]

Employees of the San Diego Zoo, the conservation organization Revive & Restore, the ViaGen Pets and Equine Company and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have teamed up to clone a black-footed ferret. In 2020, a team of scientists cloned a female named Willa, who died in the mid-1980s and left no living descendants. Her clone, a female named Elizabeth Ann, was born on December 10, 2020, making her the first North American endangered species to be cloned.[10] Scientists hope that the contribution of this individual will alleviate the effects of inbreeding and help black-footed ferrets better cope with plague. Experts estimate that this female's genome contains three times as much genetic diversity as any of the modern black-footed ferrets.[50]

In the year 2020, black-footed ferrets[51] were used to test an experimental COVID-19 vaccine in Colorado.[52]

In popular culture

In 2023, the black-footed ferret was featured on a United States Postal Service Forever stamp as part of the Endangered Species set, based on a photograph from Joel Sartore's Photo Ark. The stamp was dedicated at a ceremony at the National Grasslands Visitor Center in Wall, South Dakota.[53]

References

Notes

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from Mustela nigripes. United States Department of Agriculture.

  1. ^ a b c d Belant, J.; Biggins, D.; Garelle, D.; Griebel, R.G. & Hughes, J.P. (2015). "Mustela nigripes". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2015: e.T14020A45200314. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T14020A45200314.en. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  2. ^ a b Heptner, V. G. (Vladimir Georgievich); Nasimovich, A. A; Bannikov, Andrei Grigorovich; Hoffmann, Robert S. (2001). Mammals of the Soviet Union Volume: v. 2, pt. 1b. Washington, D.C. : Smithsonian Institution Libraries and National Science Foundation.
  3. ^ Coues 1877, p. 151
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Houston, B. R.; Clark, Tim W.; Minta, S. C. (1986). "Habitat suitability index model for the black-footed ferret: a method to locate transplant sites". Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs. 8: 99–114.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Richardson, Louise; Clark, Tim W.; Forrest, Steven C.; Campbell, Thomas M. (1987). "Winter ecology of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes) at Meeteetse, Wyoming". The American Midland Naturalist. 117 (2): 225–239. doi:10.2307/2425964. JSTOR 2425964.
  6. ^ a b c d Clark, Tim W. (1986). "Some guidelines for management of the black-footed ferret". Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs. 8: 160–168. JSTOR 23377649.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Hillman, Conrad N. 1968. Life history and ecology of the black-footed ferret in the wild. Brookings, SD: South Dakota State University. Thesis
  8. ^ "Timeline". Blackfootedferret.org. Black-footed Ferret Recovery Implementation Team. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  9. ^ McLendon, R. (2011). "Rare U.S. ferret marks 30-year comeback". Mother Nature Network. Archived from the original on May 9, 2015. Retrieved October 9, 2011.
  10. ^ a b "Elizabeth Ann the Black-Footed Ferret Is the First-Ever Cloned Endangered U.S. Species". PEOPLE. Retrieved February 21, 2021.
  11. ^ a b Kurtén 1980, pp. 152–153
  12. ^ a b Owen, Pamela R.; Bell, Christopher J. (2000). "Fossils, diet, and conservation of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes)". Journal of Mammalogy. 81 (2): 422. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0422:FDACOB>2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 1383400. S2CID 85863751.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h Hillman, Conrad N.; Clark, Tim W. (1980). "Mustela nigripes". Mammalian Species (126): 1–3. doi:10.2307/3503892. JSTOR 3503892.
  14. ^ Audubon & Bachman 1851, p. 297
  15. ^ a b Coues 1877, pp. 147–148
  16. ^ a b Merriam 1896, p. 8
  17. ^ a b Biggins, Dean E. and Max H. Schroeder. (1988). Historical and present status of the black-footed ferret. pp. 9397. In Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop, USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rpt. RM-154, Rapid City, South Dakota.
  18. ^ Wisely, Samantha M.; Santymire, Rachel M.; Livieri, Travis M.; Marinari, Paul E.; Kreeger, Julie S.; Wildt, David E.; Howard, Jogayle (2005). "Environment influences morphology and development for in situ and ex situ populations of the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes)" (PDF). Animal Conservation. 8 (3): 321–328. doi:10.1017/S1367943005002283. S2CID 49366571.
  19. ^ a b c d e f Clark, Tim W. (1976). "The black-footed ferret". Oryx. 13 (3): 275–280. doi:10.1017/S0030605300013727.
  20. ^ "Black-Footed Ferret (Mustela nigripes)". National Parks Conservation Association. Archived from the original on January 10, 2010. Retrieved June 14, 2010.
  21. ^ a b c d e f Clark, Tim W. (1987). "Restoring balance between the endangered black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) and human use of the Great Plains and Intermountain West" (PDF). Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences. 77 (4): 168–173. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 6, 2013. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
  22. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Forrest, Steven C.; Biggins, Dean E.; Richardson, Louise; Clark, Tim W.; Campbell, Thomas M., III; Fagerstone, Kathleen A.; Thorne, E. (1988). "Population attributes for the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) at Meeteetse, Wyoming, 1981–1985". Journal of Mammalogy. 69 (2): 261–273. doi:10.2307/1381377. JSTOR 1381377.
  23. ^ a b c d e U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1988). Species account: Black-footed ferret—Mustela nigripes, In: Endangered Species Program. Pierre, SD: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Mountain-Prairie Region, South Dakota Ecological Services Field Office
  24. ^ Antonelli, T.S.; Leischner, C.L.; Ososky, J.J.; Hartstone-Rose, A. (January 2016). "The effect of captivity on the oral health of the critically endangered black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes)". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 94 (1): 15–22. doi:10.1139/cjz-2015-0135. hdl:1807/70615.
  25. ^ Stromberg, Mark R.; Rayburn, R. Lee; Clark, Tim W. (1983). "Black-footed ferret prey requirements: an energy balance estimate". Journal of Wildlife Management. 47 (1): 67–73. doi:10.2307/3808053. JSTOR 3808053.
  26. ^ Parks Canada Agency, Government of Canada. "Black-footed Ferret. Frequently Asked Questions". www.pc.gc.ca. Archived from the original on February 8, 2013.
  27. ^ Williams, E.S.; D.R. Kwiatkowski; E.T. Thorne & A. Boerger-Fields (1994). "Plague in a black-footed ferret" (PDF). Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 30 (4): 581–5. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-30.4.581. PMID 7760495. S2CID 19203496.
  28. ^ a b Audubon & Bachman 1851, pp. 298–299
  29. ^ Delgado, Anton L. (August 4, 2021). "Black-footed ferrets were nearly extinct. Here's how landowners want to help bring them back". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
  30. ^ Livieri T.M. (April 28, 2013). Assessing the risk of plague to black-footed ferrets in Conata Basin, South Dakota. Final Report to South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks, 2012 Wildlife Diversity Grant.
  31. ^ a b Shoemaker, Kevin T.; Lacy, Robert C.; Verant, Michelle L.; Brook, Barry W.; Livieri, Travis M.; Miller, Philip S.; Fordham, Damien A.; Akçakaya, H. Resit (2014). "Effects of prey metapopulation structure on the viability of black-footed ferrets in plague-impacted landscapes: a metamodelling approach". Journal of Applied Ecology. 51 (3): 735–745. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12223.
  32. ^ Fritts, Rachel (September 7, 2020). "An invisible enemy: the battle to save black-footed ferrets from the plague". The Guardian. Retrieved August 6, 2021.
  33. ^ Santymire, R. M.; Lonsdorf, E. V.; Lynch, C. M.; Wildt, D. E.; Marinari, P. E.; Kreeger, J. S.; Howard, J. G. (2019). "Inbreeding causes decreased seminal quality affecting pregnancy and litter size in the endangered black-footed ferret". Animal Conservation. 22 (4): 331–340. doi:10.1111/acv.12466.
  34. ^ a b Wildt, David E.; Wemmer, Christen (July 1999). "Sex and wildlife: the role of reproductive science in conservation". Biodiversity and Conservation. 8 (7): 965–976. doi:10.1023/A:1008813532763. S2CID 25528029.
  35. ^ "Black-footed Ferret Recovery – A Timeline". blackfootedferret.org.
  36. ^ "Toronto Zoo> Conservation> Mammals". Retrieved September 5, 2015.
  37. ^ "Species at Risk – Black-footed Ferret". Environment Canada. May 8, 2006. Archived from the original on March 31, 2017. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
  38. ^ "Black-footed ferret back on prairie turf". Parks Canada. October 2, 2009. Retrieved September 5, 2015.
  39. ^ "Black-footed ferrets breeding in Sask". CBC News. August 4, 2010. Retrieved August 5, 2010.
  40. ^ Harlan, Bill (September 24, 2006)."South Dakota a ferret focal point". Rapid City Journal.
  41. ^ Fox, Maggie (August 9, 2007). "Once rare black-footed ferrets make comeback". Reuters. Retrieved October 2, 2009.
  42. ^ a b Fountain, Henry (August 14, 2007). "Call It a Comeback: Ferret Population Shows Big Growth in Wyoming". The New York Times. Retrieved October 2, 2009.
  43. ^ "NatureServe Explorer 2.0". explorer.natureserve.org. Retrieved November 1, 2022.
  44. ^ "Black footed Ferret". Defenders magazine, Fall 2013, 88 (4): 22.
  45. ^ Santymire, R. M.; Lonsdorf, E. V.; Lynch, C. M.; Wildt, D. E.; Marinari, P. E.; Kreeger, J. S.; Howard, J. G. (2019). "Inbreeding causes decreased seminal quality affecting pregnancy and litter size in the endangered black-footed ferret". Animal Conservation. 22 (4): 331–340. doi:10.1111/acv.12466.
  46. ^ Roelke, Melody E.; Martenson, Janice S.; O'Brien, Stephen J. (June 1, 1993). "The consequences of demographic reduction and genetic depletion in the endangered Florida panther". Current Biology. 3 (6): 340–350. doi:10.1016/0960-9822(93)90197-V. PMID 15335727. S2CID 40900753.
  47. ^ O'Brien, S. J.; Roelke, M. E.; Marker, L.; Newman, A.; Winkler, C. A.; Meltzer, D.; Colly, L.; Evermann, J. F.; Bush, M.; Wildt, D. E. (March 22, 1985). "Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah". Science. 227 (4693): 1428–1434. Bibcode:1985Sci...227.1428O. doi:10.1126/science.2983425. PMID 2983425.
  48. ^ CNN Broken government series "Scorched Earth". February 21, 2008
  49. ^ Rosebud tribe tells feds to remove ferrets Archived December 14, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Aberdeen News, March 14, 2008
  50. ^ "A black-footed ferret has been cloned, a first for a U.S. endangered species". National Geographic. February 18, 2021. Retrieved February 21, 2021.
  51. ^ Pappas-Live, Stephanie (January 2021). "Endangered ferrets get experimental COVID-19 vaccine". livescience.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  52. ^ "Endangered ferrets get experimental COVID-19 vaccine in Colorado". KUSA.com. December 29, 2020. Archived from the original on January 5, 2022. Retrieved January 3, 2021.
  53. ^ "Postal Service Spotlights Endangered Species". United States Postal Service. April 19, 2023. Retrieved May 11, 2023.

Bibliography

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN

Black-footed ferret: Brief Summary

provided by wikipedia EN

The black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), also known as the American polecat or prairie dog hunter, is a species of mustelid native to central North America.

The black-footed ferret is roughly the size of a mink and is similar in appearance to the European polecat and the Asian steppe polecat. It is largely nocturnal and solitary, except when breeding or raising litters. Up to 90% of its diet is composed of prairie dogs.

The species declined throughout the 20th century, primarily as a result of decreases in prairie dog populations and sylvatic plague. It was declared extinct in 1979, but a residual wild population was discovered in Meeteetse, Wyoming in 1981. A captive-breeding program launched by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service resulted in its reintroduction into eight western US states, Canada, and Mexico from 1991 to 2009. As of 2015, over 200 mature individuals are in the wild across 18 populations, with four self-sustaining populations in South Dakota, Arizona, and Wyoming. It was first listed as "endangered" in 1982, then listed as "extinct in the wild" in 1996 before being upgraded back to "endangered" in the IUCN Red List in 2008. In February 2021, the first successful clone of a black-footed ferret, a female named Elizabeth Ann, was introduced to the public.

license
cc-by-sa-3.0
copyright
Wikipedia authors and editors
original
visit source
partner site
wikipedia EN